10.01.2015 Views

Emmett/Gem County Community Review Report Summary

Emmett/Gem County Community Review Report Summary

Emmett/Gem County Community Review Report Summary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

At the conclusion of the survey, the respondents were asked to express, in their own<br />

words, their perceptions about the strengths and weaknesses of <strong>Emmett</strong>. Specifically, the<br />

respondents were asked to list: 1) what they considered to be strengths and assets of<br />

<strong>Emmett</strong>; 2) what they felt the short-term challenges of <strong>Emmett</strong> were; 3) what they felt the<br />

long-term challenges of <strong>Emmett</strong> were; 4) what they hoped to see accomplished in<br />

<strong>Emmett</strong>; and 5) any additional comments or suggestions. The written answers were<br />

analyzed for common themes through a content analysis procedure.<br />

The respondents listed a large number of features that they considered to be strengths and<br />

assets of the <strong>Emmett</strong> area. A number of common themes emerged. As seen in Table 6,<br />

the most commonly reported strength/asset was the rural, small town nature of the<br />

community (reported by over one-third of the respondents who completed this item),<br />

followed closely by the friendly, caring people of the community. Other fairly common<br />

response themes focused on <strong>Emmett</strong>’s proximity to other Idaho cities and recreation<br />

areas, and its quiet, sparsely populated, and family-oriented nature.<br />

Table 6: Strengths and Assets of <strong>Emmett</strong><br />

Percent of<br />

Respondents Number<br />

Rural/Small town setting 33.7 55<br />

Friendly and caring residents 30.7 50<br />

Proximity to other communities and cities (e.g., Boise) 14.1 23<br />

Access to outdoor recreation opportunities (e.g., hunting,<br />

13.5 22<br />

fishing, horseback riding)<br />

Quiet area 12.3 20<br />

Not a crowded area 9.2 15<br />

Family-oriented community 8.6 14<br />

Note. The percentages listed are “valid percentages”, meaning that they are calculated<br />

out of the total number of respondents who completed the item (123 respondents, or<br />

43.0% of the sample, did not complete this item). Because the respondents could make<br />

more than one response to this item, the cumulative percentage may exceed 100.<br />

A number of short-term challenges were also identified. As seen in Table 7, the most<br />

commonly cited short-term challenge regarded bringing in businesses and industry<br />

offering well-paying local jobs (reported by over 40% of the respondents who completed<br />

this item). Other perceived short-term challenges included needing effective leadership<br />

in local government, slowing growth and development, providing more activities for<br />

youth and families, and generating greater community involvement (see Table 7).<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!