18.01.2015 Views

disciplinary policy & procedure - West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS ...

disciplinary policy & procedure - West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS ...

disciplinary policy & procedure - West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Disciplinary Policy / Version 4<br />

Ratified by ISE<br />

Date of Ratification: March 2011<br />

Date of Review: March 2014<br />

DISCIPLINARY POLICY & PROCEDURE<br />

ID# 2011 045<br />

Author’s Names<br />

Laura Bevan and Caroline Lankshear<br />

Author’s Job Title<br />

Senior HR Manager and HR Manager<br />

Division<br />

Corporate<br />

Department<br />

Human Resources<br />

Version number 4<br />

Ratifying Committee<br />

ISE<br />

Ratified Date March 2011<br />

Review Date March 2014<br />

Manager responsible for review<br />

Laura Bevan<br />

Manager Job Title<br />

Senior HR Manager<br />

E-mail address of Manager<br />

Laura.bevan@whht.nhs.uk<br />

Source of Evidence (If applicable)<br />

N/A<br />

Level of Evidence indicated<br />

N/A<br />

Referenced (Yes/No)<br />

Yes<br />

Key Words (to aid searching) Disciplinary, investigation, warnings,<br />

misconduct<br />

User Group<br />

All staff<br />

The Trust is committed to promoting an environment that values diversity. All staff are responsible for<br />

ensuring that all patients and their carers are treated equally and fairly and not discriminated against on the<br />

grounds of race, sex, disability, religion, age, sexual orientation or any other unjustifiable reason in the<br />

application of this <strong>policy</strong>, and recognising the need to work in partnership with and seek guidance from other<br />

agencies and services to ensure that special needs are met.


Contents Page<br />

1. Change History 3<br />

2. Introduction 3<br />

3. Scope of Policy 3<br />

4. Equality & Diversity Statement 3<br />

5. Manager Responsibilities 4<br />

6. Employee Responsibilities 4<br />

7. Human Resources Responsibilities 4<br />

8. General Principles 5<br />

9. Managing Employee Conduct Day to Day 5<br />

10. Disciplinary Investigation Procedure 6<br />

11. Disciplinary Hearing 10<br />

12. Reasons for Disciplinary Action 11<br />

13. Types of Disciplinary Action 13<br />

14. Requirement for Professional Registration 14<br />

15. Appeals Procedure 14<br />

16. Keeping Records 15<br />

17. Reference Requests for Employees under Investigation 15<br />

18. Process For Monitoring Compliance And Effectiveness 15<br />

19. Review of this Procedure 16<br />

Appendices<br />

Appendix 1 - Terms of Reference Template 17<br />

Appendix 2 – Investigation Report Template 18<br />

Appendix 3 – Disciplinary Hearing Schedule 20<br />

Appendix 4 – Disciplinary Appeal Hearing Schedule 21<br />

Appendix 5 – Guidelines on Writing a Statement 22<br />

Appendix 6 – Disciplinary Process Flow Chart 25<br />

Appendix 7 – Protocol for Dealing with Potential Cases of Fraud 26<br />

Page 2 of 30


DISCIPLINARY POLICY & PROCEDURE<br />

1. CHANGE HISTORY<br />

Version Date Author Reason Ratification Required<br />

Version 3 March 2010 Caroline<br />

Addition of<br />

Yes<br />

Lankshear & Laura<br />

Bevan<br />

information relating<br />

to fraud<br />

Version 2 June 2009 Caroline<br />

Out of date <strong>policy</strong> Yes<br />

Lankshear & Laura<br />

Bevan<br />

Version 3 March 2011 Laura Bevan New legislation Yes<br />

2. INTRODUCTION<br />

The Trust is dedicated to being a fair and reasonable employer and is, therefore, committed to<br />

promoting good and open employee relations. The Trust is concerned that all its employees should<br />

be aware of their obligations with regard to conduct, including acts of neglect or omission and of<br />

the likely consequences of failure to meet these obligations. Where instances of unsatisfactory<br />

conduct arise the Trust after investigation will adopt the formal <strong>disciplinary</strong> <strong>procedure</strong> through<br />

which the issues can be identified without delay and appropriate action taken in a consistent<br />

manner. Where an act of misconduct occurs, <strong>disciplinary</strong> action, which is recognised in law, will<br />

be the Trust’s response.<br />

3. SCOPE OF POLICY<br />

This <strong>policy</strong> and <strong>procedure</strong> applies to all Trust employees.<br />

For Medical and Dental staff, a separate <strong>policy</strong> and <strong>procedure</strong> applies -“Maintaining High<br />

Professional Standards in the <strong>NHS</strong>”, which should be used for cases involving professional<br />

conduct and/or professional capability. This can be found on the intranet via:<br />

http://wghintra01/uploads/out/Medical_Dental_Disciplinary_Procedures_sep09.pdf<br />

Where alleged personal conduct issues arise, the matter will be dealt with in accordance with<br />

“Maintaining High Professional Standards in the <strong>NHS</strong>”, but where the matter proceeds to a<br />

<strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing, this will managed in accordance with the Trusts Disciplinary Policy and<br />

Procedure.<br />

When dealing with a clinical incident or near miss where patient safety is at risk, staff must also<br />

refer to the Trust’s Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy. This can be found on the intranet<br />

via http://wghintra01/uploads/out/Incident_SUI_Policy_V8.5.pdf<br />

4. EQUALITY & DIVERSITY STATEMENT<br />

It is the <strong>policy</strong> of the <strong>West</strong> <strong>Hertfordshire</strong> <strong>Hospitals</strong> <strong>NHS</strong> Trust to provide a Disciplinary Policy and<br />

Procedure that ensures appropriate responses to alleged employee misconduct in an efficient and<br />

fair manner. This document takes into account current employment legislation and must be<br />

implemented in conjunction with the Trust’s Equalities Framework, The Trust’s Equal<br />

Opportunities Policy and Procedure and equality and diversity legislation:<br />

• Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (as amended)<br />

• Race Relations Act 1976 & Amendment 2000<br />

• Disability Discrimination Act 1995<br />

• Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974<br />

• Employment Rights Act 1996<br />

• Equal Pay Act 1970 (as amended)<br />

• Human Rights Act 1998<br />

• EU Directives and Legislation<br />

Page 3 of 30


Managers have a particular responsibility to ensure <strong>disciplinary</strong> processes do not discriminate in<br />

the provision of their service or in the employment of staff. The Trust monitors and publishes<br />

information on the profile of its workforce based on age, disability, ethnicity, gender and marital<br />

status and appropriate actions will be taken by the Equality & Diversity Group to identify and<br />

address any problems.<br />

5. MANAGER RESPONSIBILITIES<br />

• To ensure that employees are aware of the Disciplinary Policy and Procedure and inform<br />

staff of the <strong>disciplinary</strong> rules and issues relating to misconduct and gross misconduct which<br />

will result in <strong>disciplinary</strong> action<br />

• To make clear to staff the rules, regulations and standards of conduct which they are<br />

expected to observe / achieve<br />

• To ensure that the informal stage is used wherever possible prior to any formal action being<br />

taken<br />

• To deal appropriately with employees whose conduct falls short of that required by the<br />

Trust<br />

• To involve the appropriate HR Adviser where potential misconduct has been identified<br />

• To consult with a senior member of the HR department prior to taking a decision to<br />

suspend an employee<br />

• To keep appropriate written documentation relating to incidents of alleged misconduct<br />

• To treat all employees fairly by applying the <strong>policy</strong> consistently and ensuring that any<br />

personal information is kept in complete confidence<br />

• To apply the incident decision tree process as set in the Incident Reporting and<br />

Investigation Policy for any patient safety related incidents to decide on the appropriate<br />

action to be taken<br />

• Request statements in a timely way – see Appendix 5<br />

6. EMPLOYEE RESPONSIBILITIES<br />

• To read, understand and comply with the Disciplinary Policy and Procedure<br />

• To attend investigation meetings as required<br />

• To submit statements when requested in a timely way – see Appendix 5<br />

7. HUMAN RESOURCES RESPONSIBILITIES<br />

• To assist managers in the fair and consistent application of the <strong>policy</strong><br />

• To provide advice to employees and managers concerning individual conduct issues<br />

