20.01.2015 Views

Simultaneous UV Spectrophotometric Method for Estimation of ...

Simultaneous UV Spectrophotometric Method for Estimation of ...

Simultaneous UV Spectrophotometric Method for Estimation of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Asian J. Research Chem. 2(1): Jan.-March, 2009<br />

,<br />

ISSN 0974-4169<br />

www.ajrconline.org<br />

RESEARCH ARTICLE<br />

<strong>Simultaneous</strong> <strong>UV</strong> <strong>Spectrophotometric</strong> <strong>Method</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Estimation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Losartan<br />

Potssium and Amlodipine Besylate in Tablet Dosage Form.<br />

Priyanka R Patil*, Sachin U Rakesh, PN Dhabale, and KB Burade<br />

Govt. College <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy, Karad- 415 124, (Satara), Maharashtra, India<br />

*Corresponding Author E-mail: priyapatil5586@rediffmail.com<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Two simple, accurate, precise, reproducible, requiring no prior separation and economical procedures <strong>for</strong> simultaneous<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> Losartan Potassium and Amlodipine Besylate in tablet dosage <strong>for</strong>m have been developed. First method<br />

employs <strong>for</strong>mation and solving <strong>of</strong> simultaneous equation using 208 nm and 237.5 nm as two analytical wavelengths<br />

<strong>for</strong> both drugs in methanol. The second method is Q value analysis based on measurement <strong>of</strong> absorptivity at 242.5 nm<br />

(as an iso-absorptive point) and 237.5 nm. Losartan Potassium and Amlodipine Besylate at their respective max 208<br />

nm and 237.5 nm and at isoabsorptive point 242.5 nm shows linearity in a concentration range <strong>of</strong> 2-20 g/mL.<br />

Recovery studies range from 99.95% <strong>for</strong> Losartan Potassium and 99.33% <strong>for</strong> Amlodipine Besylate in case <strong>of</strong><br />

simultaneous equation method and 102.93% <strong>for</strong> Losartan Potassium and 101.02% <strong>for</strong> Amlodipine Besylate in case <strong>of</strong><br />

Q - analysis method confirming the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the proposed method. The proposed method is recommended <strong>for</strong><br />

routine analysis since it is rapid, simple, accurate and also sensitive and specific by no heating and no organic solvent<br />

extraction.<br />

KEY WORDS: Losartn Potassium, Amlodipine Besylate, max , <strong>Simultaneous</strong> equation method, Q analysis<br />

INTRODUCTION:<br />

Losartan (I, 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-1-[p-(o-1H-tetrazol- 5-<br />

ylphenyl) benzyl]-imidazole-5methanol monopotassium salt)<br />

is a highly selective, orally active, non-peptide angiotensin II<br />

receptor antagonist indicated <strong>for</strong> the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

hypertension. It has a more potent active metabolite<br />

EXP3174 (II, 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-1-[2-(1H-tetrazol-5 yl)<br />

biphenyl- 4-yl) methyl] imidazole-5-carboxyl acid) 1 . The<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> Losartan has been carried out in tablets by<br />

HPLC, capillary electrophoresis and super-critical fluid<br />

chromatography 2,3 , in urine by gas chromatography- mass<br />

spectrometry 4 and, simultaneously with its active metabolite<br />

in biological fluids, by HPLC 5- 10 .<br />

Amlodipine, chemically, 2-[(2- aminoethoxy) methyl]- 4-<br />

(2-chlorophenyl) -1, 4-dihydro- 6-methyl-3, 5-<br />

pyridinedicarboxylic acid 3-ethyl, 5-methyl ester, is an antihypertensive<br />

and an antianginal agent in the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> the<br />

besylate salt, Amlodipine besylate. It is not <strong>of</strong>ficial in any<br />

Pharmacopoeia. Various analytical methods have been<br />

reported <strong>for</strong> the assay <strong>of</strong> Amlodipine besylate 11 in pure<br />

