02.01.2015 Views

Occupational Regulation - Office of the Legislative Auditor

Occupational Regulation - Office of the Legislative Auditor

Occupational Regulation - Office of the Legislative Auditor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44 OCCUPATIONAL REGULATION<br />

by more than six o<strong>the</strong>r states. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se may be licensed by local government<br />

in o<strong>the</strong>r states. Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> fact that most o<strong>the</strong>r states do not license various<br />

occupations may suggest a need to re-examine <strong>the</strong> utility <strong>of</strong> licensing <strong>the</strong><br />

occupations in Minnesota.<br />

Case Studies<br />

To learn more about how occupational regulation is handled in o<strong>the</strong>r states we<br />

selected a group <strong>of</strong> states that illustrate a variety <strong>of</strong> organizational models for<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r study. These are listed in Figure 2.2. Our research suggests that <strong>the</strong> issues<br />

currently facing Minnesota are very similar to <strong>the</strong> issues facing o<strong>the</strong>r states.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, while occupational regulation is organized and implemented<br />

differently in o<strong>the</strong>r states, <strong>the</strong> states we studied still struggle with <strong>the</strong> same kinds<br />

<strong>of</strong> problems we observe in Minnesota (and discuss in <strong>the</strong> next chapter). We<br />

present a summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> case studies in Appendix A. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ideas for<br />

reform that have been discussed in Minnesota have been tried elsewhere.<br />

Figure 2.2: Case Studies <strong>of</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r States<br />

Organizational feature <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

Arizona<br />

Florida<br />

Maine<br />

Oregon<br />

Texas<br />

Virginia<br />

Washington<br />

Wisconsin<br />

- Comprehensive sunset provision<br />

- Sunrise provision for health-related occupations<br />

- Recent reorganization <strong>of</strong> occupational regulation<br />

- Enactment <strong>of</strong> sunrise legislation<br />

- Privatization <strong>of</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Engineers’ staff<br />

- Regulatory centralization<br />

- Recent revisions to streng<strong>the</strong>n sunrise provision<br />

- Recent history <strong>of</strong> reform and counter-reform<br />

- Health Pr<strong>of</strong>essions Council<br />

- Sunset provision<br />

- Regulatory centralization<br />

- Board <strong>of</strong> Health Pr<strong>of</strong>essions<br />

- Sunrise provision for health pr<strong>of</strong>essions<br />

- Uniform Disciplinary Act for health pr<strong>of</strong>essions<br />

- Centralization <strong>of</strong> health-related boards<br />

- Regulatory centralization under <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Regulation</strong><br />

and Licensing<br />

MINNESOTA’S OCCUPATIONAL<br />

REGULATORY AGENDA<br />

In addition to describing our current system <strong>of</strong> occupational regulation, we sought<br />

to learn what types <strong>of</strong> proposals for occupational regulation have been brought

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!