• To provide training to managers on conducting investigations, to include how to collect<br />

evidence and take witness statements, to ensure compliance with employment law<br />

• To support the Investigating Officer in conducting the investigation and presenting the<br />

management case at a <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing where necessary<br />

• To provide advice and guidance to the panel of a <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing / appeal<br />

• To record and monitor employee conduct cases and report on these with reference to equal<br />

opportunities data<br />

• To liaise with the Local Counter Fraud Service (LCFS) about allegations of potential fraud<br />

as detailed in Appendix 7<br />

Page 4 of 30


8. GENERAL PRINCIPLES<br />

This <strong>policy</strong> and <strong>procedure</strong> is designed to help and encourage all employees to achieve and<br />

maintain standards of conduct within the context of the following general principles:<br />

• To help and encourage employees to improve behaviour rather than just as a way of<br />

imposing a punishment<br />

• To encourage employees to report clinical incidents and near misses that concern patient<br />

safety without fear of <strong>disciplinary</strong> action<br />

• To inform the employee of the allegation against them and to provide the opportunity to<br />

state their case before any decision is made<br />

• No <strong>disciplinary</strong> action will be taken against any employee until the case has been fully<br />

investigated unless the offence is sufficiently serious to warrant immediate suspension,<br />

which will be non-prejudicial<br />

• An employee will not be dismissed for a first <strong>disciplinary</strong> offence, unless it is an act of<br />

gross misconduct<br />

• Employees will have the right to be accompanied by a trade union representative or work<br />

colleague during a <strong>disciplinary</strong> investigation meeting, hearing or appeal<br />

• Employees will have the right to appeal against any formal <strong>disciplinary</strong> action taken<br />

including dismissal<br />

• The <strong>procedure</strong> may be implemented at any stage if the employee’s alleged misconduct<br />

warrants such action<br />

NB: Issues relating to sickness absence will be managed in line with the Managing Sickness<br />

Absence Policy. Concerns relating to employee job performance will be managed in line with the<br />

Performance Management Policy<br />

9. MANAGING EMPLOYEE CONDUCT DAY-TO-DAY<br />

It is the responsibility of managers to set clear standards of expected behaviour and conduct and<br />

to undertake a regular reviews with staff. This forms part of the normal management process and<br />

does not form part of the <strong>disciplinary</strong> <strong>procedure</strong>. This is likely to mean less recourse to the formal<br />

<strong>procedure</strong> if deficiencies in an employee’s conduct are brought to his/her attention at the earliest<br />

possible stage by the line manager in the course of the employee’s normal duties.<br />

Where a manager considers that action should be taken to encourage an employee to improve<br />

their conduct, he or she should meet with the employee, although this may not be necessary for<br />

every offence. This meeting will be used to bring to the employee’s attention the aspects of<br />

conduct that are unsatisfactory, and to ascertain whether the employee recognises there is a<br />

problem.<br />

The manager and employee should agree acceptable standards of behaviour and a plan of action<br />

that must be confirmed in writing. The manager should provide training (if necessary) and close<br />

supervision, set targets and monitor the outcomes. The employee should commit him/herself to<br />

achieving the necessary improvements in their conduct.<br />

Page 5 of 30


10. DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE<br />

10.1 Preliminary Investigations into Clinical Incidents<br />

When a clinical incident occurs, e.g. a drug error, the incident must first be investigated in<br />

accordance with the Trust’s Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy. No <strong>disciplinary</strong> process<br />

will be commenced as a result of a patient safety related incident until at least the initial report of<br />

the investigation has been completed and agreed by the Head of Clinical Governance, Quality &<br />

Risk. To ensure a robust and consistent approach to investigating patient safety related incidents,<br />

the Trust must use the National Patient Safety Agency’s Incident Decision Tree (IDT). This can<br />

be found at:<br />

http://www.msnpsa.nhs.uk/idt2/(d5vvderjryty2f552oxkrr55)/index.aspx<br />

The Incident Decision Tree helps <strong>NHS</strong> managers and senior clinicians decide initial action to take<br />

with staff involved in a patient safety incident. It is intended to promote a consistent and fair<br />

approach, avoiding unnecessary and costly suspensions and exclusions. This process can be<br />

facilitated by the Head of Clinical Governance, Quality and Risk and / or Risk Manager in<br />

conjunction with the Lead Investigation Officer and Head of Nursing / Divisional Director.<br />

The view of the Trust is that <strong>disciplinary</strong> action should not form part of a response to an incident<br />

except in cases where one or more of the following apply:<br />

• Where in the view of the Trust, and / or any professional registration body, the actions<br />

causing the incident / arising from the incident were far removed from acceptable practice<br />

• Where there was intent to harm and / or criminal offence has taken place<br />

• Where there is failure to report an incident in which the member of staff was either<br />

involved or about which they were aware<br />

It is important that managers undertaking a clinical investigation adhere to the timescales for this<br />

process as set out in Appendix 6a on page 47 of the Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy to<br />

avoid any unnecessary delays should a <strong>disciplinary</strong> investigation need to commence.<br />

10.2 Disciplinary Investigations into Employee Misconduct<br />

Where an employee’s conduct is called into question, the Commissioning Manager (usually<br />

grandparent manager of the employee) will appoint a manager to act as Investigating Officer who<br />

is independent to undertake a thorough investigation to establish the facts and to determine<br />

whether or not there is a case to answer.<br />

The Commissioning Manager will draft terms of reference for the investigation - see template in<br />

Appendix 1.<br />

The investigation should commence as soon as possible after the event and where practicable, be<br />

completed within 8 weeks.<br />

The Commissioning Manager will inform the employee in writing of the nature of the allegation and<br />

their right to be represented by a trade union representative or work colleague.<br />

The Investigating Officer will conduct the investigation and will normally interview the employee<br />

and relevant witnesses as part of this process. The employee and witnesses are entitled support /<br />

representation as detailed above.<br />

All relevant facts should be gathered promptly before memories of events fade. Statements<br />

should be taken from the employee and witnesses at the earliest opportunity, using Appendix 5.<br />

All statements should be signed and dated. Where an employee does not provide a statement for<br />

an investigation but is subsequently interviewed, the notes from the meeting will be used instead of<br />

the statement. Any physical evidence should be retained if reasonable to do so. Information<br />

provided by witnesses will be given in confidence and should be in good faith. As a result, the<br />

Page 6 of 30


employee under investigation must not discuss the content of witness statements with the<br />

individuals concerned, to avoid a breach of confidentiality.<br />

At the end of the investigation, the Investigating Officer will produce an investigation report for the<br />

Commissioning Manager, outlining the facts of the case and a chronology of the investigation. For<br />

the report template, see Appendix 2. The investigation report will be factual and will contain<br />

sufficient information for the Commissioning Manager to determine whether:<br />

• There is a case of (gross) misconduct that should be considered at a <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing;<br />

• No further action is required<br />

• There are concerns about the employee’s health that should be referred to Occupational<br />

Health for further advice<br />

• There are serious concerns that should be referred to the appropriate professional<br />

registration body<br />

• There are concerns about capability that should be under the Performance Management<br />

Policy<br />

• There are other recommendations that need to be considered<br />

Based on the information contained in the investigation report, the Commissioning Manager will<br />

decide whether it is appropriate to refer the case to a <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing. If there is no case to<br />

answer, the employee and their representative should be informed of this outcome immediately in<br />

writing.<br />

10.3 Suspension<br />

If whilst the investigation is conducted, it is considered unwise to allow the employee to continue<br />

working, they may be suspended from work for as short a period as possible. Suspension does not<br />

constitute <strong>disciplinary</strong> action and does not imply guilt. The employee will receive full pay and will<br />

lose no rights whilst the investigation proceeds apart from in exceptional circumstances.<br />

Whilst suspending an employee is not <strong>disciplinary</strong> action and is action without prejudice, it may<br />

have a detrimental effect on the employee being suspended. Suspended employees have been<br />

known to experience symptoms of depression and their later rehabilitation to the workplace can be<br />

exceptionally difficult. Suspension should therefore only be used as a last resort and where there<br />

are alternatives to suspension, these should be considered. Alternatives include:<br />

