19.01.2015 Views

The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities

The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities

The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

predictive validity before they can be used with confidence.<br />

6. INCORPORATING BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL FACTORS<br />

Several <strong>of</strong> the participants at the conference argued that social science research<br />

methods are needed to understand many anthropometric issues. In particular, such<br />

research can help us understand the perspective <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities, how<br />

social and cultural factors influence anthropometrics, and the differences between<br />

groups. <strong>The</strong>se specific recommendations were made on how such research could<br />

benefit the field:<br />

• Consider the perspectives <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities. Not only is it important<br />

to insure that the critical issues <strong>of</strong> concern to the population with disabilities<br />

are addressed in anthropometric studies, it is also important, given limited<br />

resources, to avoid devoting resources those issues that are not perceived to<br />

be problematic to the target population. Thus, studies that would uncover<br />

priorities for giving research attention to specific issues would be very<br />

valuable.<br />

• Anthropometric research should consider the role that social and cultural<br />

factors play in successful task performance. This includes understanding the<br />

role <strong>of</strong> age, education, ethnic origin and other such variables.<br />

• Utilize psychophysical scales in combination with observable measures <strong>of</strong><br />

performance. Typical outcome measures are complete/incomplete, maximum<br />

reach or comfortable reach. More sophisticated measures a re needed.<br />

Scales that evaluate difficulty, satisfaction, acceptance and other<br />

psychological measures can help us to understand how people evaluate<br />

demands that the environment makes on human abilities. Special emphasis<br />

should be given to the psychological evaluation <strong>of</strong> effort during manual<br />

exertions. This seems to be a major knowledge gap.<br />

• Validate the findings <strong>of</strong> laboratory studies through field research. This could<br />

include the use <strong>of</strong> 1.) psychophysical methods to rate successful performance<br />

and 2.) ethnographic research studies to understand how individuals interpret<br />

tasks and decide on the level <strong>of</strong> performance they will strive to attain.<br />

Predictive validity would be strengthened if personal perceptions were<br />

studied along with observed performance. Using data fusion methods to<br />

handle multiple data inputs like this would help to justify code requirements.<br />

• Set design criteria based on subjective response rather than purely<br />

observation <strong>of</strong> behavior. In particular, it is important to consider acceptable<br />

<strong>of</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> effort, independence and productivity. Simple ability to complete<br />

a task is not sufficient for understanding whether it can be done<br />

satisfactorily. Ideally, the criteria for successful performance should be<br />

determined by the target population.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Anthropometrics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Disability</strong> | 32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!