03.01.2015 Views

EBA Long Report - European Banking Authority - Europa

EBA Long Report - European Banking Authority - Europa

EBA Long Report - European Banking Authority - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

You see threats to your retail<br />

deposit growth due to increased<br />

market competition and changing<br />

customer behaviour.<br />

You see threats to your wholesale<br />

deposit growth due to increased<br />

competition and rate shopping.<br />

You accept increasing your deposit<br />

base through offering better rates<br />

and terms to gain market share.<br />

You are aiming to reduce your loandeposit<br />

ratio.<br />

Figure 12: Deposits (source: RAQ)<br />

Deposits<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

agree/mostly agree<br />

Consequences of Solvency II<br />

The Solvency II regulation that is being introduced affects insurance companies that have been traditional buyers<br />

of securitisation. Some of the effects under Solvency II will include:<br />

Very severe treatment of securitisation 6 : prime AAAs attract capital charges from a minimum of 7% to a<br />

maximum of 42% for different durations (1-6 years).<br />

Very favourable treatment of covered bonds which attract a comparatively smaller charge than securitisation<br />

(as an example, securitisation has a 7-18 times higher capital charge for AAA/AA depending on duration and<br />

rating) and a smaller capital charge for AAA/AA than similarly dated and ranked corporate bonds (the charge<br />

for CBs is 78%-83% smaller) – though the charge is the same for other ratings.<br />

Very favourable treatments of EEA domestic-currency bonds charged at zero and which therefore attract no<br />

capital charge.<br />

No special treatment of banks’ bonds, which are classed as corporate. Risk weights are based on rating and<br />

duration, with long-dated bank debt more unattractive. This is working against insurance firms helping extend<br />

banks’ debt maturity profile. Insurers need long-dated bonds, but may move to mismatched shorter-dated<br />

debt and us swaps to hedge for duration. Additionally, banks with a low rating will have trouble attracting any<br />

insurers as investors for their bonds – a BBB 5 year bond would attract a 12.5% capital charge.<br />

The net effect on banks may be:<br />

A reduction of exposure of <strong>European</strong> insurers to the <strong>European</strong> ABS market, which is a major risk to the efforts<br />

of the authorities to restart the securitisation market as a funding mechanism for banks, since insurers have<br />

historically been important buyers of securitisation. This has started already. As things stand, there are, by<br />

comparison, direct capital incentives to invest in sovereign or covered bonds instead.<br />

6 The industry comments suggest that the calibration has been fitted to the US subprime at its worst point and<br />

then extended to all securitisations. The 42% referred to above would correspond to an observed global<br />

default rate of 4.6%.<br />

Page 21 of 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!