<strong>for</strong>m as well as in pharmaceutical <strong>for</strong>mulations.<br />

Received on 20.02.2009 Modified on 13.04.2009<br />

Accepted on 24.05.2009 © AJRC All right reserved<br />

Asian J. Research Chem. 2(2): April.-June, 2009 page 183-187<br />

They include high per<strong>for</strong>mance liquid chromatography, 12-17<br />

reversed phase high per<strong>for</strong>mance liquid chromatography, 18-<br />

21 high per<strong>for</strong>mance thin layer chromatography, 22-25 gas<br />

chromatography, 26 gas chromatography–mass<br />

spectrometry, 27<br />

liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry 28<br />

and fluorimetry, 29 derivative spectroscopy, 30,31<br />

simultaneous multicomponent mode <strong>of</strong> analysis and<br />

difference spectrophotometry 32-34 .<br />

By these two methods no <strong>UV</strong> spectrophotometric study<br />

on Losartan and Amlodipine in tablet dosage <strong>for</strong>m in<br />

pharmaceutical preparations has been found in literature<br />

survey. There was only one method has been reported 35<br />

<strong>for</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> Losartan and Amlodipin in tablet by<br />

absorption correction method, which prompted to pursue<br />

the present work. The objective <strong>of</strong> the present work is to<br />

develop and validate new analytical methods <strong>for</strong><br />

simultaneous determination <strong>of</strong> Losartan Potassium and<br />

Amlodipine Besylate in tablet dosage <strong>for</strong>m. This<br />

communication <strong>for</strong>ms the first report <strong>of</strong> two simple,<br />

sensitive and reproducible methods <strong>for</strong> the simultaneous<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> Losartan Potassium and Amlodipine<br />

Besylate from combined dosage <strong>for</strong>m.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS:<br />

Materials:<br />

Spectral runs were made on a Shimadzu <strong>UV</strong>-Visible<br />

spectrophotometer, model- 1700 (Japan) was employed<br />

183


with spectral bandwidth <strong>of</strong> 0.5 nm and wavelength<br />

accuracy <strong>of</strong> ± 0.3 nm with automatic wavelength<br />

corrections with a pair <strong>of</strong> 10 mm quartz cells. Glasswares<br />

used in each procedure were soaked overnight in a<br />

mixture <strong>of</strong> chromic acid and sulphuric acid rinsed<br />

thoroughly with double distilled water and dried in hot air<br />

oven. Amlodipine besylate reference standard was kindly<br />

provided by Shreya Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. Aurangabad<br />

(M. S.) while Losartan Potassium was provided by Lupin<br />

Research Park, Pune. The pharmaceutical preparations <strong>of</strong><br />

combination <strong>of</strong> Losartan and Amlodipine that is Alsartan<br />

AM tablet (ARISTO, Mumbai). Methanol <strong>of</strong> analytical<br />

reagent grade was purchased by Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd.<br />

(India). All the solutions were protected <strong>for</strong> light and were<br />

analyzed on the day <strong>of</strong> preparations.<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> common solvent:<br />

Methanol <strong>of</strong> analytical reagent grade was selected as<br />

common solvent <strong>for</strong> developing spectral characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> drug. The selection was made after assessing the<br />

solubility <strong>of</strong> both the drugs in different solvents.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> Standard Drug Solution:<br />

Standard stock solutions containing Losartan Potassium<br />

(LP) and Amlodipine besylate (AB) were prepared<br />

individually by dissolving 2.5 mg <strong>of</strong> LP and quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

