02.02.2015 Views

Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method of ...

Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method of ...

Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Asian J. Research Chem. 2(2): April.-June, 2009<br />

,<br />

ISSN 0974-4169<br />

www.ajrconline.org<br />

RESEARCH ARTICLE<br />

<strong>Development</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Validation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>UV</strong> <strong>Spectrophotometric</strong> <strong>Method</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cefuroxime<br />

Axetil in Bulk <strong>and</strong> Pharmaceutical Formulation.<br />

Santosh Shelke* 1 , Santosh Dongre 1 , Amit Rathi 2 , Dinesh Dhamecha 2 , Saifee Maria 2 <strong>and</strong> Mohd<br />

Hassan G Dehghan 2<br />

1<br />

Yash Institute <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy, South city, Bajaj Nagar, Post Box no. 968,Waluj,Aurangabad-431134<br />

2<br />

Y.B.Chavan College <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy, Maulana Azad Education Trust, Dr. Rafiq Zakaria Marg,Aurangabad-431001<br />

*Corresponding Author E-mail: santoshshelke24@yahoo.com<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

A simple, accurate, cost effective <strong>and</strong> reproducible spectrophotometric method has been developed for the estimation<br />

<strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil in bulk <strong>and</strong> pharmaceutical dosage form. <strong>UV</strong> spectrophotometric method, which is based on<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> absorption at maximum wavelength 281nm.The percentage recovery <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil ranged<br />

from (99.97 ± 0.3969) in pharmaceutical dosage form. The developed method was validated with respect to linearity,<br />

accuracy (recovery), precision <strong>and</strong> specificity. Beers law was obeyed in the concentration range <strong>of</strong> 4-28µg/ml having<br />

line equation y = 0.0346x + 0.0566 with correlation coefficient <strong>of</strong> 0.9999. Results <strong>of</strong> the analysis were validated<br />

statistically <strong>and</strong> by recovery study.<br />

KEYWORDS: <strong>UV</strong> spectrophotometry, cefuroxime axetil<br />

INTRODUCTION:<br />

Chemically cefuroxime axetil is (RS)-1-hydroxyethyl (6R,<br />

7R)-7-[2-(2-furyl) glyoxyl-amido]-3-(hydroxymethyl)-8-<br />

oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]-oct-2-ene-2-carboxylate,<br />

72-(Z)-(O-methyl-oxime), 1-acetate 3-carbamate (figure<br />

no.1) ,is semisynthetic ,broad spectrum cephalosporin<br />

antibiotic for oral administration. It is indicated in case <strong>of</strong><br />

pharyngitis / tonsillitis, acute bacterial otitis media, acute<br />

bacterial maxillary sinusitis, chronic bronchitis, urinary<br />

tract infection, lyme disease 1 .<br />

Analysis is an important component in the formulation<br />

development <strong>of</strong> any drug molecule. A suitable <strong>and</strong><br />

validated method has to be available for the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

drug(s) in the bulk, in drug delivery systems, from release<br />

dissolution studies <strong>and</strong> in biological samples. If a suitable<br />

method, for specific need, is not available then it becomes<br />

essential to develop a simple, sensitive, accurate, precise,<br />

reproducible method for the estimation <strong>of</strong> drug samples<br />

The estimation <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil by mercurimetric<br />

method 2 , high performance liquid chromatography<br />

[HPLC] 3 , high performance thin layer chromatography<br />

[HPTLC] 4 <strong>and</strong> spectr<strong>of</strong>lurimetric method 5 is reported in<br />

literature.<br />

Received on 25.04.2009 Modified on 30.04.2009<br />

Accepted on 21.06.2009 © AJRC All right reserved<br />

Asian J. Research Chem. 2(2): April.-June, 2009 page 222-224<br />

Although simultaneous <strong>UV</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime<br />

axetil <strong>and</strong> probenecid has been reported by Chaudari et.<br />

al. 6 , but single estimation <strong>of</strong> this drug has not been<br />

reported in bulk <strong>and</strong> in pharmaceutical formulation. Thus<br />

the present study was undertaken to develop <strong>and</strong> validate<br />

a simple, sensitive, accurate, precise, <strong>and</strong> reproducible<br />

U.V method for cefuroxime axetil.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHOD:<br />

Instrument <strong>and</strong> materials:<br />

Instrument used were Perkin Elmer double beam<br />

<strong>UV</strong>/Visible Spectrophotometer <strong>and</strong> schimadzu AX200<br />

analytical balance. Cefuroxime axetil pure drug was<br />

obtain from Aurobindo Pharma LTD. Hyderabad as gift<br />

sample with 99.99% w/w assay value <strong>and</strong> was used<br />

without further purification. All chemicals <strong>and</strong> reagents<br />

used were <strong>of</strong> analytical grade.<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> media:<br />

