19.01.2015 Views

The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities

The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities

The Anthropometrics of Disability - Designing Accessible Communities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10. INCREASING COMMUNICATIONS AND DIALOGUE<br />

An important underlying theme <strong>of</strong> the discussion was continuing and expanding<br />

communications and dialogue about the issues addressed at the Workshop. Participants<br />

realized that the anthropometrics <strong>of</strong> disability is important to many stakeholders, not all <strong>of</strong><br />

whom were well represented at this first gathering. <strong>The</strong>y also recognized that the<br />

Workshop was only a beginning to what could become a long-term endeavor fueled by<br />

mutual interests. While the Workshop was focused on discussion among experts, those<br />

present understood the importance <strong>of</strong> education and outreach to other interested parties.<br />

In particular, they voiced an interest in educating both research sponsors and “consumers,”<br />

design and rehabilitation n pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, manufacturers, code <strong>of</strong>ficials and developers,<br />

and end users <strong>of</strong> products and environments.<br />

Recommendations for increasing communications and dialogue included:<br />

• Work with the Access Board, NIDRR and the Department <strong>of</strong> Justice to develop research plans. <strong>The</strong>se plans could be based<br />

on patterns <strong>of</strong> complaints and needs for information that surface during the process <strong>of</strong> resolving complaints.<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Although the Access Board is focused on regulatory activity, other agencies could<br />

take the lead in developing best practice as opposed to minimum standards. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

could be leadership documents that could point the way toward changes in the<br />

regulations over time. For example, performance based standards that utilize<br />

computer models, use <strong>of</strong> outcome measures that focus on comfort or task<br />

effectiveness, etc.<br />

Use existing data, best practice information and expert opinions to augment<br />

codes. Such information could be used to develop more exceptions in warranted<br />

cases and variations that would be appropriate to certain facility types. This<br />

would be a preliminary step before enough data is available to revise codes to<br />

reflect the differences in user populations and environmental context.<br />

Future communications and dialogue could focus on specific issues that are <strong>of</strong> concern to a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> practitioners and researchers, including engineers, rehabilitation therapists,<br />

human factors specialists and designers. Some <strong>of</strong> these include:<br />

• Developing standardized postures for measurement <strong>of</strong> people with disabilities<br />

• How data fusion and data mining could be applied to functional anthropometry<br />

• Effective ways to present structural and functional anthropometric data for use by<br />

designers<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Anthropometrics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Disability</strong> | 40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!