Emmett/Gem County Community Review Report Summary
Emmett/Gem County Community Review Report Summary
Emmett/Gem County Community Review Report Summary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
At the conclusion of the survey, the respondents were asked to express, in their own<br />
words, their perceptions about the strengths and weaknesses of <strong>Emmett</strong>. Specifically, the<br />
respondents were asked to list: 1) what they considered to be strengths and assets of<br />
<strong>Emmett</strong>; 2) what they felt the short-term challenges of <strong>Emmett</strong> were; 3) what they felt the<br />
long-term challenges of <strong>Emmett</strong> were; 4) what they hoped to see accomplished in<br />
<strong>Emmett</strong>; and 5) any additional comments or suggestions. The written answers were<br />
analyzed for common themes through a content analysis procedure.<br />
The respondents listed a large number of features that they considered to be strengths and<br />
assets of the <strong>Emmett</strong> area. A number of common themes emerged. As seen in Table 6,<br />
the most commonly reported strength/asset was the rural, small town nature of the<br />
community (reported by over one-third of the respondents who completed this item),<br />
followed closely by the friendly, caring people of the community. Other fairly common<br />
response themes focused on <strong>Emmett</strong>’s proximity to other Idaho cities and recreation<br />
areas, and its quiet, sparsely populated, and family-oriented nature.<br />
Table 6: Strengths and Assets of <strong>Emmett</strong><br />
Percent of<br />
Respondents Number<br />
Rural/Small town setting 33.7 55<br />
Friendly and caring residents 30.7 50<br />
Proximity to other communities and cities (e.g., Boise) 14.1 23<br />
Access to outdoor recreation opportunities (e.g., hunting,<br />
13.5 22<br />
fishing, horseback riding)<br />
Quiet area 12.3 20<br />
Not a crowded area 9.2 15<br />
Family-oriented community 8.6 14<br />
Note. The percentages listed are “valid percentages”, meaning that they are calculated<br />
out of the total number of respondents who completed the item (123 respondents, or<br />
43.0% of the sample, did not complete this item). Because the respondents could make<br />
more than one response to this item, the cumulative percentage may exceed 100.<br />
A number of short-term challenges were also identified. As seen in Table 7, the most<br />
commonly cited short-term challenge regarded bringing in businesses and industry<br />
offering well-paying local jobs (reported by over 40% of the respondents who completed<br />
this item). Other perceived short-term challenges included needing effective leadership<br />
in local government, slowing growth and development, providing more activities for<br />
youth and families, and generating greater community involvement (see Table 7).<br />
90