The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities
The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities
The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• Strength is a critical variable in reaching ability. It is important to understand<br />
the relationship <strong>of</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> object being moved and strength to task<br />
performance.<br />
• Free reach may not be too useful to measure because people are always<br />
using or grasping objects while they reach. However, even free reach must<br />
overcome gravity so strength always plays a role. This suggests the need to<br />
measure the body and body segment mass to understand reach in a<br />
biomechanical context.<br />
• Research should take into consideration “functional” reach posture. For<br />
example, static and relaxed positions may be more appropriate for<br />
measuring functional reach than extended postures. Head movement in<br />
functional tasks is <strong>of</strong>ten overlooked but it can play an important role,<br />
especially if the task involves eye-hand coordination.<br />
• Studies <strong>of</strong> reaching abilities and grasping tasks for people with disabilities<br />
should accommodate different methods <strong>of</strong> reaching, including two handed<br />
reach as well as one handed reach, the use <strong>of</strong> one hand to brace the other<br />
or the use <strong>of</strong> a wheelchair to stabilize the body while reaching.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> fact that people may not be fully independent should be recognized in<br />
research. When selecting samples or reporting results, independent<br />
populations should be separated from dependent populations.<br />
3. BETTER ORGANIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE<br />
Discussion on this theme focused on organizing knowledge with a view toward<br />
making it more useable in design practice. Participants were concerned with the<br />
organization <strong>of</strong> the existing knowledge base as well as new knowledge that will be<br />
generated by future research. <strong>The</strong> recommendations include approaches to<br />
organizing research data and findings as well as the form <strong>of</strong> design criteria.<br />
Recommendations included ideas for organizing data for improving our knowledge<br />
base and access to research findings:<br />
• Existing technical standards are rigid and incomplete. Performance criteria<br />
could be developed for design based on person, environment, tasks and<br />
level <strong>of</strong> assistance to be provided. This approach would be richer and more<br />
useful.<br />
• <strong>The</strong>re is a need to review current literature and research as well as past<br />
comparisons <strong>of</strong> existing studies. While Bruce Bradtmiller completed a<br />
comparative report, it would be very useful to hold a seminar where the<br />
existing work could be discussed further by a broader group <strong>of</strong> experts that<br />
includes designers, human modelers and others.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Anthropometrics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Disability</strong> | 26