Main criteria for media selection are solubility <strong>and</strong><br />

stability, i.e. drug should be soluble as well as stable for<br />

sufficient time in selected media. Though the <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

reported media for this drug is 0.07 M pH 7.0 phosphate<br />

buffer but in provided experimental condition drug is not<br />

giving clear solution in pH 7.0 phosphate buffer, same<br />

time drug is soluble in methanol, so for present work<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> methanol <strong>and</strong> pH 7.0 phosphate buffer in<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> 2: 8 has been selected as analytical media.<br />

222


Table No.1 - Calibration Curve parameter.<br />

S. No. Concentration<br />

( µg/ml)<br />

Absorbance ±<br />

SD<br />

1 4 0.1965 ± 0.03 1.7<br />

2 8 0.3349 ± 0.037 1.1<br />

3 12 0.4708 ± 0.037 1.7<br />

4 16 0.6114 ± 0.035 1.5<br />

5 20 0.745 ± 0.023 1.3<br />

6 24 0.889 ± 0.057 2.6<br />

7 28 1.0288 ± 0.037 3.6<br />

Asian J. Research Chem. 2(2): April.-June, 2009<br />

,<br />

%Relative<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

deviation<br />

Figure No.1 - Chemical structure <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil 1 .<br />

Figure No.2 - Determination <strong>of</strong> max <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil<br />

by <strong>UV</strong> scanning.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard stock solution:<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard drug solution <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil was prepared<br />

by dissolving 10mg cefuroxime axetil in 20ml methanol<br />

<strong>and</strong> transfered it to 100ml volumetric flask <strong>and</strong> volume<br />

was made upto mark with phosphate buffer pH 7.0 to<br />

obtain stock solution <strong>of</strong> 100µg/ml concentration. For<br />

obtaining clear solution, solution was ultrasonicated.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> calibration curve:<br />

Calibration curve was prepared in 2:8 (methanol: 7.0 pH<br />

phosphate buffer) at max 281 nm using Perkin Elmer <strong>UV</strong>visible<br />

spectrophotometer. For this stock solution <strong>of</strong> 100<br />

µg/ml was prepared. Serial dilution <strong>of</strong> 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24<br />

<strong>and</strong> 28 µg/ml were prepared <strong>and</strong> absorbance was taken at<br />

max 281 nm. Averages <strong>of</strong> such 8 sets <strong>of</strong> values were<br />

taken for st<strong>and</strong>ard calibration curve, <strong>and</strong> solutions were<br />

scanned in the range <strong>of</strong> 200-400 nm against blank. The<br />

calibration curve was plotted. The optical characteristics<br />

are summarized in Table no.1<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> sample solution:<br />

Ten tablets were weighed <strong>and</strong> powdered. The amount <strong>of</strong><br />

tablet powder equivalent to 10 mg <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil<br />

was weighed accurately <strong>and</strong> transfer to 20 ml methanol<br />

<strong>and</strong> kept for 15 min with frequent shaking <strong>and</strong> volume<br />

was made up to 100 ml mark with phosphate buffer pH<br />

7.0.The solution was then filtered through whatmann<br />

filter paper # 41. This filtrate was diluted suitably with<br />

solvent (20% v/v methanol in phosphate buffer pH 7.0) to<br />

get the solution <strong>of</strong> 16µg/ml concentration .The<br />

absorbance was measured against blank. The drug content<br />

<strong>of</strong> the preparation was calculated using st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

calibration curve. Amount <strong>of</strong> drug estimated by this<br />

method is given in Table no.3<br />

RESULT AND DISCUSSION:<br />

Precision:<br />

Assay <strong>of</strong> method precision (intra-day precision) was<br />

evaluated by carrying out three independent assays <strong>of</strong> test<br />

samples <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil. The intermediate precision<br />

(inter-day precision) <strong>of</strong> the method was also evaluated<br />

using two different analysts, systems <strong>and</strong> different days in<br />

the same laboratory. The relative st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation<br />

(RSD) <strong>and</strong> assay values obtained by two analysts were<br />

0.36, 99.50 <strong>and</strong> 0.31, 99.60 respectively (Table no.4).<br />

Accuracy (Recovery Test):<br />

Accuracy <strong>of</strong> the method was studied by recovery<br />

experiments. The recovery experiments were performed by<br />

adding known amounts to tablet. The recovery was<br />

performed at three levels, 80,100<strong>and</strong> 120% <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime<br />

axetil st<strong>and</strong>ard concentration. The recovery samples were<br />

prepared in afore mentioned procedure. Three samples were<br />

prepared for each recovery level. The solutions were then<br />

analyzed, <strong>and</strong> the percentage recoveries were calculated<br />

from the calibration curve. The recovery values for<br />

cefuroxime axetil ranged from 99.97 ± 0.3969 (Table no.3).<br />

Linearity:<br />

The linearity <strong>of</strong> the response <strong>of</strong> the drug was verified at 2<br />

to 40 g/ml concentrations,but linearity was found to be<br />

between 4-28 g/ml concentration. The calibration graphs<br />

were obtained by plotting the absorbance versus the<br />

concentration data <strong>and</strong> were treated by linear regression<br />

analysis (Table no.2). The equation <strong>of</strong> the calibration<br />

curve for cefuroxime axetil obtained y = 0.0346x +<br />

0.0566, the calibration curve was found to be linear in the<br />

aforementioned concentrations. The correlation<br />

coefficient (r 2 ) <strong>of</strong> determination was 0.9999.<br />

Limit <strong>of</strong> Detection (LOD) <strong>and</strong> Limit <strong>of</strong> Quantification<br />

