14.01.2015 Views

Managing Intractable Conflicts: Lessons from Moldova and Cyprus

Managing Intractable Conflicts: Lessons from Moldova and Cyprus

Managing Intractable Conflicts: Lessons from Moldova and Cyprus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Civil Society <strong>and</strong> Transnistrian Conflict Settlement<br />

33<br />

CIVIL SOCIETY AND TRANSNISTRIAN CONFLICT<br />

SETTLEMENT<br />

By Denis Cenusa 1<br />

General Aspects<br />

The post-conflict decade drastically influenced people-to-people communication<br />

leading to the separate <strong>and</strong> autonomous development of two different types of<br />

civil societies on each side of the Dniester River. Consequently, as each side of the<br />

river possess two distinguished political systems, the civic sector in the constitutional<br />

territory <strong>and</strong> the one belonging to the Transnistrian region have worked within<br />

different legal, institutional <strong>and</strong> political conditions for years. Actions on the<br />

horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical levels should be considered for bridging the two distinct civil<br />

societies, having the acceptance <strong>and</strong> the involvement of the constitutional authorities<br />

<strong>and</strong> the administration <strong>from</strong> Tiraspol.<br />

Legal <strong>and</strong> Institutional Aspects<br />

Following the ideology of self-determination while creating closer ties with Russia,<br />

the civil entities on the left bank have been discouraged <strong>from</strong> building contacts with<br />

their colleagues <strong>from</strong> the other side. Simultaneously, the officials in Chisinau have<br />

shown strong reservations over encouraging civil society to work across the country,<br />

including in the Transnistrian region.<br />

Even though legislation since 1996 has favored the development of a civil society<br />

(Republic of <strong>Moldova</strong>. Parliament, 2010), the first official framework for developing a<br />

cooperation between state <strong>and</strong> civil society was introduced in 2005 with the Concept<br />

of Cooperation between Parliament <strong>and</strong> the Civil Society (Republic of <strong>Moldova</strong>.<br />

Parliament, 2005). The cooperation establishes the main fields <strong>and</strong> forms in which<br />

the legislative body is able to interact with non-governmental organizations. But the<br />

mechanism encompasses only the non-governmental organizations registered in the<br />

constitutional territory, which de facto means the exclusion of the civic entities set-up<br />

on the left bank <strong>from</strong> the cooperation.<br />

A similar deficiency, although in this case the result of a lack of resources, can<br />

be observed in the “consultative body” created between the Government, civil<br />

1 Denis Cenusa is an independent expert <strong>and</strong> political commentator.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!