Stigma <strong>and</strong> Barriers <strong>to</strong> Care in Terrorism & Public Health Emergencies 49 different than <strong>the</strong> civilian system, <strong>and</strong> both are very complex. The overall assumption that you can equate <strong>the</strong> overall reduction <strong>of</strong> burden <strong>of</strong> disability in a society with a reduction in caseness is based on two ideas being confused. You can prevent caseness <strong>and</strong> not change disability at all. The example was <strong>of</strong>fered earlier about fixing cars. That is a good example <strong>of</strong> a situation where you do not change caseness but you lower disability by making better cars. Ano<strong>the</strong>r classic example would be that you can treat diarrhea, but it would be better <strong>to</strong> fix <strong>the</strong> water by putting chlorine in it. That is <strong>the</strong> way <strong>to</strong> lower disability. We ought <strong>to</strong> distinguish in <strong>the</strong>se response systems between ways <strong>of</strong> lowering <strong>the</strong> prevalence <strong>and</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> disability as opposed <strong>to</strong> lowering <strong>the</strong> incidence <strong>and</strong> prevalence <strong>of</strong> caseness. This is important because <strong>the</strong>y are very different systems <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y require very different kinds <strong>of</strong> interventions, which may or may not be related. DR. BRITT: Something worth highlighting is <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>barriers</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>of</strong> getting treatment following disasters versus military combat duty in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> traumatic exposure. A soldier who is exposed <strong>to</strong> high levels <strong>of</strong> combat is accruing <strong>the</strong>se experiences as part <strong>of</strong> his or her job. In terms <strong>of</strong> encouraging treatment-seeking versus focusing on resiliency <strong>and</strong> not needing treatment, when you have soldiers who are exposed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest levels <strong>of</strong> combat reporting elevated symp<strong>to</strong>ms, <strong>the</strong>re is really a majority who are reporting symp<strong>to</strong>ms. I wonder whe<strong>the</strong>r an emphasis on resiliency might be detrimental <strong>to</strong> that segment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population getting treatment. DR. URSANO: I noticed <strong>the</strong> progression <strong>of</strong> ideas is appropriate <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> collegial sense that we are all in this <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> do some tussling. That is <strong>the</strong> usual progress <strong>of</strong> such a conference that is headed in <strong>the</strong> right trajec<strong>to</strong>ry. It was said somewhere that this is a military meeting. This is not a military meeting. It has <strong>to</strong> be funded by DoD funds, but remember our <strong>to</strong>pic is war, disaster, <strong>and</strong> terrorism. As many o<strong>the</strong>rs have pointed out, we are attending <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> public health model, not just <strong>the</strong> treatment model. Think about <strong>the</strong> different <strong>to</strong>ols <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> different targets that are present in those two models. All <strong>of</strong> that is <strong>to</strong> say <strong>the</strong>re is a reason why this conference is called <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>barriers</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>care</strong>—because we really do think <strong>stigma</strong> is just one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> buckets under <strong>barriers</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>care</strong>. We chose <strong>care</strong> <strong>and</strong> not health <strong>care</strong> because <strong>the</strong> questions <strong>of</strong> dealing with distressed populations involve issues such as increased mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle accidents or people deciding <strong>to</strong> not shop, which can impair <strong>the</strong> economy <strong>and</strong> become a national security issue. That is why this is <strong>the</strong> forum on health <strong>and</strong> national security because it is important <strong>to</strong> address <strong>the</strong> entire range <strong>of</strong> populations from distressed, mild disorder, moderate disorder, <strong>to</strong> severe disorder. There are people with problems caused by <strong>the</strong> trauma itself, along with those who have emergent mental health problems <strong>and</strong> who take <strong>the</strong> opportunity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trauma event <strong>to</strong> come in for <strong>care</strong>. We need a public health model <strong>and</strong> a treatment model <strong>to</strong> address <strong>the</strong> questions <strong>of</strong> <strong>stigma</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>barriers</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>care</strong> across <strong>the</strong> whole population. We have now begun <strong>to</strong> reveal <strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> this problem. We want <strong>to</strong> inform <strong>and</strong> keep track <strong>of</strong> this complexity. If you are still in your bucket <strong>of</strong> being a disaster person or a military person or a terrorism person, it is time <strong>to</strong> jump out. This is where it begins <strong>to</strong> be important <strong>to</strong> think across those frames, because if we do not, <strong>the</strong>re will be national security, continuity <strong>of</strong> operations, <strong>and</strong> continuity <strong>of</strong> government problems for us in <strong>the</strong> future. Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> issue is 9/11, suicides in <strong>the</strong> military, or Katrina, <strong>the</strong>re are substantial issues <strong>of</strong> getting people <strong>to</strong> <strong>care</strong>. Health <strong>care</strong> is one aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>care</strong>, not all aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>care</strong>, or <strong>of</strong> sustained national security. As many o<strong>the</strong>rs have pointed out, we are attending <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> public health model, not just <strong>the</strong> treatment model.
