Complaints and enquiries - Air Transport Users Council
Complaints and enquiries - Air Transport Users Council
Complaints and enquiries - Air Transport Users Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3<br />
baggage. Last year, Regulation EC 1008/2008 (“the third package”) came<br />
into force. This includes provisions that should in effect bring in clarity <strong>and</strong><br />
commonsense to airline pricing. In addition, we can use other generic<br />
consumer protection legislation to address areas of consumer detriment in air<br />
transport. For example, we frequently challenge airlines’ conditions of carriage<br />
by reference to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations.<br />
But we continue to receive large numbers of complaints about alleged<br />
infringements of Regulation EC 261/2004. We also believe that the Montreal<br />
Convention has not brought about the benefits, in terms of settlements of<br />
claims for mish<strong>and</strong>led baggage, that we had hoped for. In addition, we note<br />
that many airlines have yet to fully comply with the provisions of the “third<br />
package”. And a number of airlines continue to include what appear unfair to<br />
us to be terms in their conditions of carriage.<br />
We believe that the priority now is for us to do as much as we can to ensure<br />
that the legislation in place is enforced by the relevant bodies to the benefit of<br />
passengers. In general, that means a greater emphasis on our advocacy work<br />
directed at individual carriers <strong>and</strong> at enforcement bodies, rather than at<br />
legislators or industry trade associations. We therefore see much of our role<br />
as increasingly being to identify issues of detriment as they arise <strong>and</strong> to feed<br />
this intelligence to enforcement bodies.<br />
Last year we continued to work with the CAA, the designated National<br />
Enforcement Bodies in EU Member States, <strong>and</strong> the European Commission on<br />
enforcement of Regulation EC261/2004. And we presented them with<br />
evidence of instances from our complaints where we considered that airlines<br />
had not complied with the rules. We also published a report on mish<strong>and</strong>led<br />
baggage settlements under the Montreal Convention. “The luggage lottery –<br />
an AUC report into compensation payments to passengers for mish<strong>and</strong>led<br />
baggage” concluded that the Convention had not brought about the benefits<br />
to passengers in terms of settlements for mish<strong>and</strong>led baggage that we had<br />
hoped for when it came into force in 2005. This report has since prompted the<br />
European Commission to consider an EU wide investigation of airline<br />
mish<strong>and</strong>led baggage settlements.<br />
So it has again been another packed year for the <strong>Council</strong>. I would like to thank<br />
my fellow Members of the <strong>Council</strong>, <strong>and</strong> also the executive team, for their<br />
support they have given me over the year. Their expertise <strong>and</strong> hard work has<br />
been invaluable to me in what has been a challenging, but ultimately<br />
productive, year for the AUC.<br />
Tina Tietjen