Actions speak louder: A second review of healthcare in ... - HMCPSI
Actions speak louder: A second review of healthcare in ... - HMCPSI
Actions speak louder: A second review of healthcare in ... - HMCPSI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINDINGS<br />
ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER<br />
Good practice from <strong>in</strong>spection reports<br />
“To ensure a consistent mental health service, a system <strong>of</strong> supportive<br />
crisis and cont<strong>in</strong>gency plans were <strong>in</strong> place for weekends and staff<br />
holidays.<br />
Health staff <strong>in</strong> the YOT, alongside other specialist mental health<br />
workers from CAMHS, provided YOT staff with a tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme<br />
on mental health issues and how to use the YOT mental health<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g tool. The <strong>second</strong>ed staff were a po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> contact for CAMHS<br />
staff regard<strong>in</strong>g all issues relat<strong>in</strong>g to crim<strong>in</strong>al justice. They also advised<br />
and supported YOT practitioners who had concerns regard<strong>in</strong>g children<br />
and young people’s emotional wellbe<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />
We still found examples <strong>of</strong> thresholds for admission <strong>in</strong>to adult mental health<br />
services be<strong>in</strong>g too high and older children (pr<strong>in</strong>cipally 16 to 18 year olds) hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
problems <strong>in</strong> access<strong>in</strong>g services. One unfortunate example <strong>of</strong> this was a YOT where<br />
emotional and mental health services were not available to young people aged<br />
17 and above, unless they had previously been known to CAMHS.<br />
While l<strong>in</strong>ks with CAMHS generally have improved, the best support was particularly<br />
noticeable where the health worker <strong>in</strong> the YOT was <strong>second</strong>ed from CAMHS and<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ued to have cl<strong>in</strong>ical supervision from that service. Work<strong>in</strong>g protocols between<br />
the YOT and CAMHS, however, could <strong>of</strong>ten be conspicuous by their absence. Notable<br />
<strong>in</strong>stances <strong>in</strong>cluded the lack <strong>of</strong> a confidentiality protocol, which caused particular<br />
difficulties between a YOT and CAMHS <strong>in</strong> exchang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation and <strong>in</strong>putt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
relevant <strong>in</strong>formation onto the YOT IT system. Clear strategies, service level<br />
agreements and protocols do not only reflect a good multi-agency commitment to<br />
vulnerable children and young people but also result <strong>in</strong> improved access and<br />
<strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>in</strong> relation to all levels <strong>of</strong> CAMHS.<br />
Good practice from <strong>in</strong>spection reports<br />
“The employment <strong>of</strong> the psychologist with<strong>in</strong> the YOT meant that it had<br />
excellent l<strong>in</strong>ks with CAMHS. The psychologist and other CAMHS staff<br />
had provided YOT case managers with mental health awareness<br />
tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. The co-location <strong>of</strong> the <strong>second</strong>ed health worker and the<br />
psychologist with<strong>in</strong> the YOT meant that caseworkers had ready, formal<br />
and <strong>in</strong>formal access to advice and support from the two specialist<br />
workers. This also led to a reduced need to refer children and young<br />
people to external specialist services, with much <strong>of</strong> the work be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
undertaken by the <strong>second</strong>ed health worker, or by case workers<br />
supported by the psychologist.”<br />
25