50 Stigma <strong>and</strong> Barriers <strong>to</strong> Care — Caring for Those Exposed <strong>to</strong> War, Disaster <strong>and</strong> Terrorism
- Page 1 and 2:
FORUM ON HEALTH AND NATIONAL SECURI
- Page 3 and 4:
From the Conference Series: FORUM O
- Page 5 and 6:
9 Day 1 Discussion ................
- Page 7 and 8:
ii Bruce G. Link, Ph.D. Professor,
- Page 9 and 10:
iv Alisha H. Creel, Ph.D. Assistant
- Page 11 and 12: vi Kenneth W. Schor, D.O., M.P.H. C
- Page 14 and 15: Executive Summary 1 Executive Summa
- Page 16 and 17: Executive Summary 3 about stigma in
- Page 18 and 19: Executive Summary 5 value, cost-eff
- Page 20 and 21: Executive Summary 7 •• Reinforc
- Page 22 and 23: Introduction 9 1 Introduction Mark
- Page 24 and 25: Mental Health, Stigma and Barriers
- Page 26 and 27: Mental Health, Stigma and Barriers
- Page 28 and 29: Mental Health, Stigma and Barriers
- Page 30 and 31: Mental Health, Stigma and Barriers
- Page 32 and 33: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Mili
- Page 34 and 35: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Mili
- Page 36 and 37: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Mili
- Page 38 and 39: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Mili
- Page 40 and 41: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Mili
- Page 42 and 43: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Disa
- Page 44 and 45: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Disa
- Page 46 and 47: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Disa
- Page 48 and 49: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Disa
- Page 50 and 51: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Disa
- Page 52 and 53: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Disa
- Page 54 and 55: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Terr
- Page 56 and 57: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Terr
- Page 58 and 59: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Terr
- Page 60 and 61: Stigma and Barriers to Care in Terr
- Page 64 and 65: Conceptualizing Stigma and Barriers
- Page 66 and 67: Conceptualizing Stigma and Barriers
- Page 68 and 69: Conceptualizing Stigma and Barriers
- Page 70 and 71: Conceptualizing Stigma and Barriers
- Page 72 and 73: Conceptualizing Stigma and Barriers
- Page 74 and 75: Conceptualizing Stigma and Barriers
- Page 76 and 77: Conceptualizing Stigma and Barriers
- Page 78 and 79: Mitigating Stigma and Barriers to C
- Page 80 and 81: Mitigating Stigma and Barriers to C
- Page 82 and 83: Mitigating Stigma and Barriers to C
- Page 84 and 85: Mitigating Stigma and Barriers to C
- Page 86 and 87: Mitigating Stigma and Barriers to C
- Page 88 and 89: Mitigating Stigma and Barriers to C
- Page 90 and 91: Optimizing Access to Care 77 8 Opti
- Page 92 and 93: Optimizing Access to Care 79 risk f
- Page 94 and 95: Optimizing Access to Care 81 those
- Page 96 and 97: Optimizing Access to Care 83 with i
- Page 98 and 99: Optimizing Access to Care 85 were s
- Page 100 and 101: Optimizing Access to Care 87 develo
- Page 102 and 103: Day 1 Discussion 89 9 Day 1 Discuss
- Page 104 and 105: Day 1 Discussion 91 Directorate at
- Page 106 and 107: Day 1 Discussion 93 tools to addres
- Page 108 and 109: Day 1 Discussion 95 DR. SUTTON: It
- Page 110 and 111: Conference Recommendations 97 10 Co
- Page 112 and 113:
Conference Recommendations 99 Sever
- Page 114 and 115:
Conference Recommendations 101 ence
- Page 116 and 117:
Conference Recommendations 103 ment
- Page 118 and 119:
Conference Recommendations 105 help
- Page 120 and 121:
Conference Recommendations 107 you
- Page 122 and 123:
Conference Recommendations 109 thei
- Page 124 and 125:
Conference Recommendations 111 good
- Page 126 and 127:
Conference Recommendations 113 mode
- Page 128 and 129:
Conference Recommendations 115 fitn
- Page 130 and 131:
Conference Recommendations 117 like
- Page 132:
Center for the Study of Traumatic S