• restricting the employees access to certain areas of work<br />

• temporary redeployment of the employee to a different work area<br />

• changing the work pattern e.g. changing from nights onto days<br />

• supervised practice<br />

Whilst each potential case is different and it is not possible to be prescriptive, suspension will<br />

usually be considered in the following cases:<br />

• violence has occurred or is likely to occur if action is not taken<br />

• extremely volatile situations<br />

• there is believed to be a genuine risk to the safety of staff, patients or visitors<br />

• allegations of assault<br />

• the employee appears to be incapable of carrying out their duties<br />

• other cases of potential gross misconduct<br />

• other circumstances where the employee’s continued presence would seriously impede the<br />

flow of work, or would prejudice an investigation<br />

A decision to suspend an employee will be made by an appropriate senior manager in conjunction<br />

with a senior member of the HR team and will be considered when determining the terms of<br />

reference for the investigation. The decision may also be made during the investigation if<br />

circumstances arise that indicate it is unwise to allow the employee to continue working.<br />

Page 7 of 30


In normal circumstances an employee will only be suspended by a senior manager who has the<br />

authority to suspend although a decision to suspend an employee must be made in consultation<br />

with a senior member of the HR team.<br />

The suspension must be carried out in private with a witness present, stating the content of the<br />

allegation(s). The suspension will be confirmed in writing as soon as is reasonably practicable.<br />

The suspension will be regularly reviewed and every effort will be made to minimise the period of<br />

suspension. The employee should be allocated a designated person whom they can contact for<br />

advice and support for the duration of the suspension.<br />

During the suspension the employee should not undertake any paid work for the Trust or any other<br />

employer. They should not attempt to enter any Trust property or make contact with colleagues<br />

whilst suspended from work, unless for hospital treatment or to attend meetings associated with<br />

the investigation. If the employee or their representative wishes to contact colleagues to request<br />

their attendance at a hearing or to obtain information relevant to the case, prior consent should be<br />

sought from the Commissioning Manager or an HR Manager.<br />

The employee is required to make him / herself available for any meetings they are requested to<br />

attend as part of the investigation.<br />

10.4 Removal of Access to Buildings or Trust Property<br />

There may be cases whereby in conjunction with an investigation it is necessary to remove an<br />

employee’s access to Trust IT accounts / computers / buildings / mobile phones / laptops etc. A<br />

decision about the necessity to undertake such action will be made by a Senior Manager in<br />

conjunction with a senior member of the HR team. If the action to be taken is in respect of the<br />

employee’s access to IT in some capacity, this will be made in conjunction with a senior member<br />

of the Clinical informatics department and the employee will be informed as appropriate. In the<br />

case of retaining 'personal items' a record should be made in case the Trust or the employee can<br />

subsequently claim rightful possession to the item.<br />

10.5 Involvement of Police & Criminal Offences<br />

The Trust’s <strong>disciplinary</strong> <strong>procedure</strong> is separate from any police enquiries, legal proceedings or<br />

convictions regarding a criminal offence relating to employment. Where police have been called to<br />

make investigations and an employee’s action may be regarded as criminal, <strong>disciplinary</strong> action<br />

may proceed on evidence obtained prior to the judgement of the courts. This may not, however,<br />

always be appropriate and in some circumstances, suspension may be considered.<br />

Where alleged misconduct concerns a potential criminal offence, it may be necessary to inform the<br />

Police. In such cases, the line manager should contact the Police to inform them of the alleged<br />

misconduct and notify the employee that the Police have been contacted. The manager should<br />

also notify the appropriate HR Manager.<br />

In most cases an internal Trust <strong>disciplinary</strong> investigation should not be delayed or depend on the<br />

results of a police investigation. In exceptional circumstances it may be necessary to draw a<br />

temporary halt to an internal investigation to ensure that it does not impede the criminal<br />

investigation. The decision to temporarily halt an internal investigation should be made in<br />

consultation with the Police and HR.<br />

Criminal offences outside employment shall not be treated as automatic reasons for dismissal or<br />

action short of dismissal. The main consideration shall be whether the offence has any relevance<br />

to the individual’s duties as an employee is one which makes the individual unsuitable for their<br />

work. Consideration should also be given as to whether other appropriate jobs are available.<br />

Page 8 of 30


10.6 Investigations into Allegations of Fraud<br />

If an allegation is made that has an element of suspected fraud, this should be reported to the<br />

Director of Finance or the LCFS before any internal action is taken including suspension or<br />

commissioning of an investigation.<br />

In cases of fraud, there are a range of sanctions available including criminal, civil and <strong>disciplinary</strong><br />

sanctions. See Appendix 7 for further details of the process to be followed.<br />

10.7 Investigations into Bribery and Acts of Corruption<br />

The Bribery Act 2010, which repeals all existing corruption legislation, has introduced the offences<br />

of offering and or receiving a bribe. It also places specific responsibility on organisations to have in<br />

place sufficient and adequate <strong>procedure</strong>s to prevent bribery and corruption taking place. Under<br />

the Act, Bribery is defined as “Inducement for an action which is illegal, unethical or a breach of<br />

trust. Inducements can take the form of gifts, loans, fees, rewards or other privileges". Corruption<br />

is broadly defined as the offering or the acceptance of inducements, gifts or favours, payments or<br />

benefit in kind which may influence the improper action of any person; corruption does not always<br />

result in a loss. The corrupt person may not benefit directly from their deeds; however, they may<br />

be unreasonably using their position to give an advantage to another. To demonstrate that the<br />

organisation has sufficient and adequate <strong>procedure</strong>s in place and to demonstrate openness and<br />

transparency all staff are required to comply with the requirements of the this Policy. For a more<br />

detailed explanation, please see the Anti-Bribery Policy. Should members of staff wish to report<br />

any concerns or allegations they should contact their Local Counter Fraud Specialist.<br />

Acts of bribery and corruption are potentially criminal offences and may therefore be passed to the<br />

LCFS to investigate.<br />

10.8 Staff Support<br />

External Counselling Services<br />

The Employee Assistance Helpline is a confidential support service, providing practical<br />

information, legal advice, telephone and face-to-face counselling that can help employees cope<br />

with a variety of personal, family or workplace issues. The service is free and available to all<br />

Trust employees by telephoning 0800 328 1437. Further information regarding the counselling<br />

services is available from Occupational Health or the Trust Intranet:<br />

http://wghintra01/human_resources/staffsupport/documents/eah_leaflet.pdf<br />

Trade Union Representatives<br />

If employees are members of a trade union or professional association they may wish to contact<br />

their representative for support.<br />

Support Manager<br />

In cases where an employee is suspended, they should be allocated a designated person whom<br />

they can contact for advice and support for the duration of the suspension. Ideally, this should be<br />

someone whom the employee being suspended feels comfortable with.<br />

10.9 Right to be Accompanied<br />

All employees have the right to be accompanied during investigation meetings, <strong>disciplinary</strong><br />

hearings and appeals by a trade union representative or work colleague. It is the responsibility of<br />

the employee to arrange representation and this request must be ‘reasonable’ in that the<br />

representative should not have a conflict of interest or be likely to disrupt the hearing. Any<br />

representative or companion is entitled to paid time off for the period required.<br />

Witnesses also have the right to be accompanied by a union representative or colleague during<br />

meetings and <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearings, but their representative should not be a colleague who also<br />

has direct involvement in the same investigation in the interest of avoiding bias.<br />

Page 9 of 30


10.10 Accredited Representatives<br />

Where an alleged act of misconduct is believed to have been committed by an employee who is an<br />

accredited representative of a Trade Union or Professional Body, no action under the <strong>procedure</strong>,<br />

other than suspension when serious misconduct is being investigated, will be taken until the case<br />

has been discussed with a full-time official of that Union or Professional Body.<br />

11. DISCIPLINARY HEARING<br />

If it is decided that a complaint of misconduct is justified, a <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing will be arranged.<br />

