14.01.2015 Views

Managing Intractable Conflicts: Lessons from Moldova and Cyprus

Managing Intractable Conflicts: Lessons from Moldova and Cyprus

Managing Intractable Conflicts: Lessons from Moldova and Cyprus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Role of Mass Media in the Settlement of the <strong>Cyprus</strong> Problem<br />

43<br />

message emitted <strong>from</strong> the media has been one supporting a “non-solution” rather<br />

than a solution (Christophorou et al., 2010; INDEX, 2009), a somewhat consistent<br />

picture with how the public opinion reacts on the <strong>Cyprus</strong> problem (Beyatli, Kaymak,<br />

& Papadopoulou, 2011).<br />

Portrayal of Bi-communal, Collaborative <strong>and</strong> Reconciliatory<br />

Civil Society Efforts by the Mass Media<br />

With regards to bi-communal activities, the mainstream media has had a neutral, or a<br />

negative role to play. Overall, the vast majority of the media does not take a supportive<br />

stance <strong>and</strong> does not sufficiently promote bi-communal activities. (Gillespie et al.,<br />

2011). Therefore, the media is not of particular assistance to CSOs that are active in<br />

bi-communal activities attempting to reach a wider audience <strong>and</strong> discussion panels<br />

on political <strong>and</strong> social issues in television programs that, for example, only seldom<br />

include civil society experts.<br />

In the past, especially before the opening of checkpoints in 2003 <strong>and</strong> during the<br />

Annan Plan period (2003-2004), on many instances the media had harshly criticized<br />

participants of bi-communal initiatives <strong>and</strong> organizers alike, on both sides of the<br />

divide. This intense criticism created psychological obstacles for participants, who<br />

became reluctant to participate in events that would “label” them as, in the least,<br />

“unpatriotic” (<strong>Cyprus</strong> Center for European <strong>and</strong> International Affairs, 2011). Such<br />

practices are accentuated whenever there is a “critical l<strong>and</strong>mark decision” coming up<br />

regarding the <strong>Cyprus</strong> problem.<br />

“Us <strong>and</strong> Them”: The Portrayal of the “Other” Community by<br />

the Mass Media<br />

On the media reports on the <strong>Cyprus</strong> Problem, there is little differentiation on either<br />

side when it comes to the portrayal of the “other” side: cultivation of prejudices<br />

(The <strong>Cyprus</strong>, 2011) stereotypical phrases, expressions <strong>and</strong> the position that “our”<br />

side is the righteous one who strives for a solution whereas it’s the “others” who<br />

are negative, characterize the media on both sides, reinforcing a common public<br />

perception that one community does not want a peaceful solution with the other<br />

(Christophorou et al., 2010) by giving disproportional coverage to the few extremist<br />

voices of the other side, rather than of those who wish for a solution.<br />

Expressions such as “our side” <strong>and</strong> the “other side” are often used in everyday<br />

conversations to describe the Greeks/Greek Cypriots <strong>and</strong> the Turkish Cypriots/the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!