14.01.2015 Views

Managing Intractable Conflicts: Lessons from Moldova and Cyprus

Managing Intractable Conflicts: Lessons from Moldova and Cyprus

Managing Intractable Conflicts: Lessons from Moldova and Cyprus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nested Identities: From History Books to the Emergence of a Post-Conflict Generation in <strong>Cyprus</strong><br />

27<br />

Nowadays nobody, or very few, would opt for enosis 4 or even taksim, but the<br />

perceptions about each other that were created or strengthened during the years<br />

of that struggle, remain. So, when the Megali Idea (see footnote 2) faded away,<br />

what stayed <strong>and</strong> entered the national culture seemingly irreversibly was the Hellenic<br />

– Orthodox synthesis [induced by the concept of Megali Idea]. This shaped the<br />

paradigms <strong>and</strong> the images through the process of Hellenic [Greek] identity building.<br />

As many other national identities, modern Greek identity used negative images of<br />

the other as one of its building stones. Hellenism was to be the model to identify<br />

with, while the ‘other’ was represented by the late Ottoman Empire, the Republic<br />

of Turkey <strong>and</strong> the heirs of the Ottoman Empire, the Turks (Tiryaki, 2013). Turkish<br />

Cypriots are also sometimes subjected to the popular stereotype in which they are<br />

portrayed as the descendants of converted Greeks (Bryant, 2004).<br />

Education has played a substantial role in this identity building <strong>and</strong> consolidating<br />

process. The fact that education has always been a domain of the respective<br />

communities since the time when the isl<strong>and</strong> became a subject to the British<br />

Administration, has led to each side being taught different <strong>and</strong> opposing accounts<br />

of history. As a result, separate school curricula of Greek Cypriots <strong>and</strong> Turkish<br />

Cypriots have only helped to establish the negative reverse images of each other, as<br />

they were focused primarily on the dehumanization <strong>and</strong> devaluation of the other.<br />

Until the violent inter-communal conflict erupted in 1963, the official schoolbooks<br />

of the respective motherl<strong>and</strong>s, guided by stereotypes, were directly used by both<br />

communities. Since that time, they have been using modified versions of a various<br />

degree.<br />

Thus the Greek Cypriot history books treat the history of <strong>Cyprus</strong> as a part of history<br />

of Greece. Such a history is divided into three periods: Ancient Greece, medieval<br />

Greece [Byzantine Empire] <strong>and</strong> modern Greece [characterized by the creation of<br />

the Greek state in the 19 th <strong>and</strong> 20 th centuries]. Some 300 years of Ottoman Empire<br />

period in <strong>Cyprus</strong> is not mentioned as a part of the <strong>Cyprus</strong> history but as a foreign<br />

domination that destroyed the glorious Byzantine Empire. Modern Greece is<br />

identified with modern <strong>Cyprus</strong> history <strong>and</strong> Hellenism is portrayed as a transcendental,<br />

trans-historical category interwoven in all three periods.<br />

4 Although it must be noted that the Resolution on enosis passed by the Republic of <strong>Cyprus</strong><br />

House of Representatives consisted then already only <strong>from</strong> Greek Cypriots on 26 June 1967 is<br />

still valid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!