Emmett/Gem County Community Review Report Summary
Emmett/Gem County Community Review Report Summary
Emmett/Gem County Community Review Report Summary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Community</strong> Survey Results<br />
A 66-item survey gauging <strong>Emmett</strong> residents’ perceptions about the quality of various aspects<br />
of their community was distributed prior to, during, and after the on-site evaluations by<br />
members of the home and visiting teams. The surveys were distributed to a diverse sample<br />
of <strong>Emmett</strong> residents by community members, Americorps volunteers, and members of a<br />
research team from the Psychology Department at Boise State University. To ensure a<br />
diverse sample, surveys were distributed to students at the local high school, to business<br />
owners, to shoppers at major grocery and retail outlets, and via a systematic random<br />
sampling procedure (i.e., distributing a survey at every fifth house) in <strong>Emmett</strong><br />
neighborhoods. A total of 286 surveys were completed and returned.<br />
The survey instrument was modeled on that used during Idaho <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Review</strong>s in other<br />
communities, including Hayden, Heyburn, Jerome, Kooskia, Priest River, Weiser, and Buhl.<br />
Questions on the survey addressed a wide variety of community features, including<br />
infrastructure, education, housing, neighborhood appearance, availability and quality of local<br />
services, and employment. The survey items were grouped into conceptually distinct<br />
categories (starting with streets and roads and ending with employment opportunities),<br />
allowing for ease in responding and in analyzing the responses.<br />
The respondents were asked to give a quality rating to each of the 66 community features<br />
listed on the survey. A 7-point Likert-type scale response format was used, where<br />
respondents could present their assessments of each community feature as “very poor” (a<br />
rating of 1) to “very good” (a rating of 7), or anywhere in between (numbers between 1 and<br />
7 represented varying degrees of perceived quality).<br />
To better understand the demographics of the respondents, seven introductory questions<br />
preceded the 66 community feature items on the survey. These questions asked respondents<br />
to indicate: 1) their gender; 2) their age; 3) their ethnicity; 4) how many years they had lived<br />
in the community; 5) whether they lived in <strong>Emmett</strong> or another area in <strong>Gem</strong> <strong>County</strong>; 6)<br />
whether they commuted to work in another city or town; and 7) to what city or town they<br />
commute to work in (if applicable). Overall responses to these questions are presented<br />
below.<br />
Gender: Surveys were completed by 157 women and girls (59.7% of the respondents who<br />
indicated their gender) and 106 men and boys (40.3%). Twenty-three respondents (8.0% of<br />
the total sample) did not indicate their gender.<br />
Age: The average (median) age of the respondents was 42 years, with a range of ages from<br />
12-90. Surveys were completed by 62 persons aged 12-18 years (24.7% of the respondents<br />
who indicated their age), 127 adults aged 19-59 (50.6%), and 62 seniors aged 60-90 (24.7%).<br />
Thirty-five respondents (12.2% of the total sample) did not indicate their age.<br />
Race/Ethnicity: When asked to specify their race/ethnicity, 175 respondents (86.6% of the<br />
respondents who indicated their race/ethnicity) reported being White. Sixteen respondents<br />
(7.9%) reported being Hispanic/Latino, three (1.5%) reported being biracial, one (.5%)<br />
74