08.01.2015 Views

Resonant nonlinear magneto-optical effects in atoms∗ - The Budker ...

Resonant nonlinear magneto-optical effects in atoms∗ - The Budker ...

Resonant nonlinear magneto-optical effects in atoms∗ - The Budker ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

39<br />

Photodiode signal (V)<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

33.0 33.2 33.4 33.6 33.8 34.0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140<br />

Time (s)<br />

FIG. 20 Experimental <strong>optical</strong> rotation signal obta<strong>in</strong>ed by Romalis<br />

et al. (2001b) produced by Hg atomic polarization <strong>in</strong> a<br />

magnetic field of 17 mG. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>set shows a one-second segment<br />

of the data.<br />

from resonance by 20 GHz, is detected (Fig. XII.B). 35<br />

<strong>The</strong> sp<strong>in</strong>-precession frequency is measured <strong>in</strong> two identical<br />

cells with opposite directions of the electric field<br />

with respect to the magnetic field. This device has a<br />

sensitivity to energy level shifts of ∼0.3 µHz/Hz 1/2 over<br />

a measurement time of a hundred seconds, better than<br />

any other exist<strong>in</strong>g device (see Sec. XII.A). With several<br />

months of data tak<strong>in</strong>g, it has set a limit on the atomic<br />

EDM of ∣ ∣d ( 199 Hg )∣ ∣ < 2.1×10 −28 e cm (95% confidence).<br />

C. <strong>The</strong> Aharonov-Casher phase shift<br />

<strong>The</strong> Aharonov-Casher effect was studied <strong>in</strong>terferometrically<br />

with neutrons (Cimm<strong>in</strong>o et al., 1989) and<br />

with the fluor<strong>in</strong>e nucleus <strong>in</strong> the TlF molecule (Sangster<br />

et al., 1993, 1995) us<strong>in</strong>g conventional Ramsey molecular<br />

beam spectroscopy. Faraday-Ramsey spectroscopy<br />

(Sec. VIII.C) is a convenient method for measur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

Aharonov-Casher effect with atoms. Gorlitz et al. (1995)<br />

performed such an experiment with Rb atoms and found<br />

agreement with the theoretical prediction at the level<br />

of 1.4%. <strong>The</strong>y verified the l<strong>in</strong>ear dependence of the<br />

phase shift on the strength of the electric field as well<br />

as its nondispersive nature (<strong>in</strong>dependence of velocity).<br />

An atomic Aharonov-Casher effect was also measured by<br />

Zeiske et al. (1995) us<strong>in</strong>g an atomic <strong>in</strong>terferometer.<br />

In Faraday-Ramsey geometry, the phase shift accumulated<br />

<strong>in</strong> a homogeneous static electric field between<br />

∆M = 2 sublevels of an aligned atom is given by<br />

φ AC = 2gµ<br />

¯hc<br />

∫<br />

EdL, (37)<br />

where the field <strong>in</strong>tegral extends over the flight region between<br />

the two <strong>optical</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction regions. This phase<br />

shift enters directly <strong>in</strong> the Faraday-Ramsey l<strong>in</strong>e-shape<br />

function given by Eq. (26). When us<strong>in</strong>g atoms with a<br />

well known g-factor, the measurement of φ AC can thus<br />

be used to experimentally determ<strong>in</strong>e the electric field <strong>in</strong>tegral<br />

(Rasbach et al., 2001).<br />

D. Measurement of tensor electric polarizabilities<br />

<strong>The</strong> quadratic Stark effect <strong>in</strong> a Zeeman manifold<br />

|F, M〉 <strong>in</strong> a homogeneous static electric field E can be<br />

parameterized by<br />

An atom mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an electric field E with velocity v<br />

experiences a magnetic field B = E × v/c. This “motional”<br />

magnetic field <strong>in</strong>duces phase shifts of the atomic<br />

magnetic sublevels and thus affects <strong>nonl<strong>in</strong>ear</strong> <strong>magneto</strong><strong>optical</strong><br />

signals. <strong>The</strong> E × v effect is a l<strong>in</strong>ear Stark effect<br />

that represents a severe systematic problem <strong>in</strong> many<br />

EDM experiments. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>duced phase shift is given by<br />

the Aharonov-Casher (1984) phase<br />

φ AC = 1<br />

¯hc<br />

∫<br />

(c)<br />

µ × E(s) · ds (35)<br />

acquired by a magnetic moment µ carried on a path (c). 36<br />

<strong>The</strong> phase (35) is <strong>in</strong>dependent of the shape of the trajectory<br />

(c) and is thus referred to as a “topological phase”.<br />

∆ s (F, M) = − 1 2 αE2 , (38)<br />

where the static electric polarizability α can be decomposed<br />

<strong>in</strong>to scalar (α 0 ) and tensor (α 2 ) parts accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

(Angel and Sandars, 1968):<br />

α = α 0 + 3M 2 − F (F + 1)<br />

F (2F − 1)<br />

α 2 . (39)<br />

States with J = 1/2, such as the alkali ground states,<br />

can only have tensor properties due to nonzero nuclear<br />

sp<strong>in</strong>. Tensor polarizabilities of such states are suppressed<br />

compared to the scalar polarizabilities by the ratio of the<br />

hyperf<strong>in</strong>e splitt<strong>in</strong>g to the energy separation between the<br />

35 A previous (several times less sensitive) version of this experiment<br />

(Jacobs et al., 1995) used the same light beam for both<br />

pump<strong>in</strong>g and prob<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

36 Equation (35) can be easily derived by consider<strong>in</strong>g a particle with<br />

magnetic moment mov<strong>in</strong>g along a trajectory whose element is<br />

given by ds = vdt. <strong>The</strong> particle acquires a differential phase shift<br />

dφ = · B<br />

¯h<br />

dt = · E × v<br />

¯hc<br />

which gives (35) upon <strong>in</strong>tegration.<br />

dt = · E × ds , (36)<br />

¯hc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!