ontario sugar beet growers - Atrium - University of Guelph
ontario sugar beet growers - Atrium - University of Guelph
ontario sugar beet growers - Atrium - University of Guelph
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CROP: Sugar <strong>beet</strong> (Beta vulgaris L.) cv. E 17<br />
PEST:<br />
Cercospora leafspot, Cercospora beticola, Sacc.<br />
NAME AND AGENCY:<br />
PITBLADO, R E<br />
Ridgetown College, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Guelph</strong>, Ridgetown, Ontario, NOP 2C0<br />
Tel: (5 19) 674-1605 Fax: (5 19) 674-1600 E-mail: rpitblad@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca<br />
TITLE:<br />
CERCOSPORA LEAF SPOT CONTROL IN SUGARBEETS USING HIGH<br />
RATES OF QUADRIS-2005<br />
MATERIALS: QUADRIS 250EC (azoxystrobin), HEADLINE 250EC (pyraclostrobin), PREV AM<br />
(experimental), CUPROFIX 40DF (TD 2389-01 36.9% basic copper sulfate)<br />
METHODS: Sugar <strong>beet</strong>s were planted at the research station in kdgetown on May 9,2005. Three row<br />
plots were established, 7m in length with rows spaced 0.75m apart, replicated four times in a randomized<br />
complete block design. The foliar applications were applied using a specialized small plot research CO,<br />
sprayer with a three nozzled hand-held boom applying 200Lha <strong>of</strong> spray mixture. Two rows per treatment<br />
were sprayed with one unsprayed row between plots. Spray applications were applied on July 12 and<br />
August 10 following the weather timed fungicide spray program Beetcast. Foliar disease assessments<br />
were made on September 1 by counting the number <strong>of</strong> leaf lesion sites and on September 13 by rating the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> disease control between 0-10 with 0 indicating no control and the plants severely spotted while<br />
10 indicated high levels <strong>of</strong> control with no leaf spots being noted. Results were analysed using the<br />
Duncan's multiple range test (Ps 0.05).<br />
RESULTS: Data are presented in Table 1.<br />
CONCLUSIONS: QUADRIS 250EC used at the higher rate equal to HEADLINE 250EC provided<br />
equal Cercospora Leafspot control in <strong>sugar</strong><strong>beet</strong>s. The standard lower rate <strong>of</strong> QUADRIS 250EC<br />
performed equally well however numerically there were more leafspot disease counted and it was not<br />
rated as high as either the high rate <strong>of</strong> QUADRIS 250EC nor the lower commercial rate <strong>of</strong> HEADLINE<br />
250EC. CUPROFIX ULTRA 40DF effectively controlled Cercospora leafspot with similar levels <strong>of</strong><br />
control than both QUADRIS 250EC and HEADLINE 250EC. PRE AM was more effective than the<br />
untreated control however it was considerably less effective in controlling Cercospora Leafspot in<br />
<strong>sugar</strong><strong>beet</strong>s than the other fungicides.