rethinking design - Spatial Design@Massey

More documents

Recommendations

Info

    Sinead Satherley  fig. 23 Pros: I think these designs would be easy to make almost anywhere in the world as most of the world has excess tyre and rubber waste. They would have a low capital investment. They could be implemented in third world or western cultures, either publically or privately. They wonʼt break down over time- at least they will take a very long time to do so, and will need little maintenance. All you will heed to make them is a tool to cut the rubber and a tool to bend the tubing. Cons: I am not sure how safe it is to sit on vulcanised rubber for prolonged amounts of time- it is toxic. For some places tyres or steel tubing may not be accessible. -fig. 24 fig. 25
    Sinead Satherley  Image sources Fig.1 HUwww.wikipedia.orgU Fig.2 Design like you give a damn, Anderson, M. & Anderson, P. (2007). Fig.3 Design like you give a damn, Anderson, M. & Anderson, P. (2007). Fig.4 HUwww.interiordesign.netU Fig,5 HUwww.basicinitiative.orgU Fig,6 HUwww.goselfsufficient.co.ukU Fig,7 HUwww.skatestudyhouse.comU Fig,8 HUwww.skatestudyhouse.comU Fig,9 HUwww.inhabitat.comU Fig,10 HUwww.inhabitat.comU Fig.11 HUwww.stovelldesign.co.ukU Fig.12 HUwww.inhabitat.comU Fig.13 HUwww.inhabitat.comU Fig.14 HUwww.inhabitat.comU Fig.15 HUwww.treehugger.comU Fig.16, 17, 18 & 19 sourced from private collection Fig.20 HUwww.treehugger.comU Fig.21 HUwww.projecthdesign.comU Fig.22, 23, 24 & 25 sourced from private collection BBBibliography Hutching, C. (2006). Statistics N.Z. building, ProDesign Magazine, Feb/March 2006. Anderson, M. & Anderson, P. (2007). Design like you give a damn. New York, U.S.A: Princeton Architectural Press. Smith, C. E. (2007). Design for the other 90%, New York, U.S.A: Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum, Smithsonian Institution. Papanek. V. (1995). The green imperative: ecology and ethics in architecture. London, U.K: Thames and Hudson. HUwww.treehugger.comU HUwww.betterdesign.orgU HUwww.appropriatebuildingdesign.comU HUwww.skatestudyhouse.comU HUwww.architectureforhumanity.orgUH. HUwww.onlineopinion.com.auU HUwww.inhabitat.comU HUwww.basicinitiative.orgU HUwww.stovelldesign.co.ukU HUwww.goselfsufficient.co.ukU HUwww.interiordesign.netU HUwww.projecthdesign.comUH HUwww.tyrerecyclingsuccess.comU HUwww.keetsa.com/blogU HUwww.ted.comU
Page 1 and 2: ethinking design appro-tech and min
Page 3 and 4: ethinking design dARCH Studio is an
Page 5 and 6: ethinking design end of life EcoRoc
Page 7 and 8: ethinking design This is a design f
Page 9 and 10: ethinking design Rethinking design:
Page 11 and 12: ethinking design Paper Samples of p
Page 13 and 14: ethinking design Wool and flax spin
Page 15 and 16: ethinking design Appro-tech: Design
Page 17 and 18: ethinking design Common & Gies Arch
Page 19 and 20: ethinking design Reference list and
Page 21 and 22: ethinking design the material, by c
Page 25 and 26: ethinking design appro-tech: energy
Page 27 and 28: ethinking design How: Biodigesters
Page 29 and 30: ethinking design Windmills and Wind
Page 33 and 34: ethinking design Bibliography - App
Page 35 and 36: ethinking design - Fig. 16. The Ped
Page 37 and 38: ethinking design Websites: Worldcha
Page 39 and 40: ethinking design Low-tech Solar Wat
Page 41 and 42: ethinking design Design Response: M
Page 43 and 44: ethinking design Image List Pic 1:
Page 45 and 46:     Sinead Satherley  fig.
Page 47 and 48:     Sinead Satherley  and a
Page 49 and 50:     Sinead Satherley  fig.
Page 51:     Sinead Satherley  fig.
Page 55 and 56: Who: Sheila Kennedy creates designs
Page 57 and 58: Reference Pavitt, J. (2004) Brillia
Page 59 and 60: ethinking design appro-tech: design
Page 61 and 62: ethinking design Fig 1. Envirofit c
Page 63 and 64: ethinking design (fig 4.) Path to F
Page 65: ethinking design germinating proces

rethinking design - Spatial Design@Massey

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?