Performance of Flagship Programmes in Tamil Nadu

More documents

Recommendations

Info

provided employment (Table 2.8). It is noted that in 2010-11 the average person days generated per household declined to 43.8 from 54.7 in 2009-10 (Table 2.8). Year No. of HH demanded Job Table 2.8: Employment Generated under NREG Scheme in Tamil Nadu and India: 2008-09 to 2010-11 No. of HH provided work Person Days Generated (Lakh) % SC participation % ST participation % women participation Avg. Person days per HH HHs availed 100 days generation Tamil Nadu 2008-09 3345648 3345648 1203.59 60.27 1.74 79.67 35.97 508122 15.19 2009-10 4373257 4373257 2390.75 59.07 2.5 82.91 54.67 760689 17.39 2010-11 5983759 5955792 2623.28 29.15 1.25 76.90 43.84 437396 7.34 All India 2008-09 45518907 45115358 21632.86 29.29 25.43 47.88 47.95 6521268 14.45 2009-10 52920154 52585999 28359.59 30.48 20.71 48.10 53.93 7083663 13.47 2010-11 51595314 51424544 21361.77 22.04 17.40 47.20 41.44 3443922 6.68 Source: http://164.100.12.7/netnrega/writereaddata/State_out/Empstatusall_1011_.html % The top five districts, which provided employment to rural households under NREG Scheme in Tamil Nadu in 2010-11 are: Villupuram (6.1 lakh), Thiruvannamalai (4 lakh), Cuddalore (3.6 lakh), Vellore (2.1 lakh) and Kanchipuram (2.7 lakh). Interestingly Villupuram ranked first in terms of the person days generated (2.44 crore), followed by Thiruvannamalai (1.95 crore) and Vellore (1.69 crore) in 2010-11 (Table 2.9). Coimbatore ranked first in terms of the low cost per person day generated in 2008-09 (with Rs. 75.56), followed by Nagappattinam (Rs. 79.67) and Thiruvannamalai (Rs. 81.72). In 2009-10, Perambalur ranked first in low cost of generating person days (Rs. 58.96), followed by Dharmapuri (Rs. 60.55) and Vellore (Rs. 61.71). However, in 2010-11, Madurai, Thiruvannamalai and Vellore were the top three districts (Table 2.10). In 2008-09, 7,659 works were completed and 12,151 were completed in 2009- 10. But in 2010-11 (up to December 2010), only 714 works were completed (Table 2.11). An inter-state comparison reveals that in terms of fund utilization, Tamil Nadu compares well with all major states (in 2010-11). But in 2009-10, it compared poorly with other major states except Maharastra, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Punjab. It is noticed from Table 2.12 that in 2008-09 and 2009-10, fund utilization ratio in Tamil Nadu was lower than the all India average figure. 14
Table 2.9: District Wise Employment Generated under NREG Scheme in Tamil Nadu: 2008-09 to 2010-11 Districts No. of HH demanded Job 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 No. of HH provided work Person Days Generated (lakh) No. of HH demanded Job No. of HH provided work Person Days Generated (lakh) No. of HH demanded Job No. of HH provided work Person Days Generated (lakh) Cuddalore 204510 204510 112.33 336278 336278 161.32 363103 362162 159.74 Dindigul 126181 126181 53.38 139245 139245 85.17 205825 205071 90.42 Nagapattinam 132442 132442 87.45 88148 88148 78.94 224474 221005 71.46 Sivagangai 59642 59642 51.1 167198 167198 90.44 162200 162171 93.18 Thiruvannamalai 185393 185393 93.54 237348 237348 170.97 399290 397333 195.00 Villupuram 270680 270680 175.51 485118 485118 292.96 611596 609626 244.11 Karur 43110 43110 15.04 70719 70719 28.19 91408 90480 36.15 Thanjavur 68950 68950 