12.01.2015 Views

Complaints and enquiries - Air Transport Users Council

Complaints and enquiries - Air Transport Users Council

Complaints and enquiries - Air Transport Users Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3<br />

baggage. Last year, Regulation EC 1008/2008 (“the third package”) came<br />

into force. This includes provisions that should in effect bring in clarity <strong>and</strong><br />

commonsense to airline pricing. In addition, we can use other generic<br />

consumer protection legislation to address areas of consumer detriment in air<br />

transport. For example, we frequently challenge airlines’ conditions of carriage<br />

by reference to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations.<br />

But we continue to receive large numbers of complaints about alleged<br />

infringements of Regulation EC 261/2004. We also believe that the Montreal<br />

Convention has not brought about the benefits, in terms of settlements of<br />

claims for mish<strong>and</strong>led baggage, that we had hoped for. In addition, we note<br />

that many airlines have yet to fully comply with the provisions of the “third<br />

package”. And a number of airlines continue to include what appear unfair to<br />

us to be terms in their conditions of carriage.<br />

We believe that the priority now is for us to do as much as we can to ensure<br />

that the legislation in place is enforced by the relevant bodies to the benefit of<br />

passengers. In general, that means a greater emphasis on our advocacy work<br />

directed at individual carriers <strong>and</strong> at enforcement bodies, rather than at<br />

legislators or industry trade associations. We therefore see much of our role<br />

as increasingly being to identify issues of detriment as they arise <strong>and</strong> to feed<br />

this intelligence to enforcement bodies.<br />

Last year we continued to work with the CAA, the designated National<br />

Enforcement Bodies in EU Member States, <strong>and</strong> the European Commission on<br />

enforcement of Regulation EC261/2004. And we presented them with<br />

evidence of instances from our complaints where we considered that airlines<br />

had not complied with the rules. We also published a report on mish<strong>and</strong>led<br />

baggage settlements under the Montreal Convention. “The luggage lottery –<br />

an AUC report into compensation payments to passengers for mish<strong>and</strong>led<br />

baggage” concluded that the Convention had not brought about the benefits<br />

to passengers in terms of settlements for mish<strong>and</strong>led baggage that we had<br />

hoped for when it came into force in 2005. This report has since prompted the<br />

European Commission to consider an EU wide investigation of airline<br />

mish<strong>and</strong>led baggage settlements.<br />

So it has again been another packed year for the <strong>Council</strong>. I would like to thank<br />

my fellow Members of the <strong>Council</strong>, <strong>and</strong> also the executive team, for their<br />

support they have given me over the year. Their expertise <strong>and</strong> hard work has<br />

been invaluable to me in what has been a challenging, but ultimately<br />

productive, year for the AUC.<br />

Tina Tietjen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!