AB equivalent to Amlodipine base 2.5 mg separately in<br />

20 ml <strong>of</strong> methanol. It was then sonicated <strong>for</strong> 10 minutes<br />

and the final volume <strong>of</strong> both the solutions were made up<br />

to 50 ml with methanol to get stock solutions containing<br />

50 g/ mL each <strong>of</strong> LP and AB in two different 50 ml<br />

volumetric flasks.<br />

Asian J. Research Chem. 2(1): Jan.-March, 2009<br />

,<br />

A 1 a x 2 – A 2 a x 1<br />

Cy = a y 1 ax 2 - ay 2 a x 1<br />

…………Eq. (ii)<br />

Where, A 1 and A 2 are absorbances <strong>of</strong> mixture at 208 nm<br />

and 237.5 nm respectively, ax 1 and ax 2 are absorptivities<br />

<strong>of</strong> LP at 1 and 2 respectively and ay 1 and ay 2 are<br />

absorptivities <strong>of</strong> AB at 1 and 2 respectively. Cx and Cy<br />

are concentrations <strong>of</strong> LP and AB respectively.<br />

<strong>Method</strong> II (Absorbance ratio or Q-analysis method):<br />

From the overlain spectrum <strong>of</strong> LP and AB, two<br />

wavelengths were selected one at 242.5 nm which is the<br />

isoabsorptive point <strong>for</strong> both the drugs and the other at<br />

237.5 nm which is max <strong>of</strong> AB . The absorbances <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sample solutions prepared in a similar manner as in the<br />

previous method, were measured and the absorptivity<br />

values <strong>for</strong> both drugs at the selected wavelengths were<br />

also calculated. The method employs Q values and the<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> drugs in sample solution were<br />

determined by using the following <strong>for</strong>mula,<br />

For LP<br />

Q 0 – Q 2 a 1<br />

C 1 = ×<br />

Q 1 –Q 2 A<br />

For AB<br />

Q 0 – Q 1 a 2<br />

C 2 = ×<br />

Q 2 –Q 1 A<br />

Where,<br />

Absorbance <strong>of</strong> sample at 237.5 nm<br />

Q 0 =<br />

Absorbance <strong>of</strong> sample at 242.5 nm<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> Absorption Maxima:<br />

By appropriate dilution <strong>of</strong> two standard drug solutions<br />

with methanol, solutions containing 10 g ml -1 <strong>of</strong> LP<br />

and 10 g ml -1 <strong>of</strong> AB were scanned separately in the<br />

range <strong>of</strong> 200- 400 nm to determine the wavelength <strong>of</strong><br />

maximum absorption <strong>for</strong> both the drugs. LP and AB<br />

showed absorbance maxima at 208 nm ( 1 ) and 237.5<br />

nm ( 2) respectively. The overlain spectra showed max<br />

<strong>of</strong> both drugs and also isoabsorptive points at 242.5 nm<br />

(Fig. 1).<br />

<strong>Method</strong> I (<strong>Simultaneous</strong> equation method):<br />

Two wavelengths selected <strong>for</strong> the method are 208 nm<br />

and 237.5 nm that are absorption maximas <strong>of</strong> LP and AB<br />

respectively in methanol. The stock solutions <strong>of</strong> both<br />

the drugs were further diluted separately with methanol<br />

to get a series <strong>of</strong> standard solutions <strong>of</strong> 2-20 g /mL<br />

concentrations. The absorbances were measured at the<br />

selected wavelengths and absorptivities (A 1%, 1 cm)<br />

<strong>for</strong> both the drugs at both wavelengths were determined<br />

as mean <strong>of</strong> three independent determinations.<br />

Concentrations in the sample were obtained by using<br />

following equations-<br />

A 1 ay 2 – A 2 a y 1<br />

Cx =<br />

…………Eq. (i)<br />

ax 1 ay 2 -ax 2 ay 1<br />

Q 1 =<br />

Q 2 =<br />

Absorptivity <strong>of</strong> LP at 237.5 nm<br />

Absorptivity <strong>of</strong> LP at 242.5nm<br />

Absorptivity <strong>of</strong> AB at 237.5 nm<br />

Absorptivity <strong>of</strong> AB at 242.5nm<br />

A = Absorbance <strong>of</strong> sample at isoabsorptive point,<br />

a 1 and a 2 = Absorptivities <strong>of</strong> LP and AB respectively at<br />

isoabsorptive point.<br />

Application <strong>of</strong> the proposed method <strong>for</strong> the<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> LP and AB in tablets:<br />

