Non-HDL-C

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Log-linear Relationship Between LDL-C Levels and Relative Risk for CHD 3.7 Relative Risk for Coronary Heart Disease (Log Scale) 2.9 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.0 40 70 100 130 160 190 LDL-Cholesterol, mg/dL • This relationship is consistent with a large body of epidemiological data and with data available from clinical trials of LDL-lowering therapy • These data suggest that for every 30-mg/dL change in LDL-C, the relative risk for CHD is changed in proportion by about 30%. The relative risk is set at 1.0 for LDL-C 40 mg/dL. Grundy S, et al. Circulation. 2004;110:227-239
Fasting and <strong>Non</strong>fasting TG: Equally Predictive of CHD Risk* Fasting <strong>Non</strong>fasting Cumulative Probability of Death 20 15 10 5 0 HR † : 1.41 (1.12-1.79) P = 0.004 TG ≥200 mg/dL TG
Page 1: Current Targets and Treatment Gaps
Page 5 and 6: Role of Low HDL-C in Residual Cardi
Page 7 and 8: Association Between LDL-C, Non-HDL-
Page 9 and 10: CHD risk predicted by HDL and LDL i
Page 11 and 12: New CV events in MI patients with n
Page 13 and 14: Percentage of patients reaching ADA
Page 15 and 16: IS THERE AN ASYMPTOTIC LIMIT FOR LD
Page 17 and 18: CAD risk can be reduced to a maximu
Page 19 and 20: Should both HDL-C and LDL- C be tar
Page 21: Should HDL Raising Be a Target for
Page 28 and 29: Recommendations for management of d
Page 30: NCEP ATPIII, AHA, and ADA: Recommen
Page 33 and 34: NCEP ATP III Guidelines (Cont.) If
Page 35 and 36: American Diabetes Association Stand
Page 37 and 38: Target Levels Risk Level Initiate t
Page 44 and 45: Conclusion Non pharmacological stra

Non-HDL-C

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?