Chapter 2 Principles of Stereoscopic Depth Perception and ...
Chapter 2 Principles of Stereoscopic Depth Perception and ...
Chapter 2 Principles of Stereoscopic Depth Perception and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.2. Human depth perception<br />
seen, a phenomenon that is known as diplopia. A simple demonstration<br />
<strong>of</strong> this is to hold one finger up at arm’s length <strong>and</strong> another finger at half<br />
arm’s length. Fixating with both eyes on the farthest finger will make the<br />
closest one appear double, <strong>and</strong> vice versa. The largest disparity at which<br />
fusion can occur is dependent on a number <strong>of</strong> factors. Duwaer & van den<br />
Brink (1981) showed that the diplopia threshold is dependent on the subject<br />
tested, the amount <strong>of</strong> training a subject received, the criterion used for<br />
diplopia (unequivocal ’singleness’ <strong>of</strong> vision vs. unequivocal ’doubleness’<br />
<strong>of</strong> vision), <strong>and</strong> the conspicuity <strong>of</strong> the disparity.<br />
Although limits vary somewhat across studies, some representative disparity<br />
limits for binocular fusion can be given. For small sized stimuli<br />
(i.e., smaller than 15 minutes <strong>of</strong> arc) the range <strong>of</strong> disparity for the foveal<br />
area is about +/-10 minutes <strong>of</strong> arc, while at 6 degrees eccentricity the range<br />
increases to around +/-20 minutes <strong>of</strong> arc. For large stimuli (1.0 - 6.6 degrees)<br />
the range for the foveal region is about +/-20 minutes <strong>of</strong> arc, that is,<br />
two times the range for smaller stimuli (Patterson & Martin 1992). However,<br />
most individuals have an appreciation <strong>of</strong> depth beyond the diplopia<br />
threshold, the region where single vision has been lost. Up to 2 degrees <strong>of</strong><br />
overall disparity between two images is tolerated before the sensation <strong>of</strong><br />
depth is lost (Howard & Rogers 1995).<br />
<strong>Stereoscopic</strong> vision greatly enhances our ability to discriminate differences<br />
in depth, particularly at close distances. Estimates <strong>of</strong> the effective range <strong>of</strong><br />
stereopsis vary across the literature, but it is clear that stereoscopic information<br />
becomes less effective as distance increases <strong>and</strong> retinal disparities<br />
become smaller. For distances beyond 30 meters disparities become negligible.<br />
<strong>Stereoscopic</strong> vision is also necessarily limited to the central region<br />
<strong>of</strong> the visual field where the two retinal images overlap, the binocular visual<br />
field. With both eyes open the maximum width <strong>of</strong> the total visual<br />
field is approximately 200 degrees. The binocular field is about 120 degrees<br />
wide, flanked on either side by uniocular fields <strong>of</strong> approximately 40<br />
degrees each.<br />
<strong>Stereoscopic</strong> sensitivity is remarkably good at regions close to the<br />
horopter: people can detect a disparity <strong>of</strong> just a few seconds <strong>of</strong> arc. Better<br />
stereo-acuity performance is reported for crossed than for uncrossed disparities<br />
(Woo & Sillanpaa 1979). The only monocular cue that provides a<br />
similar degree <strong>of</strong> depth resolution is motion parallax created by moving<br />
the head from side to side (Howard & Rogers 1995). In fact, monocular<br />
motion parallax <strong>and</strong> binocular disparity are closely related, since temporally<br />
separated successive views <strong>of</strong> an environment can in principle<br />
55