26.16 142582 142582 32.49 204090 203366 52.03 Thirunelveli 138504 138504 55.11 154505 154505 83.19 182475 181965 95.75 Tiruvarur 124683 124683 46.53 145945 145945 62.2 162436 161191 57.38 Ariyalur 86154 86154 25.35 128714 128714 43.35 152790 152006 45.71 Coimbatore 80367 80367 13.92 93233 93233 69.35 91319 90213 39.90 Dharmapuri 41732 41732 15.54 55400 55400 45.08 195584 193393 71.74 Erode 178519 178519 12.61 123132 123132 47.82 88932 88612 46.92 Kanchipuram 133353 133353 51.83 188061 188061 119.24 266888 265090 123.50 Kanyakumari 40420 40420 4.67 28016 28016 13.9 35924 35681 20.35 Krishnagiri 62363 62363 15.12 108114 108114 65.39 159215 157943 77.24 Madurai 110767 110767 32.62 201552 201552 84.42 240108 238706 116.32 Namakkal 102400 102400 9.65 88340 88340 43.97 100437 100292 51.41 Perambalur 28305 28305 11.69 70589 70589 22.79 94249 94106 34.70 Pudukkottai 181221 181221 41.15 210128 210128 78.87 226309 225929 106.33 Ramanathapuram 259094 259094 41.65 114455 114455 79.25 169929 169374 77.13 Salem 72620 72620 24.25 151665 151665 117.29 230505 230372 125.49 Nilgiris 9571 9571 1.23 10161 10161 3.71 13548 13343 4.10 Theni 24789 24789 8.42 46060 46060 25.9 85682 85458 24.85 Thoothukudi 153383 153383 40.68 170434 170434 109.41 129919 129373 54.98 Tiruchirappalli 100303 100303 33.35 181907 181907 96.01 199660 199461 94.10 Tirupur 0 0 0 0 0 0 143002 142019 63.85 Thiruvallur 65512 65512 20.34 68688 68688 51.62 246668 244983 108.07 Vellore 199826 199826 50.35 204527 204527 120.01 321218 320238 169.61 Virudhunagar 60854 60854 33.04 162995 162995 67.5 185220 184830 71.79 Tamil Nadu 3345648 3345648 1203.59 4373257 4373257 2390.75 5984003 5955792 2623.27 Source: As in Table 2.8. 15
Page 1: MONOGRAPH 18/2012 Performance of Fl
Page 4 and 5: MONOGRAPH 18/2012 January 2012 Rs.2
Page 6 and 7: Executive Summary This study provid
Page 8 and 9: (3) In Vellore, Coimbatore, Thiruva
Page 10 and 11: (vii) Accelerated Rural Water Suppl
Page 12 and 13: Performance of Urban Development Sc
Page 14 and 15: (3) Towards T& D loss reduction mea
Page 16 and 17: Chapter 10 Mid Day Meal Programme 8
Page 18 and 19: Table 6.2 Funds Allotted, Released
Page 20 and 21: Table 14.3 Sources of Water Supply
Page 23 and 24: Chapter 1 PERFORMANCE OF FLAGSHIP P
Page 25: Project (TNHSP), Tamil Nadu Integra
Page 28 and 29: all Panchayats; (vi) increased part
Page 30 and 31: Table 2.3: Composition of Revenue E
Page 32 and 33: provided within 15 days of applicat
Page 34 and 35: Table 2.6: NREGS in Tamil Nadu: Dis
Page 38 and 39: Districts Table 2.10: District wise
Page 40 and 41: Table 2.12: State Wise Outlays and
Page 42 and 43: Year Table 3.1: Financial and Physi
Page 44 and 45: Table 3.3: District Wise Status of
Page 47 and 48: Table 3.5: District Wise Amount Spe
Page 49 and 50: Table 3.7 shows the district wise d
Page 51 and 52: Table 3.9: PMGSY: Phase Wise Per KM
Page 53 and 54: Chapter 4 INDIRA AWAS YOJANA Indira
Page 55 and 56: Table 4.1: Financial and Physical A
Page 57 and 58: Table 4.2: District Wise Financial
Page 59 and 60: Chapter 5 NATIONAL SOCIAL ASSISTANC
Page 61 and 62: Table 5.1: Financial Allocation, Fu
Page 63 and 64: Chapter 6 NATIONAL RURAL HEALTH MIS
Page 65 and 66: Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs)
Page 67 and 68: Table 6.3: Allocation, Release and
Page 69 and 70: Table 6.5: Fund Allocations under N
Page 71 and 72: een selected for up gradation to IP