This will comprise of the following:<br />

11.1 Notice of the Hearing<br />

The employee will be given notice of the <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing a minimum of 7 working days before<br />

the hearing is due to take place. This notice will include:<br />

• Purpose of the hearing<br />

• Nature of the alleged misconduct<br />

• Names of panel members and witnesses<br />

• 2 copies of the Investigation Report<br />

• Invitation to attend with a trade union representative or work colleague<br />

11.2 Right to State Case<br />

At all stages, employees will be entitled to state their case before decisions are reached. If the<br />

employee confirms with good reason that they are unable to attend on the date set for the hearing,<br />

an alternative date will be convened. This will be arranged in conjunction with the employee,<br />

taking into account the employee and their representatives availability. If, in exceptional<br />

circumstances, the employee is unable to attend the hearing within a month of the time set and<br />

agreed between the parties, it may proceed in their absence, but with their representative being<br />

provided with an opportunity to present the employee’s case on their behalf. Hearings will not be<br />

unreasonably delayed due to availability of the employee’s preferred representative.<br />

11.3 Witnesses<br />

It is the responsibility of the parties concerned to arrange for the attendance of their witnesses. In<br />

the case of witnesses who are employees of the Trust, time off work with pay will be granted for<br />

them to attend. Witnesses will only be present at the hearing whilst giving evidence.<br />

It is recognised that in most <strong>disciplinary</strong> cases, it will be inappropriate or impracticable to involve<br />

patients or relatives as witnesses.<br />

11.4 Representation<br />

Employees will have the right to appear personally before a panel, either alone or accompanied by<br />

a colleague or representative of a trade union. Representation rights at a hearing do not extend to<br />

professional legal advisers. If appropriate there may need to be a professional lead on the panel.<br />

The trade union representative or colleague will be allowed to present the employee’s case and<br />

question any witnesses called. The employee should however, respond personally to questions<br />

posed by the investigating team or the panel.<br />

11.5 Failure to Attend the Hearing<br />

When an employee is notified of the date of the hearing, they will be required to confirm their<br />

attendance. Correspondence will be hand delivered to the employee at work in person or sent<br />

recorded delivery to the employee’s home address as detailed on the payroll system. Employees<br />

Page 10 of 30


have a responsibility to ensure that their personal details are up to date and to notify the workforce<br />

team via a change of circumstances form in respect of any change of address.<br />

If the employee fails to confirm their attendance and subsequently does not attend the hearing, a<br />

decision can be taken to continue with the hearing in the employee’s absence and the full range of<br />

sanctions can still be applied.<br />

11.6 Conduct of a Disciplinary Hearing<br />

The hearing will normally be conducted by a <strong>disciplinary</strong> panel chaired by an appropriate senior<br />

manager accompanied by one or more members of management, one of whom will always be a<br />

member of the Human Resources Directorate. For the <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing schedule, see<br />

Appendix 3. If appropriate, a professional lead should also sit on the panel. In cases of personal<br />

conduct involving medical staff, the <strong>disciplinary</strong> panel must include two employees of the Trust<br />

who are medically qualified (in the case of doctors) or dentally qualified (in the case of dentists).<br />

In exceptional circumstances an independent expert may be present to provide technical<br />

information and advice at the request of any party present. The chair of the panel will outline the<br />

reasons for the <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing and ascertain the employee understands the allegations.<br />

Both the employee and the investigating officer will be available for cross-examination by the panel<br />

members and the employee or his/her representative. If witnesses are called in support of the<br />

employee and/or the management case, they will also be available for cross-examination.<br />

The hearing may be adjourned if further investigations prove necessary.<br />

11.7 Findings of the Hearing Panel<br />

On completion of the proceedings, both parties should return to hear the outcome where the chair<br />

of the panel will announce the decision of the panel and the <strong>disciplinary</strong> action to be taken (if any),<br />

where possible. He or she will also give an explanation for that action and will explain the<br />

employee’s rights of appeal under this <strong>procedure</strong>. This will be confirmed in writing within 7 working<br />

days.<br />

In exceptional circumstances, if it is not possible to adhere to this timescale, the chair of the panel<br />

will advise the employee and their representative of the reason for the delay and the expected<br />

timescale for the decision to be communicated.<br />

12. REASONS FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION<br />

Misconduct<br />

Examples of misconduct where a form of warning may be issued or where cumulative or repeated<br />

acts could lead to dismissal are as follows:<br />

• Attendance and Time-keeping<br />

- Continuing failure to comply with attendance and time-keeping requirements e.g.<br />

lateness, regular failure to follow absence reporting <strong>procedure</strong>s as specified in the<br />

Management of Sickness Absence Policy<br />

- Continuing failure to follow <strong>procedure</strong>s for booking and returning from leave<br />

- Absenteeism and unauthorised absence from the workplace including taking unauthorised<br />

or excessive breaks<br />

• Behaviour<br />

- Refusal or failure to follow a legitimate management instruction<br />

- Inappropriate behaviour or abuse of authority towards a colleague or member of the<br />

public or person in the care of the Trust<br />

- Insubordination<br />

Page 11 of 30


- Failure to comply with the provisions of the Trust’s equal opportunities <strong>policy</strong><br />

- Conduct at work which is likely to offend decency<br />

- Conduct which could bring the Trust into disrepute (including inappropriate or offensive<br />

comments placed on social networking sites such as Facebook or Twitter)<br />

- Negligence in the performance of duties<br />

- Misuse of Trust’s facilities<br />

- Abuse of Trust policies including refusal to comply with the Trust’s no-smoking <strong>policy</strong><br />

• Poor Working Practices<br />

- Failure to maintain proper records<br />

- Failure to comply with health and safety requirements<br />

- Failure to follow Trust <strong>procedure</strong>s e.g.<br />

- Drug errors as a result of non compliance with appropriate Trust <strong>policy</strong><br />

- Failure to comply with Trust hand washing protocol<br />

• General<br />

- Misconduct in relation to official documents<br />

• Any other act of misconduct of a similar gravity<br />

Gross Misconduct<br />

Gross misconduct is defined as misconduct of such a serious nature that the Trust is justified in no<br />

longer tolerating the employee’s continued presence at the place of work. An allegation of gross<br />

misconduct will normally lead to suspension, pending an investigation. Instances of gross<br />

misconduct can lead to summary dismissal where the allegations are substantiated. Examples of<br />

gross misconduct where a summary dismissal may be issued are:<br />

• Theft or fraud in the course of employment, including fraudulent completion of expense claims /<br />

time sheets or the falsification of records / qualifications (See Appendix 7 for further details<br />

about fraud cases)<br />

• Physical assault or threatening behaviour/language towards staff, patients or visitors<br />

• Sexual offences / acts of indecency<br />

• Breaches of the Trust’s equal opportunities <strong>policy</strong>, including serious acts of harassment,<br />

discrimination or verbal abuse against employees, service users or the public on grounds of<br />

race, sex, disability or religious belief or any other grounds<br />

• Breach of confidentiality including deliberate misuse of data protection information and/or<br />

deliberate interference with computerised information<br />

• Deliberate and serious damage to Trust property<br />

• Serious breaches of health and safety legislation<br />

• Serious incapability at work bought on by alcohol or illegal drugs<br />

• Intentional misuse of email or the internet and serious breaches of the Trust’s policies on<br />

computer use<br />

• Offences which seriously threaten the security of clients, members of the public, employees or<br />

property or which seriously damages public confidence in the Trust<br />

• Any act or omission reasonably judged to have resulted in a serious breakdown in trust and<br />

confidence<br />

• Serious breaches of the Trust’s Code of Conduct<br />

• Serious insubordination<br />

• Serious negligence / professional misconduct including ill treatment, neglect or abuse of<br />

patients<br />

• Continuous unauthorised absence from work without a valid reason and failure to communicate<br />

with management regarding the ongoing absence (i.e. going awol)<br />

• Failure to disclose any relevant criminal offences prior to employment or any criminal<br />

convictions which occur during employment in a timely way<br />

• Behaviour, including that outside of work, resulting in a criminal conviction, where the nature of<br />

the conviction warrants dismissal because of its employment implications<br />

• Failure to renew professional registration<br />

Page 12 of 30


• Failure to comply with the Trust’s Scheme of Delegation for example by failing to declare<br />

conflicts of interest, or acts of bribery or corruption, for example not declaring gifts or hospitality<br />

– see the Trust’s Anti-Bribery Policy for more information<br />

• Any other act of misconduct of a similar gravity<br />

The above lists are neither exclusive nor exhaustive and there may be actions which do not<br />

appear above but may nevertheless be the subject of <strong>disciplinary</strong> action.<br />

