ontario sugar beet growers - Atrium - University of Guelph
ontario sugar beet growers - Atrium - University of Guelph
ontario sugar beet growers - Atrium - University of Guelph
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CROP: Sugar <strong>beet</strong> (Beta vulgaris L.) cv. El 7<br />
PEST:<br />
Imported cabbageworm, Artogeia rapae (L.)<br />
Tarnished plant bug<br />
NAME AND AGENCY:<br />
PITBLADO, R E<br />
Ridgetown College, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Guelph</strong>, Ridgetown, Ontario, NOP 2C0<br />
Tel: (5 19) 674-1 605 Pax: (5 19) 674- 1600 E-mail: rpitblad@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca<br />
TITLE:<br />
GREEN STREME 930 FOR THE PROMOTING OF VIGOUR AND THE<br />
CONTROL OF INSECTS IN SUGARBEETS-2005<br />
MATERIALS: GREEN STREME (experimental)<br />
METHODS: Sugar<strong>beet</strong>s were planted at the research station in Ridgetown on May 9,2005. Two-row<br />
plots were established, 7m in length with rows spaced 0.75m apart, replicated four times in a randomized<br />
complete block design. The foliar applications were applied using a specialized small plot research CO,<br />
sprayer with a three nozzled hand-held boom applying 200Lha <strong>of</strong> spray mixture. Spray applications were<br />
applied on May 26 at the two leaf stage and on July 22 at fill leaf cover. Plant vigour ratings were taken<br />
on June 14 while the foliar insect feeding damage assessments were made on August 3 by counting the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> leaves with leaf feeding holes caused by insect feeding. Yields were taken at harvest on<br />
October 4. Representative <strong>beet</strong> root samples were sent away to have laboratory <strong>sugar</strong> analysis conducted<br />
by the Michigan Sugar Company. Results were analysed using the Duncan's multiple range test (Ps<br />
0.05).<br />
RESULTS: Data are presented in Table 1.<br />
CONCLUSIONS: GREEN STREME 930 had no influence in plant vigour throughout the season nor<br />
did it have any effect in reducing the number <strong>of</strong> foliar feeding insects in <strong>sugar</strong><strong>beet</strong>s. Yields and the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> <strong>beet</strong>s harvested were not affected. The results <strong>of</strong> the <strong>sugar</strong> testing has not yet been completed.<br />
Table 1. Plant foliar vigour ratings, insect leaf feeding damage and yields in <strong>sugar</strong><strong>beet</strong>s.<br />
Treatments<br />
# leaves with<br />
Plant Vigour Yield # <strong>beet</strong>s<br />
insect feeding<br />
Rate Ratings (0-10) "<br />
kglplot harvested<br />
Product1<br />
holes<br />
ha<br />
June 14 August 3 October 4 October 4<br />
GREEN STREME 930 7.5 1 8.3 a* 19.5 a 21.85 a 39.0 a<br />
CONTROL 8.3 a 23.0 a 27.30 a 48.0 a<br />
--<br />
ANOVA P50.05<br />
Coefficient <strong>of</strong> Variation (%)<br />
*These values are the means <strong>of</strong> four replications. Numbers within a column followed by the same small<br />
letter are not significantly different according to a Duncan's Multiple Range Test (Ps0.05).<br />
11 Plant Vigour Ratings (0-10) - 0 plants in poor health, 10- plants in excellent health.