Complaints and enquiries - Air Transport Users Council
Complaints and enquiries - Air Transport Users Council
Complaints and enquiries - Air Transport Users Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
16<br />
Financial protection<br />
Last year the failures of Oasis Hong Kong <strong>Air</strong>lines, Zoom <strong>and</strong> XL, amongst<br />
other airlines, left thous<strong>and</strong>s of British passengers str<strong>and</strong>ed abroad or, for<br />
those who were yet to travel, out of pocket. This is because there is no<br />
financial protection against the failure of schedule airlines in the UK as there<br />
is for tour operators (under the ATOL scheme).<br />
When an airline fails, passengers can get their airfare refunded from their<br />
credit card company under the Consumer Credit Act if they made their<br />
booking by credit card. But purchases made on credit cards must be above<br />
£100 <strong>and</strong> be made directly with the supplier. And many passengers do not<br />
pay for flight tickets with a credit card; they may not own one or they may wish<br />
to avoid credit card charges. Alternatively passengers can get their money<br />
back through their travel insurance. But few travel insurance policies offer<br />
cover against the failure of scheduled airlines <strong>and</strong>, of those that do, some<br />
have exclusions that appear to potentially dilute the cover.<br />
For a number of years, we have called for government to introduce a financial<br />
protection scheme for the failure of scheduled airlines similar to the ATOL<br />
scheme for tour operators. In 2005, we supported the CAA’s detailed proposal<br />
for a financial protection scheme for scheduled airlines. But the Government<br />
declined to take forward the CAA’s proposals.<br />
In October, our chairman wrote to Geoff Hoon, the then Secretary of State for<br />
<strong>Transport</strong>, about this issue. In her letter she suggested that the current<br />
economic climate <strong>and</strong> the increasingly competitive nature of the industry<br />
raised the spectre of a greater likelihood of airline failure. This, together with a<br />
background of consumers’ general lack of underst<strong>and</strong>ing of financial<br />
protection, had made air passengers increasingly vulnerable to the impact of<br />
an airline’s failure. Further, we suggested that this was clearly demonstrated<br />
by the numbers of passengers seemingly left out of pocket or str<strong>and</strong>ed abroad<br />
following recent failures.<br />
The AUC’s previous position in respect of scheduled airline failure has been<br />
that protection should be via a flat fee levy on all passengers to be paid into a<br />
common fund. This levy should cover passengers for reimbursement of<br />
monies <strong>and</strong> for those already abroad, completion of holiday <strong>and</strong> return home.<br />
We continue to hold this view <strong>and</strong> urge that detailed consideration be given to<br />
extending financial protection for air passengers, to include the failure of<br />
scheduled airlines.<br />
Despite the current economic climate <strong>and</strong> pressure from us <strong>and</strong> other industry<br />
stakeholders, the Government shows no sign of introducing a scheme.<br />
Perhaps our best hope may be to look to Europe. Last year, the European<br />
Commission commissioned a study to consider the impact on EU consumers<br />
of airline bankruptcies based on an analysis of the causes <strong>and</strong> situations<br />
surrounding aviation bankruptcies in the EU since 2000.