19.01.2015 Views

Robin Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry Solutions

Robin Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry Solutions

Robin Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry Solutions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Robin</strong> Hartshorne’s <strong>Algebraic</strong> <strong>Geometry</strong> <strong>Solutions</strong><br />

by Jinhyun Park<br />

Chapter III Cohomology Section 4 Cohomology of Affine spaces<br />

4.1.<br />

4.2.<br />

4.3.<br />

4.4.<br />

4.5.<br />

4.6.<br />

4.7.<br />

4.8.<br />

4.9.<br />

4.10. Let X be a nonsingular variety over an algebraically closed field k, and let<br />

F be a coherent sheaf on X. Show that there is a one-to-one correspondence<br />

between the set of infinitesimal extensions of X by F (II, Ex. 8.7) up to isomorphism,<br />

and the group H 1 (X, F ⊗ T ), where T is the tangent sheaf of X (II,<br />

§8). [Hint: Use (II, Ex. 8.6) and (4.5)]<br />

Proof. Let U = {U i } i∈I be an affine open cover of X. Note that since X is nonsingular, so<br />

is each U i . Let (X ′ , O X ′) be an infinitesimal extension of X by F, that is, there is a scheme<br />

X ′ with an ideal sheaf I ≃ F as O X -modules, such that I 2 = 0, (X, O X ′/I) ≃ (X, O X ) as<br />

ringed spaces, and a short exact sequence of O X -modules<br />

0 → I → O X ′ → O X → 0.<br />

Since each U i is nonsingular and affine, by Ex.II-8.7, the above short exact sequence<br />

restricts to a split exact sequence on U i , where the splitting is given by a lifting α i :<br />

O X | Ui → O X ′| Ui .<br />

On each U ij = U i ∩ U j , that is affine since X is separated, we have two liftings α i | Uij ,<br />

α j | Uij : O X | Uij → O X ′| Uij , and they differs by a section β ij in Der k (O X (U ij ), I(U ij )) so<br />

that on U ij we have<br />

α i − α j = β ij .<br />

Notice that β ij can be seen as a section in (F ⊗ T )(U ij ) via isomorphisms<br />

Der k (O X (U ij ), I(U ij )) ≃ Hom OX/k (U ij )(Ω X/k (U ij ), I(U ij )) ≃ (F⊗Ω ∗ X/k )(U ij) ≃ (F⊗T )(U ij ).<br />

Restricting all the above sections onto U ijk = U i ∩ U j ∩ U k , we thus obtain<br />

β ij + β jk + β ki = (α i − α j ) + (α j − α k ) + (α k − α i ) = 0,<br />

and {β ij } gives a cocycle of the Čech complex ˘C • (U, F ⊗ T ) in degree 1.<br />

For a different choice of liftings µ i : O X | Ui → O X ′| Ui for each U i , as above we have the<br />

corresponding sections β ′ ij of Der k(O X (U ij ), I(U ij )) with µ i − µ j = β ′ ij on U ij, and with<br />

β ′ ij + β′ jk + β′ ki = 0 on U ijk.<br />

1


2<br />

Applying the Ex. II-8.6- (a) again to the pair of liftings α i and µ i on U i , we have sections<br />

ξ i of Der k (O X (U i ), I(U i )) for each U i with α i − µ = ξ i , that can also be seen as a section of<br />

F ⊗ T on U i . Then, on U ij we have<br />

β ij − β ′ ij = (α i − α j ) − (µ i − µ j ) = ξ i − ξ j ,<br />

thus the cocycles {β ij } and {β ij ′ } give the same cohomology class in ˘H 1 (U, F ⊗ T ). This<br />

last group is isomorphic to H 1 (X, F ⊗ T ) by (4.5). The converse is easy. This finishes the<br />

proof.<br />

□<br />

4.11.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!