12.01.2015 Views

Complaints and enquiries - Air Transport Users Council

Complaints and enquiries - Air Transport Users Council

Complaints and enquiries - Air Transport Users Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16<br />

Financial protection<br />

Last year the failures of Oasis Hong Kong <strong>Air</strong>lines, Zoom <strong>and</strong> XL, amongst<br />

other airlines, left thous<strong>and</strong>s of British passengers str<strong>and</strong>ed abroad or, for<br />

those who were yet to travel, out of pocket. This is because there is no<br />

financial protection against the failure of schedule airlines in the UK as there<br />

is for tour operators (under the ATOL scheme).<br />

When an airline fails, passengers can get their airfare refunded from their<br />

credit card company under the Consumer Credit Act if they made their<br />

booking by credit card. But purchases made on credit cards must be above<br />

£100 <strong>and</strong> be made directly with the supplier. And many passengers do not<br />

pay for flight tickets with a credit card; they may not own one or they may wish<br />

to avoid credit card charges. Alternatively passengers can get their money<br />

back through their travel insurance. But few travel insurance policies offer<br />

cover against the failure of scheduled airlines <strong>and</strong>, of those that do, some<br />

have exclusions that appear to potentially dilute the cover.<br />

For a number of years, we have called for government to introduce a financial<br />

protection scheme for the failure of scheduled airlines similar to the ATOL<br />

scheme for tour operators. In 2005, we supported the CAA’s detailed proposal<br />

for a financial protection scheme for scheduled airlines. But the Government<br />

declined to take forward the CAA’s proposals.<br />

In October, our chairman wrote to Geoff Hoon, the then Secretary of State for<br />

<strong>Transport</strong>, about this issue. In her letter she suggested that the current<br />

economic climate <strong>and</strong> the increasingly competitive nature of the industry<br />

raised the spectre of a greater likelihood of airline failure. This, together with a<br />

background of consumers’ general lack of underst<strong>and</strong>ing of financial<br />

protection, had made air passengers increasingly vulnerable to the impact of<br />

an airline’s failure. Further, we suggested that this was clearly demonstrated<br />

by the numbers of passengers seemingly left out of pocket or str<strong>and</strong>ed abroad<br />

following recent failures.<br />

The AUC’s previous position in respect of scheduled airline failure has been<br />

that protection should be via a flat fee levy on all passengers to be paid into a<br />

common fund. This levy should cover passengers for reimbursement of<br />

monies <strong>and</strong> for those already abroad, completion of holiday <strong>and</strong> return home.<br />

We continue to hold this view <strong>and</strong> urge that detailed consideration be given to<br />

extending financial protection for air passengers, to include the failure of<br />

scheduled airlines.<br />

Despite the current economic climate <strong>and</strong> pressure from us <strong>and</strong> other industry<br />

stakeholders, the Government shows no sign of introducing a scheme.<br />

Perhaps our best hope may be to look to Europe. Last year, the European<br />

Commission commissioned a study to consider the impact on EU consumers<br />

of airline bankruptcies based on an analysis of the causes <strong>and</strong> situations<br />

surrounding aviation bankruptcies in the EU since 2000.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!