Twenty tablets <strong>of</strong> marketed <strong>for</strong>mulation Alsartan AM<br />

(ARISTO, Mumbai) containing LP 50 mg and AB<br />

equivalent to Amlodipine base 5 mg were weighted, and<br />

finely powdered. For analysis <strong>of</strong> drug, a standard addition<br />

method was used. An accurately weighted 2.5 mg <strong>of</strong> pure<br />

AB was added to finely powdered samples to bring the<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> AB in linearity range. With this addition, the<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> LP and AB in the samples was brought to 1:1.<br />

Quantity <strong>of</strong> powder equivalent to 5 mg <strong>of</strong> LP and 5 mg <strong>of</strong><br />

Amlodipine base was weighed and dissolved in 40 mL <strong>of</strong><br />

methanol and sonicated <strong>for</strong> 10 minutes. Then the solution<br />

184


Asian J. Research Chem. 2(1): Jan.-March, 2009<br />

,<br />

Table 1: Linear regression analysis <strong>of</strong> calibration curves with their respective absorptivity values.<br />

Parameter<br />

<strong>Method</strong> I<br />

<strong>Method</strong> II<br />

LP AB LP AB<br />

Beer’s law limit (g ml -1 ) 2-20 2-20 2-20 2-20<br />

Correlation coefficient (r) 0.9988 0.9991 0.9993 0.9970<br />

Molar absorptivity (lit/mole/cm) 42942.37 19435.23 21396.44 18694.30<br />

Sandell's sensitivity<br />

0.0107 0.0210 0.021546 0.021872<br />

(mcg/Sq.cm/0.001)<br />

Slope 0.0955 0.0468 0.04602 0.04325<br />

Intercept -0.0063 -0.0158 -0.017533 -0.02353<br />

Table 2: Results <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> laboratory samples.<br />

Analyte<br />

<strong>Method</strong> I<br />

<strong>Method</strong> II<br />

LP AB LP AB<br />

% Conc. Estimated (Mean ± S.D.) 99.79 ± 0.13 99.74 ± 0.15 99.85 ± 0.03 101.09 ± 0.82<br />

Coefficient <strong>of</strong> variance 0.0008 0.0002 0.0001 0.0004<br />

Average <strong>of</strong> three determinations; R.S.D.; Relative Standard Deviation.<br />

Table 3: Results <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> tablet samples.<br />

<strong>Method</strong> Drug Label Claim % Label Claim ± R. S. D. Coefficient <strong>of</strong> variance % Recovery* (Mean ±<br />

R. S. D)<br />

LP 5 103.39 ± 1.224 0.0155 99.95± 0.97<br />

I AB 50 105.06± 3.25 0.111 99.33± 0.72<br />

LP 5 103.93± 2.66 0.072 102.93± 0.21<br />

II AB 50 105.05± 3.25 0.111 101.02± 0.37<br />

Average <strong>of</strong> three determinations; R.S.D.; Relative Standard Deviation<br />

Table 4: Results <strong>of</strong> intermediate precisions.<br />

.<br />

<strong>Method</strong> I<br />

<strong>Method</strong> II<br />

Day<br />

% Label claim estimated<br />

(Mean ± % R.S.D.)<br />

% Label claim estimated<br />

<br />

(Mean ± % R.S.D.)<br />

LP AB LP AB<br />

Intraday 105.83<br />

± 0.73<br />

100.04<br />

± 0.43<br />

100.87<br />

± 0.56<br />

112.5<br />

± 2.2<br />

Interday 106.86<br />

± 1.27<br />

108.05<br />

± 1.71<br />

99.25<br />

± 1.76<br />

100.6<br />

± 0.36<br />

was filtered through whatman filter paper no. 41 and then<br />

final volume <strong>of</strong> the solution was made up to 50 ml with<br />

methanol to get a stock solution containing 100 g ml -1 <strong>of</strong> LP<br />

