The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities
The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities
The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10. INCREASING COMMUNICATIONS AND DIALOGUE<br />
An important underlying theme <strong>of</strong> the discussion was continuing and expanding<br />
communications and dialogue about the issues addressed at the Workshop. Participants<br />
realized that the anthropometrics <strong>of</strong> disability is important to many stakeholders, not all <strong>of</strong><br />
whom were well represented at this first gathering. <strong>The</strong>y also recognized that the<br />
Workshop was only a beginning to what could become a long-term endeavor fueled by<br />
mutual interests. While the Workshop was focused on discussion among experts, those<br />
present understood the importance <strong>of</strong> education and outreach to other interested parties.<br />
In particular, they voiced an interest in educating both research sponsors and “consumers,”<br />
design and rehabilitation n pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, manufacturers, code <strong>of</strong>ficials and developers,<br />
and end users <strong>of</strong> products and environments.<br />
Recommendations for increasing communications and dialogue included:<br />
• Work with the Access Board, NIDRR and the Department <strong>of</strong> Justice to develop research plans. <strong>The</strong>se plans could be based<br />
on patterns <strong>of</strong> complaints and needs for information that surface during the process <strong>of</strong> resolving complaints.<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Although the Access Board is focused on regulatory activity, other agencies could<br />
take the lead in developing best practice as opposed to minimum standards. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
could be leadership documents that could point the way toward changes in the<br />
regulations over time. For example, performance based standards that utilize<br />
computer models, use <strong>of</strong> outcome measures that focus on comfort or task<br />
effectiveness, etc.<br />
Use existing data, best practice information and expert opinions to augment<br />
codes. Such information could be used to develop more exceptions in warranted<br />
cases and variations that would be appropriate to certain facility types. This<br />
would be a preliminary step before enough data is available to revise codes to<br />
reflect the differences in user populations and environmental context.<br />
Future communications and dialogue could focus on specific issues that are <strong>of</strong> concern to a<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> practitioners and researchers, including engineers, rehabilitation therapists,<br />
human factors specialists and designers. Some <strong>of</strong> these include:<br />
• Developing standardized postures for measurement <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities<br />
• How data fusion and data mining could be applied to functional anthropometry<br />
• Effective ways to present structural and functional anthropometric data for use by<br />
designers<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Anthropometrics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Disability</strong> | 40