In determining the seriousness of the misconduct, particular regard will be given to the<br />

circumstances of the individual case. Factors, which can influence a decision as to the<br />

seriousness of the offence, may include:<br />

The type and degree of misconduct<br />

The consequences arising from the misconduct<br />

The frequency of the misconduct, and<br />

The level of responsibility of the employee concerned<br />

13. TYPES OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION<br />

No Action<br />

If the hearing results in a finding of ‘no action’, either because the case was found unsubstantiated,<br />

or because of exceptional mitigating circumstances it was decided to take no action, all records of<br />

the hearing and investigation will be removed from the employee’s personal file and destroyed.<br />

Formal Oral Warning<br />

For minor offences where an employee’s conduct does not meet acceptable standards, a formal<br />

oral warning may be given making it clear that further misconduct may render the employee liable<br />

to further <strong>disciplinary</strong> action involving more severe consequences. The issuing of a formal oral<br />

warning should be confirmed in writing. The formal oral warning will remain on the employee’s<br />

personal file for a period of 6 months.<br />

First Written Warning<br />

A first written warning may be given for a more serious offence, or where there has been a<br />

repetition or no satisfactory improvement in the behaviour for which the employee received an oral<br />

warning. This warning will remain on the employee’s personal file for a period of 12 months.<br />

Final Written Warning<br />

The final written warning will apply where there has been a failure to improve behaviour following<br />

previous warnings, or repetition of the same offence. However, if misconduct is sufficiently<br />

serious, it may be appropriate to enter the <strong>procedure</strong> at this stage. The final written warning will<br />

remain on the employee’s personal file for 18 months. In exceptional cases this period may be<br />

extended.<br />

Dismissal<br />

An employee’s contract of employment can be terminated as a result of dismissal in the following<br />

instances:<br />

• Where an employee has a current final written warning on file, and there has been a<br />

repetition of the offence or a further incident at a similar level / similar seriousness but not<br />

necessarily the same misconduct, dismissal will be the outcome, with required period of<br />

notice (pay in lieu)<br />

Or<br />

• If the Disciplinary Hearing panel finds that an act of gross misconduct is established, the<br />

final act will be summary dismissal without notice or pay in lieu of notice<br />

Page 13 of 30


Following dismissal an employee will be required to return all property belonging to the Trust as<br />

soon as is reasonably practicable.<br />

14. REQUIREMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION<br />

Registration is a requirement of certain <strong>NHS</strong> employment, and where employees fail to renew their<br />

registration, <strong>disciplinary</strong> action, including dismissal, may be considered. The onus is on the<br />

employee to renew their registration, which should then be recorded by the employer. Mitigating<br />

circumstances regarding the reason for non-renewal should always be considered. For further<br />

information, please refer to the Policy for the Trust wide Management of Registration Verification<br />

for Permanently Employed Nurses, Midwives and Operating Department Practitioners.<br />

In all cases involving dismissal of professional staff, the Trust will inform the relevant professional<br />

body. It will then be a matter for them to consider if further action is required.<br />

Where <strong>disciplinary</strong> action by a professional body results in a member of staff's name being erased<br />

by the appropriate professional register, then this will provide sufficient reason for termination of<br />

his/her contract, irrespective of any previous <strong>disciplinary</strong> action or decision taken by the Trust.<br />

15. APPEALS PROCEDURE<br />

Every employee has the right to appeal against any <strong>disciplinary</strong> sanction reached at a hearing and<br />

will be reminded of this right at the conclusion of the hearing. The person hearing the appeal will<br />

not have been involved in the initial decision to take <strong>disciplinary</strong> action.<br />

The appeal will normally constitute a re-hearing of the case, except where the appeal grounds<br />

relate solely to the severity of the sanction.<br />

Written notice of appeals must be sent to the Director of Workforce within 21 days of the date of<br />

the letter confirming <strong>disciplinary</strong> action and clearly state the reason for the appeal.<br />

The Director of Workforce will arrange for the appeal hearing to be set up and all parties to be<br />

notified of the date, time and location. The appeal hearing should normally be heard within 8<br />

weeks of the letter requesting the appeal being received.<br />

A member of Human Resources will sit on the panel, and advise the panel on the application of<br />

<strong>procedure</strong>s and current legislation, which is pertinent to the case.<br />

Before any appeal hearing the following documents should be sent to Human Resources no later<br />

than 7 days before the hearing date. The HR representative will then arrange for copies to be<br />

circulated to both sides involved in the appeal as well as the members of the Appeal Panel. No<br />

material, which did not form part of the evidence at the <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing, will be introduced at an<br />

Appeal Hearing unless by joint agreement of the parties concerned:<br />

Managers Statement -This statement should present the circumstances of the case and the<br />

action taken to date, including reasons why the original sanction was given, and list the key<br />

documents to be presented at the hearing as well as who will be called to give evidence to<br />

the hearing as a witness.<br />

Employee’s Statement - This statement may be prepared in conjunction with the<br />

representative and will state the reasons why the appeal is being made. This should list<br />

the key documents to be presented at the appeal as will as any persons who may be called<br />

to give evidence at the hearing as witnesses.<br />

Witnesses<br />

It is the responsibility of the parties concerned to arrange for the attendance of their witnesses. In<br />

the case of witnesses who are employees of the Trust, time off work with pay will be granted for<br />

them to attend. Witnesses will only be present at the hearing whilst giving evidence.<br />

Page 14 of 30


Representation<br />

Employees will have the right to appear personally before an appeal panel, either alone or<br />

accompanied by a colleague or representative of a trade union. Representation rights at a hearing<br />

do not extend to professional legal advisers.<br />

Findings of an Appeal Panel<br />

On completion of the appeal process, the decision of the appeal panel will be final and there will be<br />

no further right of appeal. The employee may apply to the Employment Tribunal for redress if they<br />

so wish.<br />

A record of the proceedings should be made and kept on file. The final decision will be notified to<br />

the employee and trade union within 7 days and reported to the Trust Board. Where an employee<br />

is reinstated, it will be have immediate effect and any loss of earnings as a result of the original<br />

sanction will be reimbursed.<br />

Where an Appeal Panel decides that the original <strong>disciplinary</strong> decision was not within the range of<br />

reasonable responses by management, they have the right to either instruct management to<br />

remove the <strong>disciplinary</strong> sanction imposed or to substitute a different form of <strong>disciplinary</strong> sanction.<br />

This could be a more severe or lesser sanction.<br />

16. KEEPING RECORDS<br />

It is important to keep written records during the <strong>disciplinary</strong> process. Records should include:<br />

• The allegation against the employee<br />

• The employee’s defence<br />

• Findings made and actions taken<br />

• Reason for actions taken<br />

• Whether an appeal was lodged<br />

• The outcome of the appeal<br />

• Any grievances raised during the <strong>procedure</strong><br />

Records should be treated as confidential and be kept no longer than necessary in accordance<br />

with the Data Protection Act 1998, which gives individuals the right to request and have access to<br />

certain personal data. Copies of investigation meeting records should be given to the employee<br />

concerned although in certain circumstances, it may be appropriate to withhold certain information,<br />

for example to protect a witness.<br />

17. REFERENCE REQUESTS FOR EMPLOYEES UNDER INVESTIGATION OR WHERE A<br />

CURRENT DISCPLINARY SANCTION APPLIES<br />

In the event that a reference request is received for an employee who is currently the subject of a<br />

<strong>disciplinary</strong> investigation or for whom there is a current <strong>disciplinary</strong> sanction on file, the manager<br />

should contact HR for advice.<br />

As references must lawfully be accurate and factual, information may be disclosed pertaining to a<br />

current investigation or sanction, or where the employee has been dismissed in accordance with<br />

this <strong>policy</strong>.<br />

18. PROCESS FOR MONITORING COMPLIANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE POLICY<br />

The HR Department will log all <strong>disciplinary</strong> cases including outcomes / appeals and ensure that<br />

any <strong>disciplinary</strong> cases are dealt with as per the <strong>policy</strong>.<br />