and 100 g ml -1 AB. Appropriate aliquots <strong>of</strong> LP and AB<br />

within the Beer’s law limit were taken. In <strong>Method</strong> I, the<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> both LP and AB were determined by<br />

measuring the absorbance <strong>of</strong> the sample at 208 nm and 237.5<br />

nm. Values were substituted in the respective <strong>for</strong>mula to<br />

obtain concentrations.<br />

For <strong>Method</strong> II, the concentration <strong>of</strong> both LP and AB<br />

were determined by measuring absorbance <strong>of</strong> the sample<br />

at 242.5 nm and 237.5 nm and values were substituted in<br />

the respective <strong>for</strong>mula to obtain concentrations. Results<br />

<strong>of</strong> tablet analysis are shown in Table 3.<br />

VALIDATION:<br />

The method was validated according to ICH Q2B<br />

guidelines <strong>for</strong> validation <strong>of</strong> analytical procedures in order to<br />

determine the linearity, sensitivity, precision and accuracy<br />

<strong>for</strong> the analyte.<br />

Accuracy:<br />

To ascertain the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the proposed methods,<br />

recovery studies were carried out by standard addition<br />

method at three different levels (80%, 100% and 120%).<br />

Percent recovery <strong>for</strong> LP and AB, by both the methods,<br />

was found in the range <strong>of</strong> 101.44% to 100.17%.<br />

Linearity:<br />

The linearity <strong>of</strong> measurement was evaluated by<br />

analyzing different concentration <strong>of</strong> the standard<br />

solution <strong>of</strong> LP and AB. For simultaneous equation<br />

method and Q analysis, the Beer- Lambert’s<br />

concentration range was found to be 2-20 g/ml <strong>for</strong> LP<br />

and AB.<br />

Precision:<br />

Precision was studied to find out intra and inter-day<br />

variations in the test method <strong>of</strong> LP and AB. Calibration<br />

curves prepared in medium were run in triplicate in same day<br />

and <strong>for</strong> three days. %RSD (relative standard deviation) were<br />

185


calculated which should be less than 2 %. The results are<br />

tabulated in Table 4.<br />

Asian J. Research Chem. 2(1): Jan.-March, 2009<br />

,<br />

respectively. We are also thankful to Mr. Shreeniwas<br />

Mohite sir <strong>for</strong> his moral support and guidance.<br />

Fig.1: Overlain spectra <strong>of</strong> LP and AB. Overlain spectra <strong>of</strong><br />

Losartan potassium (RM) and Amlodipine besylate (AB) in<br />

methanol.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:<br />

The overlain spectra <strong>of</strong> LP and AB exhibit max <strong>of</strong> 208<br />

nm and 237.5 nm <strong>for</strong> LP and AB respectively which are<br />

quite separated from each other. Additionally one<br />

isoabsorptive point was observed at 242.5 nm. This<br />

wavelength was selected <strong>for</strong> simultaneous estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

LP and AB <strong>for</strong> Q value analysis and it is assume to be<br />

sensitive wavelength. Standard calibration curves <strong>for</strong> LP<br />

and AB were linear with correlation coefficients (r)<br />

values in the range <strong>of</strong> 0.9970- 0.9993 at all the selected<br />

wavelengths and the values were average <strong>of</strong> three<br />

readings with standard deviation in the range <strong>of</strong> 0.13 –<br />

0.82. The calibration curves were repeated three times in<br />

a day and the average % RSD was found to be 0.645 <strong>for</strong><br />

LP and 1.31 <strong>for</strong> AB, similarly the method was repeated<br />

<strong>for</strong> three different days and average % RSD was found<br />

to be 1.51 <strong>for</strong> LP and 1.03 <strong>for</strong> AB. The accuracy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

