19.01.2015 Views

The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities

The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities

The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

occurred after each group <strong>of</strong> papers was presented so that it usually addressed<br />

issues common to each set and <strong>of</strong>ten expanded on themes established earlier in<br />

previous sessions. At each session <strong>of</strong> the workshop, about half the time available was<br />

devoted to discussion. Two different note takers recorded the points made. In<br />

addition to the verbal discussion, participants were asked to submit written<br />

recommendations for research, practice and policy for each discussion period. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

wrote their recommendations during or immediately after the discussion on the<br />

papers. About 130 individual recommendations were submitted. Clearly,<br />

participants took that task very seriously. At the end <strong>of</strong> the Workshop, a wrap up<br />

session focused on a summary and final discussion.<br />

In order to summarize the m ain points <strong>of</strong> the discussion and the recommendations in<br />

a concise and meaningful way, we used content analysis to group them into 10 main<br />

themes:<br />

1. 1. Increasing standardization in methods<br />

2. 2. Increasing use <strong>of</strong> functional approaches to research<br />

3. 3. Better organization <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

4. 4. Identifying research priorities<br />

5. 5. Developing computer simulation models<br />

6. 6. Incorporation behavioral and social factors<br />

7. 7. Improving sampling<br />

8. 8. Improving cost effectiveness <strong>of</strong> research<br />

9. 9. Improving data collection methods<br />

10.Increasing communications and dialogue<br />

Each one <strong>of</strong> these themes will be discussed below by summarizing the discussion<br />

related to them, reporting specific recommendations and elaborating on the<br />

recommendations with further observations.<br />

1. INCREASING STANDARDIZATION AND CONSENSUS IN RESEARCH AND PRACTICE<br />

Much discussion focused on the limitations <strong>of</strong> previous research. In older studies, the<br />

methods used were so different from study to study that it is difficult to interpret or<br />

utilize the results. In particular, since most previous studies used small samples, the<br />

differences in methods make it impossible to combine findings to create a database<br />

that allows a higher level <strong>of</strong> generalizability. By standardizing methods, the results<br />

<strong>of</strong> small or focused studies could be pooled to establish larger databases.<br />

Moreover, it would be possible to compare the results <strong>of</strong> studies completed with<br />

different populations, e.g., different disabilities, different age groups, etc. Other<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Anthropometrics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Disability</strong> | 22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!