14.01.2015 Views

Managing Intractable Conflicts: Lessons from Moldova and Cyprus

Managing Intractable Conflicts: Lessons from Moldova and Cyprus

Managing Intractable Conflicts: Lessons from Moldova and Cyprus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nested Identities: From History Books to the Emergence of a Post-Conflict Generation in <strong>Cyprus</strong><br />

29<br />

olum” [Either taksim or death] was the slogan expressing sentiment prevailing among<br />

Turkish Cypriots.<br />

The independence of the Republic of <strong>Cyprus</strong> has been also perceived differently.<br />

Although, when it became independent on 16 August 1960, Greek Cypriots <strong>and</strong><br />

Turkish Cypriots celebrated the event separately, within their communities (Holl<strong>and</strong><br />

& Faustman, 2010, p. 57), Turkish Cypriots were the ones who demonstrated more<br />

enthusiasm. Greek Cypriots started commemorating the independence only in 1979,<br />

as a reaction to the 1974 events. They also started using the Cypriot national flag <strong>and</strong><br />

created their own Olympic team, while before they were using the Greek national<br />

flag <strong>and</strong> were part of the Greek Olympic team (Papadakis, 2010, p. 65).<br />

Turkish Cypriots, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, currently completely ignore the Independence<br />

Day. Since the collapse of the 1960 Republic in 1963, but mainly after the<br />

establishment of the Turkish Republic of Northern <strong>Cyprus</strong>, Turkish national<br />

symbolism was introduced <strong>and</strong> Turkish national holidays, including its military<br />

parades, started being celebrated together with the Turkish Cypriot ones. Instead<br />

of the Republic of <strong>Cyprus</strong>’ Independence Day, the TRNC Independence Day is<br />

celebrated (Tiryaki, 2013).<br />

The beginning of the conflict is also viewed <strong>and</strong> perceived differently. What Greek<br />

Cypriots view as ‘invasion’ by Turkey in 1974, Turkish Cypriots call ‘baris harekati’,<br />

the peace operation. While for Greek Cypriots the conflict started in 1974, for<br />

Turkish Cypriots it started in 1963 when they were ousted by Greek Cypriots <strong>from</strong><br />

the bi-communal government <strong>and</strong> comprised 3 per cent of the isl<strong>and</strong>’s territory<br />

(Brus et al., 2008, pp. 24-26).<br />

It is only logical that with such a big difference between the views of Greek Cypriots<br />

<strong>and</strong> Turkish Cypriots over the reasons <strong>and</strong> date of the conflict’s outburst, the visions<br />

for the solution also differ. According to the polls, the majority of Greek Cypriots<br />

favor a unitary state over other alternatives. Federation is a distant solution. 77 per<br />

cent of Greek Cypriots favor a unitary state with a ‘one person one vote’ principle,<br />

agreement agreed upon behind the scenes at the Congress of Berlin in summer 1878, <strong>Cyprus</strong><br />

was transferred to Britain. Although the Convention contained a provision that “if Russia<br />

returns Kars <strong>and</strong> other territories in Armenia, which were taken in the last war [Russo-Turkish<br />

War 1877-78 that ended up with defeat of Turkey <strong>and</strong> Peace Treaty of San Stefano], to Turkey,<br />

<strong>Cyprus</strong> will be evacuated by Britain <strong>and</strong> the Convention will be annulled”, additional agreement<br />

in the Convention deprived the Sultan of every power in <strong>Cyprus</strong> <strong>and</strong> in 1914, when Ottomans<br />

entered the war against the Allies, the British annexed the isl<strong>and</strong> entirely (Hadjidemetriou, 2007,<br />

pp. 302-352).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!