method was con<strong>for</strong>med by recovery studies from tablet<br />

at three different levels <strong>of</strong> standard additions; recovery<br />

in the range <strong>of</strong> 95 – 110% justifies the accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />

method.<br />

CONCLUSION:<br />

The most striking feature <strong>of</strong> this method is its simplicity<br />

and rapidity, non- requiring- consuming sample<br />

preparations such as extraction <strong>of</strong> solvents, heating,<br />

degassing which are needed <strong>for</strong> HPLC procedure. These<br />

are new and novel methods and can be employed <strong>for</strong><br />

routine analysis in quality control analysis. The described<br />

methods give accurate and precise results <strong>for</strong><br />

determination <strong>of</strong> Losartan potassium and Amlodipine<br />

besylate mixture in marketed <strong>for</strong>mulation.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:<br />

The authors are thankful to the Principal Dr. S. B. Bhise,<br />

Govt. College <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy, Karad, Dist. Satara,<br />

Maharashtra <strong>for</strong> providing necessary facilities and<br />

Shreya Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. Aurangabad and Lupin<br />

Research Park, Pune (M. S.) <strong>for</strong> providing the gift<br />

sample <strong>of</strong> Amlodipine Besylate and Losartan Potassium<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

1. Michelle Polinko, Kerry Riffel, Hengchang Song, Man-<br />

Wai Lo. <strong>Simultaneous</strong> determination <strong>of</strong> losartan and<br />

EXP3174 in human plasma and urine utilizing liquid<br />

chromatography/ tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharma<br />

and Biomed Anal. 2003; 33: 73- 84.<br />

2. Williams R.C.; Alasandro M.S.; Fasone V.L.; Boucher R.J.;<br />

Edwards J.F. Comparison <strong>of</strong> liquid chromatography,<br />

capillary electrophoresis and super-critical fluid<br />

chromatography in the determination <strong>of</strong> Losartan<br />

Potassium drug substance in Cozaar tablets. J Pharma<br />

Biomed Anal. 1996; 14 (11): 1539-1546.<br />

3. Mccarthy K. E, Qingxi Wang , Tsai E. W. Gilbert R. E.<br />

Ip D. P. Brooks M. A. Determination <strong>of</strong> losartan and its<br />

degradates in COZAAR tablets by reversed-phase highper<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

thin-layer chromatography. J Pharm Biomed<br />

Anal. 1998; 17: 671–677.<br />

4. H.H. Maurer, T. Kraemer, J.W. Arlt Screening <strong>for</strong> the<br />

Detection <strong>of</strong> Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors,<br />

Their Metabolites, and AT II Receptor Antagonists. Ther.<br />

Drug Monit. 1998; 20: 706–713.<br />

5. C.I. Furtek, M. W. Lo. <strong>Simultaneous</strong> determination <strong>of</strong> a<br />

novel angiotensin II receptor blocking agent, losartan, and<br />

its metabolite in human plasma and urine by highper<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

liquid chromatography. J Chroma: Biomed<br />

Appli. 1992; 573 (2): 295-301.<br />

6. H. Lee, H.O. Shim, H.S. Lee. <strong>Simultaneous</strong><br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> Losartan and Active Metabolite<br />