Page 15 of 30


19. REVIEW OF THIS PROCEDURE<br />

This <strong>policy</strong> is expected to be reviewed within 3 years but if this is deemed unnecessary the <strong>policy</strong><br />

will remain in force until such time as it is reviewed.<br />

Page 16 of 30


Appendix I<br />

INVESTIGATION OUTLINE – TERMS OF REFERENCE<br />

Hearing Panel Chair<br />

Hearing Panel HR<br />

Support<br />

Investigating Officer<br />

HR Support to<br />

Investigating Officer<br />

Name<br />

Contact No<br />

Was the employee suspended Yes<br />

No<br />

Please provide rationale for decision…………………………………………………………………….<br />

……………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………<br />

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..<br />

Background information …………….…………………………………………………………………..…<br />

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..<br />

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..<br />

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

STANDARDS<br />

ISSUES TO BE INVESTIGATED<br />

If found, whether the above allegations contravene the following documents / policies:<br />

PROCESS<br />

To interview/obtain statements from key individuals.<br />

To review relevant documents and policies<br />

OUTCOME<br />

To produce a report for consideration by (name). Report content to include findings,<br />

conclusions and recommendations.<br />

Deadline for investigation<br />

Terms of Reference<br />

Completed by:<br />

Date:<br />

Page 17 of 30


Appendix 2<br />

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL<br />

DATE<br />

INVESTIGATION REPORT<br />

Allegation Against:<br />

Name, Job Title<br />

Investigating Officer and Report Author: Name, Job Title<br />

Human Resources Support: Name, Job Title<br />

Page 18 of 30


Section Headings:<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Explain why the investigation was requested and the background to the case.<br />

2. Allegation<br />

State the specific allegations being investigated<br />

3. Methodology<br />

Explain who was interviewed as part of the investigation and any other documentation that has<br />

been reviewed.<br />

4. Findings<br />

A summary of the key findings and facts of the case. It is important for investigating officer to<br />

separate fact from comment and personal perceptions. It may be appropriate to refer to<br />

appendices such as notes of meetings with employees, extracts from policies here.<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

A summary statement of the report specifically detailing whether the alleged misconduct has been<br />

substantiated or not<br />

6. Recommendations<br />

A list of recommendations should be included in the report for consideration by the commissioning<br />

manager. These can include:<br />

• Proceed to a <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing without prejudice<br />

• Additional training<br />

• Appraisal and objective setting<br />

• System reviews<br />

Page 19 of 30


Appendix 3<br />

Disciplinary Hearing Schedule<br />

1. Chairperson to introduce all parties and explain the purpose of the hearing and <strong>procedure</strong> to<br />

be followed<br />

2. The employee/representative will be asked to state whether he/she admits or denies the<br />

allegation(s)<br />

A. If the employee admits the allegations:<br />

• Employee and/or representative may present any mitigating circumstances<br />

• Investigating Officer may ask questions about the mitigating circumstances<br />

• Panel may ask questions about the mitigating circumstances<br />

• Investigating Officer may provide a short summary of the management case<br />

• Employee and/or representative may ask questions about the management case<br />

• Both parties are given the opportunity to sum up<br />

B. If the employee denies the allegations:<br />

• Investigating Officer to present the management case<br />

• Employee and/or representative, Chairperson and HR Support may ask questions<br />

of the Investigating Officer<br />

• Investigating Officer to call any witnesses who can be questioned by the parties as<br />

above<br />

• Employee and/or representative to present their case<br />

• Investigating Officer, Chairperson and HR support to ask questions of the<br />

employee<br />

• Employee and/or representative may call witnesses who can be questioned by the<br />

parties as above<br />

• Investigating Officer to sum up their case<br />

• Employee and/or representative to sum up their case<br />

3. Parties to withdraw to enable the panel to deliberate in private. The chairperson must come<br />

to a clear view about the facts, and if they have been disputed, decide on the balance of<br />

probability as to which version of events the panel believes<br />

4. Parties to be recalled to be informed of the panel’s decision if it is possible to make a<br />

decision on the day<br />

5. Letter to be sent to the employee advising or confirming the outcome within 7 working days.<br />

Letter to confirm the reasons for the decision and advise of right of appeal<br />

Page 20 of 30


Appendix 4<br />

Disciplinary Appeal Hearing Schedule<br />

1. Chairperson to introduce all parties and explain the purpose of the appeal hearing and<br />

<strong>procedure</strong> to be followed:<br />

2. The employee / representative will present their grounds for appeal<br />

• If necessary, call and examine any witnesses<br />

• The management representative will have the opportunity to cross examine the<br />

employee and any witnesses<br />

3. The management representative will present the management case<br />

• If necessary, call and examine any witnesses<br />

• The employee and/or representative will have the opportunity to cross examine the<br />

management representative and any witnesses<br />

Members of the panel may ask questions of both parties at any stage of the appeal hearing<br />

4. The employee followed the management representative are given the opportunity to sum up<br />

5. Parties to withdraw to enable the panel to deliberate in private. The chairperson must come<br />

to a clear view about the facts, and if they have been disputed, decide on the balance of<br />

probability as to which version of events the panel believes. If recall is necessary to clear<br />

points of uncertainty, both parties will return.<br />

6. Parties to be recalled to be informed of the panel’s decision if it is possible to make a<br />

decision on the day<br />

7. Letter to be sent to the employee advising or confirming the outcome within 7 working days.<br />

Letter to confirm the reasons for the decision and advise that there is no further right of<br />

appeal<br />

• Where the appeal grounds relate solely to the severity of the sanction the above <strong>procedure</strong> in<br />

sections 2, 3 and 4 will be followed. If the employee appeals for any other reason, the above<br />

<strong>procedure</strong> will be reversed<br />

Page 21 of 30


Appendix 5<br />

Guidelines for Writing a Statement<br />

There are circumstances where you may be called upon to provide a written statement. This will<br />

occur when there has been an incident or complaint that needs to be investigated in line with<br />

Trust <strong>policy</strong> and you were present at the time. Statements should be of a factual nature and<br />

include a description of the events surrounding the incident or complaint.<br />

These guidelines aim to provide you with some simple advice on preparing a statement, which<br />

has been requested for an investigation into an untoward event or complaint that has occurred<br />

during the course of your employment.<br />

There is also a template attached following the guidance, which you may print off and use to write<br />

a statement.<br />

• Assume that the reader of your statement knows nothing of the facts of the case, of the<br />

patient’s medical history or of hospital routines if appropriate. The statement will thus form<br />

a story, which will tell the investigating officer the circumstances of the incident as you<br />

remember them<br />

• Use good quality A4 paper. Do not use scraps of paper, pages from notepads, medical<br />

records sheets, or the backs of documents designed for other purposes<br />

• Statements should ideally be typed but if this is not possible, you must write clearly and in<br />

black ink<br />

• Number the pages. If you use more than one page, ensure the pages are securely<br />

fastened together<br />

• Begin the statement with your name and job title – see template on page 3<br />

• Be clear about the times you were on and off duty on the days in question and about what<br />

you saw and heard. Put events in the order in which they happened, giving precise dates<br />

and times (using am/pm or the 24 hour clock)<br />

• State the location at the time of the incident and name any other witnesses who were<br />

present. When referring to other people in your statement give their full names and job<br />

titles<br />

• Use your own words. Please note that staff are entitled to seek support from their Trade<br />

Union Representative if they wish when writing a statement and should be given enough<br />

time to do so<br />

• Keep to the facts and avoid giving opinions or assumptions. Only include facts or<br />

conversations you have actually witnessed or taken part in. Do not include things that<br />

other people told you happened or conversations reported to you<br />

• Write your statement in simple terms and avoid using jargon or abbreviations. Be as brief<br />

as possible while covering all essential points. When using medical terminology always<br />

explain the meaning<br />

• If you include in your statement any information you have read in patient notes, you should<br />

include references as to where it can be found, e.g. “It is recorded on the 3 rd February<br />

2009 in Mrs Smith’s nursing notes that a request for a CT scan had been sent to<br />

radiology”<br />

Page 22 of 30


• Your statement should be written in the first person, i.e. “I was asked by Staff Nurse Jane<br />

Smith to record Mr Green’s blood pressure”<br />

• Any alterations to your statement should be made by drawing a single line through the<br />

words you wish to change. This should then be initialled<br />

• The final paragraph of your statement should read: “This statement is true to the best of<br />

my knowledge and belief”<br />

• Your statement should be signed and dated. You should also print you full name and job<br />

title<br />

• Keep a copy for your own records<br />

Human Resources Dept<br />

April 2010<br />

Page 23 of 30


Name:........................................................ Job Title: ...................................................<br />