Page 73 and 74: Furthermore, the number of beds und
Page 75 and 76: However, according to the latest st
Page 77 and 78: Table 6.12: Vector Borne Disease-sp
Page 79 and 80: Chapter 7 INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPM
Page 81 and 82: Table 7.2: Anganwadi Workers in Tam
Page 83 and 84: Table 7.3: Supplementary Nutrition
Page 85 and 86: Table 7.5: Nutritional Status of Ch
Page 87 and 88:
Table 7.6: Nutritional Status of Ch
Page 89 and 90:
Table 7.8 provides the details on p
Page 91 and 92:
The Government of India devised a s
Page 93 and 94:
Table 7.11: Immunisation Performanc
Page 95 and 96:
Chapter 8 ACCELERATED RURAL WATER S
Page 97 and 98:
considerably high, additional funds
Page 99 and 100:
Table 8.4: Water Supply Status in T
Page 101:
Table 8.6: Drinking Water Quality A
Page 104 and 105:
• Develop community managed envir
Page 106 and 107:
The State Government has prepared a
Page 108 and 109:
Table 9.4: TSC Progress for Non-hou
Page 110 and 111:
Table 10.2: Central Assistance Rele
Page 112 and 113:
Considering the massiveness of the
Page 114 and 115:
to those who do not eat egg as per
Page 116 and 117:
Table 10.10: Allocation and Utiliza
Page 118 and 119:
The State Planning team has prepare
Page 120 and 121:
Table 11.3: Financial Achievements
Page 122 and 123:
een significant and conspicuous and
Page 124 and 125:
Table 11.8: District Wise Net Enrol
Page 126 and 127:
(v) Appointment of Teachers Top pri
Page 128 and 129:
106
Page 130 and 131:
the delivery of civic services by u
Page 132 and 133:
crore for the grant assistance unde
Page 134 and 135:
taken up at the end of 10 th Plan.
Page 136 and 137:
Project Name Improvement of water s
Page 138 and 139:
een completed and Rs.148 crore has
Page 140 and 141:
• Subscription to National Public
Page 142 and 143:
Appendix 12.1 APPROVED URBAN INFRAS
Page 144 and 145:
Improvement to Water Supply Scheme
Page 146 and 147:
Currently, the Directorate of Horti
Page 148 and 149:
ack ended subsidy and offered throu
Page 150 and 151:
Table 13.3: Physical Targets and Ac
Page 152 and 153:
Table 13.5: Area under Crops in Tam
Page 154 and 155:
Table 13.9: Seeds Distribution Prog
Page 156 and 157:
(iii) Integrated Scheme for Oilseed
Page 158 and 159:
Table 14.1: Central Assistance Rele
Page 160 and 161:
Table 14.3: Sources of Water Supply
Page 162 and 163:
. Other Irrigation Schemes in Tamil
Page 164 and 165:
142
Page 166 and 167:
generating stations of Government o
Page 168 and 169:
15.2 Eleventh Five Year Plan: Objec
Page 170 and 171:
• Based on the consumer mix and t
Page 172 and 173:
Table 15.4: Status of Approval of R
Page 174 and 175:
• In order to avail the assistanc
Page 176 and 177:
Table 16.2: Summary of State-wise S
Page 178 and 179:
Year Installed Capacity (MW) Table
Page 180 and 181:
(ii) Consumers and Pattern of Power
Page 182 and 183:
Table 16.9: Number of Pump Sets Ene
Page 184 and 185:
Table 16.11: Proposed New Generatio
Page 186 and 187:
2,768 circuit kilometers of transmi
Page 188 and 189:
166
Page 190 and 191:
was lower than the all India averag
Page 192 and 193:
170
Page 194 and 195:
Government of India (2010), Bulleti
Page 196 and 197:
NCP (2006), “Population Projectio
Page 198:
MSE Monographs * Monograph 5/2008 I
show all

Performance of Flagship Programmes in Tamil Nadu

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?