EXP3174 in Rat Plasma by HPLC with Column<br />

Switching H. Lee 1 / H. O. Shim 1 / H. S. Lee 2.<br />

Chromatographia. 1996; 42: 39–42.<br />

7. A.F.M. El Walily, S.F. Belal, E.A. Heaba, et al. An<br />

improved method <strong>for</strong> the simultaneous determination <strong>of</strong><br />

losartan and its major metabolite, EXP3174, in human<br />

plasma and urine by high-per<strong>for</strong>mance liquid<br />

chromatography with fluorescence detection J Pharma<br />

Biomed Anal. 1997; 15 (7): 1021-1029.<br />

8. Farthing D, Sica D, Fakhry I, Pedro A, Gehr TWB.<br />

Simple high-per<strong>for</strong>mance chromatographic method <strong>for</strong><br />

determination <strong>of</strong> losartan and E-3174 metabolite in<br />

human plasma, urine and dialysate. J Chromatogr B 1997;<br />

704: 374-378.<br />

9. Andrea Soldner, Hildegard Spahn-Langguth, Ernst<br />

Mutschler. HPLC assays to simultaneously determine the<br />

angiotensin-AT 1 antagonist losartan as well as its main and<br />

active metabolite EXP 3174 in biological material <strong>of</strong><br />

humans and rats.<br />

J Pharma Biomed Anal. 1998; 16 (5): 863-873.<br />

10. Andrea Soldner, Hildegard Spahn-Langguth, Dieter Palm,<br />

Ernst Mutschler. A radioreceptor assay <strong>for</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

AT 1 -receptor antagonists: Correlation with<br />

complementary LC data reveals a potential contribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> active metabolites. J Pharma Biomed Anal. 1998; 17<br />

(1): 111-124.<br />

11. Argekar A P, Powar S G. <strong>Simultaneous</strong> determination <strong>of</strong><br />

atenolol and amlodipine in tablets by high-per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

thin-layer chromatography. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.<br />

2000; 21: 1137–1142.<br />

12. Halker U P, Bhandari N P, Rane S H. High per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

liquid chromatographic simultaneous determination <strong>of</strong><br />

amlodipine and enalapril maleate from pharmaceutical<br />

preparation. Indian Drugs. 1988; 35: 168.<br />

186


13. Shimooka K, Sawada Y, Tatematsu H. Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

amlodipine by a sensitive high per<strong>for</strong>mance liquid<br />

chromatography method with amperometric detection. J.<br />

Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1989; 7: 1267.<br />

14. Yeung P K F, Mosher S J, Pollack PT. High per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

liquid chromatography assay <strong>for</strong> amlodipine: chemical<br />

stability and pharmacokinetics in rabbits. J. Pharm.<br />

Biomed. Anal. 1991; 9: 565.<br />

15. Patki R V, Tamhanker C P, Tipnis H P. Simple and rapid<br />

high per<strong>for</strong>mance liquid chromatographic estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

amlodipine in pharmaceutical dosage <strong>for</strong>ms. Indian Drugs<br />

1994; 31: 560.<br />

16. Josefsson M, Zackrisson A L, Norlander B. Sensitive high<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance liquid chromatographic analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

amlodipine in human plasma with amperometric detection<br />

and a single step solid phase sample preparation. J.<br />

Chromatogr. B; Biomed. Appl. 1995; 672; 310.<br />

17. Shang F, Shang K. Determination <strong>of</strong> amlodipine in tablets<br />

by HPLC. ZhoggnoYiyao Gangye Zazhi. 1996; 27: 411.<br />

18. European Pharmacopoeia, 3 rd ed. Council <strong>of</strong> Europe,<br />

Strasbourg, 2001. pp. 431, (supplement).<br />

19. Avadhanulu A B, Srinivas J S, Anjaneyulu Y. Reversed<br />

phase HPLC determination <strong>of</strong> amlodipine in drugs and its<br />

pharmaceutical dosage <strong>for</strong>ms. Indian Drugs. 1996; 33: 36.<br />

20. Sankar S R, Nanjan M J, Vasudevan M. <strong>Simultaneous</strong><br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> atenolol and amlodipine in <strong>for</strong>mulations by<br />

reversed phase-HPLC. Ind J. Pharm. Sci. 1997; 59: 171.<br />

21. Dhorda V J, Shetkar N B. Reversed phase liquid<br />

chromatographic determination <strong>of</strong> ramipril and<br />

amlodipine in tablets. Indian Drugs. 1999; 36: 638.<br />

22. Chandrashekhar T G, Rao P S N , Smrita K. Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

amlodipine besylate by HPTLC with fluorimetric<br />

detection: a sensitive method <strong>for</strong> assay <strong>of</strong> tablets. J.<br />