Date and Time of Incident: ..........................................................................................<br />

Location of Incident (ward / dept):...............................................................................<br />

Other Witnesses that were present: ........................................................…...............<br />

……………………………………………………………………………………………………<br />

This section should be used to explain the facts of the incident but avoid giving opinions or<br />

assumptions. Only include facts or conversations you have actually witnessed or taken part<br />

in. Do not include things that other people told you happened or conversations reported to<br />

you. Write your statement in simple terms and avoid using jargon or abbreviations.<br />

........................................................................................................................................<br />

........................................................................................................................................<br />

........................................................................................................................................<br />

........................................................................................................................................<br />

........................................................................................................................................<br />

........................................................................................................................................<br />

........................................................................................................................................<br />

........................................................................................................................................<br />

........................................................................................................................................<br />

........................................................................................................................................<br />

........................................................................................................................................<br />

Continue on another page if necessary<br />

This statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.<br />

Name: ............................................................................................................................<br />

Signature: ......................................................................................................................<br />

Date: ..............................................................................................................................<br />

Page 24 of 30


Appendix 6<br />

Disciplinary Process Flow Chart<br />

Incident occurs<br />

Commissioning Manager appoints<br />

Investigating Officer to undertake<br />

thorough investigation<br />

Clinical incident<br />

If incident relates to patient safety, use<br />

the Incident Decision Tree before<br />

progressing to <strong>disciplinary</strong><br />

investigation<br />

Commissioning Manager to write Terms<br />

of Reference<br />

Investigation to commence with HR<br />

support and be completed within 8<br />

weeks where practicable<br />

Investigation report is produced for the<br />

Commissioning Manager<br />

If no case to answer, employee is<br />

notified in writing and process ends<br />

Commissioning manager to decide if case is<br />

referred to a <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing<br />

If yes, convene a <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing<br />

No action<br />

Oral warning (6<br />

months)<br />

The chair of the panel will announce the<br />

decision and action (if any) to be taken<br />

First written warning<br />

(12 months)<br />

Final written warning<br />

(18 months)<br />

Decision is confirmed in writing within 7 working<br />

days and employee given the right of appeal<br />

Dismissal<br />

If employee appeals, appeal hearing to be<br />

convened and chaired by more senior manager.<br />

There is no further right of appeal<br />

Original decision upheld<br />

Substitute sanction for a<br />

different sanction<br />

Page 25 of 30


Appendix 7<br />

Protocol for dealing with potential cases of fraud<br />

1 Introduction<br />

1.1 This document has been established to enable effective interaction between the Local<br />

Counter Fraud Specialist (LCFS) and the Human Resource Department (HR). It is<br />

necessary that the co-operation between these two functions can be demonstrated; hence<br />

this protocol has been established.<br />

1.2 The protocol provides a framework for liaison between the LCFS and HR whenever a<br />

potential fraud is highlighted. Applying the protocol will ensure that the full range of<br />

sanctions available to the organisation can be considered at the earliest opportunity<br />

(criminal, <strong>disciplinary</strong> and civil). To pursue these sanctions effectively there needs to be a<br />

close and supportive liaison between the LCFS and the Human Resource functions. This<br />

includes the sharing of information to avoid both duplication of effort and potentially<br />

compromising the use of other sanctions by well-intentioned actions. The Director of<br />

Finance should be consulted whenever there is any conflict between the two roles<br />

regarding a course of action to be taken.<br />

1.3 This protocol is not a definitive procedural document as this would not be possible as each<br />

individual investigation may highlight specific issues requiring an adaptation to the<br />

<strong>procedure</strong> outlined herein. However, despite any case-by-case adaptations that may be<br />

required, the organisation should remain mindful of the need to conduct potential fraud<br />

investigations in accordance with criminal and civil law and all relevant aspects of<br />

employment law. Furthermore guidance outlined in the <strong>NHS</strong> Counter Fraud and<br />

Corruption Manual and <strong>policy</strong> document ‘Applying Appropriate Sanctions Consistently’,<br />

which includes specialist and legal advice on how to conduct investigations to ensure the<br />

full range of sanctions are considered and can be applied in all fraud or corruption<br />

investigations should be fully adhered to.<br />

1.4 To maintain a high deterrent factor against <strong>NHS</strong> fraud, it is important to consider the full<br />

range of sanctions available. This may result in criminal sanctions being applied at the<br />

same time as any civil and/or <strong>disciplinary</strong> sanctions. Whenever sanctions are to be run<br />

simultaneously (termed parallel sanctions) close liaison must exist between the LCFS and<br />

HR, as findings from one investigation might be important to the success of another.<br />

Generally, the criminal investigation will determine the actions and timing of other related<br />

investigations, this is due to the higher burden of proof placed upon criminal investigations<br />

and the resultant due process legislation that covers the gathering of evidence. However,<br />

the fact that a criminal investigation is being conducted does not negate the fact that a<br />

decision can be made on a <strong>disciplinary</strong> or civil matter, but rather this action should be<br />

taken after consultation with the investigator leading on the criminal investigation.<br />

2 HR Liaison Responsibilities<br />

2.1 Meet regularly with the LCFS to discuss requirements and monitor the interaction<br />

process ensuring it remains effective and fit for purpose.<br />

2.2 Assist the LCFS, as appropriate, in any fraud reviews undertaken to detect and prevent<br />

potential fraud from entering the organisations systems.<br />

2.3 All referrals received that may have an element of suspected fraud MUST be reported<br />

immediately to the LCFS or the Director of Finance. This can be verbally, in writing or e-<br />

mail. If reported direct to the LCFS, then the LCFS will ensure that the Director of<br />

Finance is notified at the earliest opportunity.<br />

Page 26 of 30


2.4 Inform the LCFS of any possible system weaknesses, which could allow fraud or<br />

corruption to occur. This includes weaknesses discovered as part of any HR<br />

investigation that did not warrant the commencement of a fraud investigation.<br />

2.5 Meet regularly with the LCFS for updates on investigations whenever parallel sanctions<br />

are being conducted to ensure a flow of information and avoid potential duplication of<br />

effort.<br />

2.6 Inform the LCFS whenever Health and Safety risks (i.e. not holding appropriate clinical<br />

qualifications) or allegations relating to vulnerable clients, must take precedence over<br />

any potential fraud investigation that may be undertaken.<br />

2.7 Allow the LCFS, whenever possible, to interview the suspect under caution before a<br />

<strong>disciplinary</strong> investigation / process takes place. In this way first reactions to the<br />

allegations are taped which can then be used for both in both criminal and <strong>disciplinary</strong><br />

investigations. Please note that while information can be shared it does not negate the<br />

need for a correct and proper investigation for each sanction being considered, for<br />

example information might be shared from an interview under caution but this<br />

information should be discussed with the person at a separate <strong>disciplinary</strong> interview,<br />

which is bound by its own rules of conduct.<br />

2.8 When appropriate to do so, and in liaison with the LCFS, undertake <strong>disciplinary</strong><br />

sanctions even if a criminal sanction may still be ongoing. Feedback to the LCFS the<br />

outcome of such <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing as this may have an impact on the criminal<br />

sanction investigation.<br />

2.9 Where necessary, and available, provide sufficient evidence to the LCFS in order that a<br />

fraud investigation and criminal sanctions can be pursued.<br />

2.10 Liaise with the Director of Finance and LCFS whenever a decision has been made to<br />

suspend an employee who is subject to a fraud investigation. The decision to suspend<br />

will rest with an appropriate Executive Director / Senior Manager with the support of a<br />

Senior HR Colleague, but any decision should not be taken without consultation with the<br />

