05.01.2015 Views

ontario sugar beet growers - Atrium - University of Guelph

ontario sugar beet growers - Atrium - University of Guelph

ontario sugar beet growers - Atrium - University of Guelph

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CROP: Sugar <strong>beet</strong> (Beta vulgaris L.) cv. E 17<br />

PEST:<br />

Cercospora leafspot, Cercospora beticola, Sacc.<br />

NAME AND AGENCY:<br />

PITBLADO, R E<br />

Ridgetown College, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Guelph</strong>, Ridgetown, Ontario, NOP 2C0<br />

Tel: (5 19) 674-1605 Fax: (5 19) 674-1600 E-mail: rpitblad@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca<br />

TITLE:<br />

CERCOSPORA LEAF SPOT CONTROL IN SUGARBEETS USING HIGH<br />

RATES OF QUADRIS-2005<br />

MATERIALS: QUADRIS 250EC (azoxystrobin), HEADLINE 250EC (pyraclostrobin), PREV AM<br />

(experimental), CUPROFIX 40DF (TD 2389-01 36.9% basic copper sulfate)<br />

METHODS: Sugar <strong>beet</strong>s were planted at the research station in kdgetown on May 9,2005. Three row<br />

plots were established, 7m in length with rows spaced 0.75m apart, replicated four times in a randomized<br />

complete block design. The foliar applications were applied using a specialized small plot research CO,<br />

sprayer with a three nozzled hand-held boom applying 200Lha <strong>of</strong> spray mixture. Two rows per treatment<br />

were sprayed with one unsprayed row between plots. Spray applications were applied on July 12 and<br />

August 10 following the weather timed fungicide spray program Beetcast. Foliar disease assessments<br />

were made on September 1 by counting the number <strong>of</strong> leaf lesion sites and on September 13 by rating the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> disease control between 0-10 with 0 indicating no control and the plants severely spotted while<br />

10 indicated high levels <strong>of</strong> control with no leaf spots being noted. Results were analysed using the<br />

Duncan's multiple range test (Ps 0.05).<br />

RESULTS: Data are presented in Table 1.<br />

CONCLUSIONS: QUADRIS 250EC used at the higher rate equal to HEADLINE 250EC provided<br />

equal Cercospora Leafspot control in <strong>sugar</strong><strong>beet</strong>s. The standard lower rate <strong>of</strong> QUADRIS 250EC<br />

performed equally well however numerically there were more leafspot disease counted and it was not<br />

rated as high as either the high rate <strong>of</strong> QUADRIS 250EC nor the lower commercial rate <strong>of</strong> HEADLINE<br />

250EC. CUPROFIX ULTRA 40DF effectively controlled Cercospora leafspot with similar levels <strong>of</strong><br />

control than both QUADRIS 250EC and HEADLINE 250EC. PRE AM was more effective than the<br />

untreated control however it was considerably less effective in controlling Cercospora Leafspot in<br />

<strong>sugar</strong><strong>beet</strong>s than the other fungicides.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!