31.12.2014 Views

Disability rights in the workplace - Canadian Union of Public ...

Disability rights in the workplace - Canadian Union of Public ...

Disability rights in the workplace - Canadian Union of Public ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Duty to accommodate<br />

In 1999, <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> Canada made a<br />

landmark rul<strong>in</strong>g that obliges an employer to justify<br />

any work requirement that appears discrim<strong>in</strong>atory.<br />

Their rul<strong>in</strong>g - <strong>in</strong> what is called <strong>the</strong> Meior<strong>in</strong> case - also<br />

set out a groundbreak<strong>in</strong>g test that establishes a new<br />

standard for human <strong>rights</strong> and arbitration purposes.<br />

To meet that test, an employer must justify any<br />

practise or work requirement that appears<br />

discrim<strong>in</strong>atory by demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g on balance:<br />

1. That <strong>the</strong> employer adopted <strong>the</strong> standard for<br />

a purpose rationally connected to <strong>the</strong><br />

performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> job;<br />

2. That <strong>the</strong> employer adopted <strong>the</strong> particular<br />

standard <strong>in</strong> an honest and good faith belief<br />

that it was necessary to <strong>the</strong> fulfillment <strong>of</strong><br />

that legitimate work-related purpose; and<br />

3. That <strong>the</strong> standard is reasonably necessary to<br />

<strong>the</strong> accomplishment <strong>of</strong> that legitimate workrelated<br />

purpose. To show that <strong>the</strong> standard<br />

is reasonably necessary, it must be<br />

demonstrated that it is impossible to<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!