Planar. Chromatogr. Mod. TLC. 1994; 7: 458.<br />

23. Pandya K K, Satia M, Gandhi T P. Detection and<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> total amlodipine by high per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

thin layer chromatography: A useful technique <strong>for</strong><br />

pharmacokinetic studies. J. Chromatogr. B; Biomed.<br />

Appl. 1995; 667: 315.<br />

24. Ilango K, Kumar P B, Prasad V RV. Simple and rapid<br />

high per<strong>for</strong>mance thin layer chromatographic<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> amlodipine in pharmaceutical dosage<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 1997; 59: 336.<br />

Asian J. Research Chem. 2(1): Jan.-March, 2009<br />

,<br />

25. Agrekar A P, Powar S G. <strong>Simultaneous</strong> determination <strong>of</strong><br />

atenolol and amlodipine in tablets by high per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

thin layer chromatography. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.<br />

2000; 21: 1137.<br />

26. Bres<strong>for</strong>d A P, Marcrac P V, Stopher D A. Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

amlodipine in human plasma by gas chromatography. J.<br />

Chromatogr. 1987; 420: 178.<br />

27. Feng Y, Meng Q, Guo X. Human plasma amlodipine GC–<br />

MS determination, Guandong Yaoxueyuan Xuebao. 1998;<br />

14 (111): 118.<br />

28. Yasuda T, Tanaka M, Iba K. Quantitative determination<br />

<strong>of</strong> amlodipine in serum by liquid chromatography with<br />

atmospheric pressure chemical ionization tandem mass<br />

spectrometry. J.Mass Spectrom. 1996; 31: 879.<br />

29. Mohamed Y E, Naglaa M E K, Bahia A M, Nasshwa G<br />

M. Fluorimetric determination <strong>of</strong> amiodrone, amlodipine<br />

and propafenone. Bull. Fac. Pharm. 1998; 36: 1.<br />

30. Prasad C V N, Parihar C, Chowdhary T R S.<br />

<strong>Simultaneous</strong> determination <strong>of</strong> atenolol–amlodipine and<br />

haloperidol– trihexaphenidyl in combined tablet<br />

preparations by derivative spectroscopy. Pharm.<br />

Pharmacol. Commun. 1998; 4: 325.<br />

31. Prasad C V N, Saha R N, Parimoo P. <strong>Simultaneous</strong><br />

determination <strong>of</strong> amlodipine–enalapril maleate and<br />

amlodipine–lisinopril in combined tablet preparations by<br />

derivative spectrophotometry. Pharm. Pharmacol.<br />

Commun. 1999; 5: 383.<br />

32. Jain H K, Agrawal R K. <strong>Spectrophotometric</strong> methods <strong>for</strong><br />

simultaneous determination <strong>of</strong> amlodipine besylate and<br />

lisinopril in tablets. Indian Drugs. 2000; 37: 196.<br />

33. Mashru C R, Parikh P P. Development <strong>of</strong> a method <strong>for</strong><br />

simultaneous determination <strong>of</strong> amlodipine besylate and<br />

lisinopril. East. Pharm. 2000; 43: 111.<br />

34. Khopade S A, Jain N K. Difference spectrophotometric<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> amlodipine besylate. Indian drugs. 2000;<br />

37: 351.<br />

35. Topale P. R. Gaikwad N. J. Tajane M. R. <strong>Simultaneous</strong><br />

<strong>UV</strong>- spectrophotometric estimation <strong>of</strong> losartan potassium<br />

and Amlodipine in tablet. Indian drugs. 2003; 40 (2): 119-<br />

121.<br />

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!