LCFS as HR action may adversely affect the success of a criminal investigation, for<br />

example it may warn the suspected person and allow them time to cover up the fraud or<br />

corruption.<br />

2.11 It is important that HR inform the LCFS of all decisions taken in <strong>disciplinary</strong> cases where<br />

the LCFS has considered ‘parallel sanctions’. The LCFS is required to provide brief<br />

details of the outcome of such cases on the <strong>NHS</strong> CFS Compound Indicator selfassessment<br />

made by the health body at the end of the financial year.<br />

3 LCFS Liaison Responsibilities<br />

3.1 Meet at agreed regular intervals with the Deputy Director of Workforce to discuss liaison<br />

requirements.<br />

3.2 Provide a bespoke presentation to HR staff explaining the role of the LCFS and the<br />

interaction between the counter fraud and HR.<br />

3.3 Acknowledge receipt of HR referrals and arrange to meet with an appropriate HR<br />

representative to discuss. The LCFS will then undertake an initial and timely review to<br />

establish the validity or otherwise of the allegation.<br />

3.4 Meet at regular intervals with HR for updates on investigations whenever parallel<br />

sanctions are being conducted to ensure a flow of information and avoid potential<br />

duplication of effort.<br />

Page 27 of 30


3.5 Liaison with the relevant <strong>NHS</strong> CFS Operational Service Team throughout the<br />

investigation passing relevant advice onto HR for consideration.<br />

3.6 Where necessary, and appropriate to do so, the LCFS will provide sufficient evidence to<br />

HR in order that a <strong>disciplinary</strong> investigation can be taken forward as appropriate.<br />

3.7 Concluding reports will be issued at the closure of any investigation undertaken by the<br />

LCFS in accordance with the requirements outlined in the <strong>NHS</strong> Counter Fraud and<br />

Corruption Manual.<br />

4 Outline of Investigation Process<br />

4.1 From the initial review undertaken by the LCFS, the following will be considered (see<br />

Appendix A):<br />

• No evidence of fraud found (4.2)<br />

• No evidence of fraud found but system controls need to be strengthened (4.3)<br />

• No evidence of fraud found but matter needs to be referred back to HR for potential<br />

<strong>disciplinary</strong> sanction to be considered (4.4)<br />

• Reasonably held suspicion/information/evidence of suspected fraud received<br />

requiring criminal investigation (4.5).<br />

4.2 No case to answer or no evidence of fraud found<br />

The LCFS will inform the Director of Finance that no fraudulent action has been<br />

identified. Human Resources will also be notified of this decision. A concluding report will<br />

be written by the LCFS and issued accordingly.<br />

4.3 No evidence of fraud found but system controls need to be strengthened<br />

The LCFS will inform the Director of Finance and HR of this decision.<br />

A concluding report will be issued with recommendations to strengthen controls in<br />

identified areas of weakness. This report will be distributed in accordance with the<br />

requirements outlined in Directions. The recommendations will be followed up by the<br />

LCFS as part of future fraud prevention work.<br />

4.4 No evidence of fraud found but the referral is returned to HR for potential <strong>disciplinary</strong><br />

sanction to be considered<br />

The LCFS will inform the Director of Finance and HR of this decision.<br />

If the LCFS does not find evidence of fraud but a breach of <strong>policy</strong>/<strong>procedure</strong>s may have<br />

occurred, then the LCFS will meet with a member of HR to discuss the findings and pass<br />

on the file of evidence gathered to date as disclosure allows. HR should use this file of<br />

evidence to establish if further consideration/action is required.<br />

The LCFS will take no further part in any additional investigation undertaken by HR<br />

regarding a suspected breach of <strong>procedure</strong>s. However, the LCFS may be called to a<br />

<strong>disciplinary</strong> hearing as a witness if required.<br />

A concluding report will be issued with recommendations to strengthen controls in<br />

identified areas of weakness. This report will be distributed in accordance with the<br />

requirements outlined in Directions. The recommendations will be followed up by the<br />

LCFS as part of future fraud prevention work<br />

4.5 Case to answer criminal investigation undertaken and appropriate sanction considered<br />

Page 28 of 30


The LCFS will liaise with the Director of Finance and conduct an investigation in<br />

accordance with investigative legislation such as the Police and Criminal Evidence Act<br />

1984 (PACE) and the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act (CPIA). Instruction<br />

outlined in the <strong>NHS</strong> Counter Fraud and Corruption Manual must be followed.<br />

Confidentiality will be respected during the course of the investigation.<br />

Criminal investigations will be undertaken in a timely and professional manner so that<br />

the pursuit of other potential sanctions is not compromised.<br />

Regular case meetings will be held so that the LCFS can keep the Director of Finance<br />

and the designated HR Manager updated as the investigation progresses and discuss<br />

any potential sanctions that may be pursued.<br />

If parallel sanctions are being undertaken, the LCFS will meet regularly with the HR<br />

Manager to share information and avoid any duplication of effort. An investigation plan<br />

setting out the requirements for the parallel sanction will be established and maintained<br />

throughout the investigation process.<br />

In liaison with the Director of Finance, HR, <strong>NHS</strong> CFS Operational Fraud Manager and<br />

LCFS the health body will consider the following three sanctions in cases where there is<br />

prima facie evidence of <strong>NHS</strong> fraud:<br />

‣ Criminal – A criminal sanction is pursued where evidence of offences has been<br />

obtained so that relevant punitive sanctions and redress can be sought. This<br />

sanction can only be pursued if agreed by the Director of Finance and the <strong>NHS</strong><br />

Operational Fraud Manager.<br />

‣ Civil - Where it is cost effective and desirable for the purpose of deterrence, it<br />

may be decided that civil redress is the most appropriate course of action. It is then<br />

the responsibility of the Trust to use the civil law to recover any losses.<br />

‣ Disciplinary – Disciplinary <strong>procedure</strong>s are designed to test whether a person<br />

should be permitted to practice or continue their employment. Recovery should be<br />

considered whenever this action is pursued where the organisation has suffered a<br />

financial loss due to inappropriate actions. Those conducting <strong>disciplinary</strong> hearings<br />

should never make an express or implied statement that criminal proceedings will<br />

not be undertaken. Dismissal of an employee need not wait until the conclusion of<br />

any simultaneous criminal sanction that the LCFS may be undertaking.<br />

Either one or a combination of these sanctions can be pursued. This will be assessed on<br />

a case-by-case basis.<br />

4.6 The LCFS will be responsible for establishing a prosecution file.<br />

4.7 A concluding report will be issued with recommendations to strengthen controls in<br />

identified areas of weakness. This report will be distributed in accordance with the<br />

requirements outlined in Directions. The recommendations will be followed up by the<br />

LCFS as part of future fraud prevention work<br />

5 Associated risks if effective interaction is not in place<br />

5.1 The organisation may not be able to pursue all appropriate sanctions. This may lead to the<br />

perception that the organisation does not take fraud seriously in that appropriate deterrent<br />

penalties will not be applied in full for perpetrators of <strong>NHS</strong> fraud. Without appropriate<br />

deterrent factors they may be an enhanced risk of fraud within the organisation.<br />

5.2 Disciplinary hearings may be compromised if the organisation has failed to follow, and<br />

evidence compliance to instructions and the local counter fraud <strong>policy</strong> when dealing with<br />

potential fraud or corruption activity.<br />

Page 29 of 30


Referral Process for Potential Fraud Investigations<br />

HR Referral<br />

LCFS<br />

Initial Review<br />

No case to<br />

answer<br />

Meeting between Director<br />

of Finance (DoF) and LCFS<br />

Case to<br />

answer<br />

LCFS to advise<br />

HR and handover<br />

any evidence<br />

obtained for HR to<br />

use in any internal<br />

<strong>disciplinary</strong><br />

investigation<br />

LCFS and HR<br />

to provide<br />

regular updates<br />

to each other<br />

during<br />

investigation<br />

LCFS to advise HR<br />

& DoF if<br />

investigation reveals<br />

that the use of<br />

parallel sanctions<br />

may be appropriate<br />

in accordance with<br />

<strong>policy</strong>. HR to carry<br />

out simultaneous<br />

internal investigation<br />

Sanction Decision<br />

CRIMINAL<br />

CIVIL<br />

DISCIPINARY<br />

Prosecution file<br />

prepared by<br />

LCFS/<strong>NHS</strong> CFS.<br />

Consider County<br />

Court/Small Claims in<br />

consultation with Trust<br />

solicitor<br />

HR appoints<br />

Investigating Manager<br />

and follows <strong>disciplinary</strong><br />

<strong>procedure</strong>. LCFS may<br />

be witness<br />

Redress

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!