06.01.2015 Views

Managing the Miombo Woodlands of Southern Africa - PROFOR

Managing the Miombo Woodlands of Southern Africa - PROFOR

Managing the Miombo Woodlands of Southern Africa - PROFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for developing <strong>the</strong>se markets, miombo products <strong>of</strong>fer few easy paths out <strong>of</strong> poverty. Even when<br />

<strong>the</strong>re appear to be good markets for tree products, <strong>the</strong>y may be easily available, and oversupply can<br />

depress producer prices, limiting <strong>the</strong> incentive for management.<br />

One outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> markets for miombo tree products is domestication. While this<br />

trend may be appropriate and desirable from a market and livelihood perspective, it has <strong>the</strong> effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> reducing interest in <strong>the</strong> natural miombo woodland. When forest products are commercialized,<br />

many end up being domesticated, cultivated, and subject to more intensifi ed production (Arnold<br />

et al. 2006; Arnold and Dewees 1997; Ruiz-Perez et al. 2004). Taking woodfuel as <strong>the</strong> example,<br />

Arnold et al. (2006) noted that <strong>the</strong> potential for increasing supplies from farmer-grown trees is<br />

likely to continue to grow, and that changes in land tenure and labor availability, and increased<br />

scarcity <strong>of</strong> wild resources will favor <strong>the</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> low-input tree crops. This is very much what<br />

has happened in higher rainfall areas, but whe<strong>the</strong>r it is as likely in <strong>the</strong> drier miombo woodland<br />

areas is open to question.<br />

An enormous amount <strong>of</strong> attention has focused on <strong>the</strong> potential for <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> markets<br />

for environmental services (Chomitz 2007). The fact is, in <strong>the</strong> miombo region, <strong>the</strong>se markets are<br />

nearly nonexistent and are largely aspirational, except for tourism-related payment schemes. Limited<br />

experience with <strong>the</strong>se markets has shown <strong>the</strong> importance and potential for integrating <strong>the</strong>se types<br />

<strong>of</strong> schemes with more comprehensive rural development initiatives. This tends to increase <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

complexity, and <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir development and implementation. To some extent, <strong>the</strong> priority<br />

on catalyzing markets for environmental services becomes subordinated to <strong>the</strong> challenging <strong>the</strong>mes<br />

<strong>of</strong> local participation, benefi t sharing, and community-based management. These <strong>the</strong>mes are not<br />

incompatible, but <strong>the</strong>y do represent a very specifi c market niche for highly specialized delivery<br />

mechanisms for payments for environmental services. Carbon markets are especially problematic<br />

because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> focus on <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> a single service. The challenge for <strong>the</strong> forestry sector more<br />

generally (and not just in <strong>the</strong> miombo region) is to fi gure out how <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> important objectives<br />

for putting in place sustainable forest management systems can be reconciled with priorities for<br />

establishing and operating carbon markets.<br />

3.4 ORGANIZATIONAL BARRIERS TO SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF<br />

MIOMBO<br />

In this section we examine organizational weakness at <strong>the</strong> local and national levels.<br />

Weak local organizations<br />

Section 2 outlined some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> policy issues surrounding devolution. Independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> policy<br />

framework, at <strong>the</strong> local level, devolution requires <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> competent and capable local<br />

organizations. There is great diversity across <strong>the</strong> region in terms <strong>of</strong> local organizational capacity,<br />

even within countries. So, for example, traditional authorities are strong and have legitimacy in<br />

some parts <strong>of</strong> Zimbabwe whereas in o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>the</strong>y are all but absent. Conversely, modern local<br />

organizations have no legitimacy in some parts and are functioning and well respected in o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

But, to generalize across <strong>the</strong> region, local organizations are <strong>of</strong>ten weak, be <strong>the</strong>y local community<br />

organizations, traditional authorities, or local government. The fact that local organizations are weak<br />

44 MANAGING THE MIOMBO WOODLANDS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!