(LOQ):<br />

The LOD <strong>and</strong> LOQ <strong>of</strong> Cefuroxime axetil were<br />

determined by using st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> the response<br />

<strong>and</strong> slope approach as defined in International Conference<br />

on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines 7 .The LOD <strong>and</strong> LOQ<br />

was found to be as in table no.2.<br />

223


Asian J. Research Chem. 2(2): April.-June, 2009<br />

,<br />

Table.2 - <strong>Validation</strong> parameters<br />

Sr. No. Parameter Result<br />

1. Absorption maxima(nm) 281<br />

2. Linearity Range (µg/ml) 4-28<br />

3 St<strong>and</strong>ard Regression Equation y = 0.0346x + 0.0566<br />

4 Correlation Coefficient (r2 ) 0.9999<br />

5 Molar absorptivity 49647.9<br />

6 A (1%, 1cm) 398.453<br />

7 Accuracy (% recovery ±SD) 99.97 ± 0.3969<br />

8 Precision 99.50% (Intra-day precision) <strong>and</strong> 99.60%(Inter-day precision)<br />

9 Specificity A 16 µg/ml solution <strong>of</strong> c<strong>and</strong>idate drug in 7.0-pH phosphate buffer at <strong>UV</strong><br />

detection λ <strong>of</strong> 281 nm will show an absorbance value <strong>of</strong> 0.6114 ± 0.035<br />

10 S<strong>and</strong>ell’s Sensitivity<br />

0.02534<br />

(µg/cm 2 /0.001 absorbance unit) 8<br />

11 LOD (µg/ml) 1.3669<br />

12 LOQ (µg/ml) 4.1421<br />

Table No.3 - Determination <strong>of</strong> Accuracy by percentage recovery method<br />

Tablet amount Level <strong>of</strong> Amount Drug<br />

Ingredient (µg/ml) addition (%) added (mg) (µg/ml)<br />

found<br />

% Recovery<br />

cefuroxime 16 80 12.8 28.6918 99.6243<br />

axetil* 16 100 16 31.9672 99.8976<br />

16 120 19.2 35.3430 100.4064<br />

*cefuroxime axetil having br<strong>and</strong> name Kefstar-250<br />

Average %<br />

recovery<br />

99.97 ± 0.3969<br />

Table No.4 - Determination <strong>of</strong> Precision<br />

Sample Assay <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil as % <strong>of</strong> labeled<br />

number<br />

amount<br />

Analyst-I<br />

(Intra-day precision)<br />

1 99.42 99.70<br />

2 99.63 99.23<br />

3 99.58 99.57<br />

4 99.10 99.88<br />

5 100.12 99.98<br />

6 99.20 99.25<br />

Mean 99.50 99.60<br />

RSD 0.36 0.31<br />

Analyst-II<br />

(Inter-day precision)<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> Active Ingredients in Tablets:<br />

The validated method was applied to the determination <strong>of</strong><br />

cefuroxime axetil in Tablets. Six tablets were assayed <strong>and</strong><br />

the results are shown in (Table no. 3) indicating that the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> drug in tablet samples met with requirements<br />

(99–102% <strong>of</strong> the label claim).<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

1. Dollery C. Therapeutic drugs .second edn. Churchill<br />

Livingstone, London UK.1999;C135-C140.<br />

2. Pospisilova B <strong>and</strong> Kubes J. Mercurimetric determination <strong>of</strong><br />

cephalosporin antibiotics. Pharmazie.1998; 43(4):246-248.<br />

3. US Pharmacopoeia (XXIV) <strong>and</strong> National Formulary<br />

(XIX). Asian Edn., US Pharmacopoeial<br />

convection,Inc.Rockville,MD.2000;335.<br />

4. Shaha NJ, Shaha SK, Patel VF, Patel NM. <strong>Development</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> validation <strong>of</strong> HPTLC method for the estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

cefuroxime axetil. Ind J Pharm Sci.2007;69(1):140-142.<br />

5. Murillo JA, Lemus JM, Garcia LF. Specctr<strong>of</strong>lurometric<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil in pharmaceutical dosage<br />

form. J Pharm Biomed Analysis.1994;12(7):875-881.<br />

6. Chaudari SV, Karnik A, Adhikary A, T<strong>and</strong>ale RS, Vavia<br />

PR. Simultanious <strong>UV</strong> spectrophotometric method for<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil <strong>and</strong> probenecid from solid<br />

dosage form. Ind J Pharm Sci.2006;68(1):59-63<br />

7. <strong>Validation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Analytical Procedures, <strong>Method</strong>oly, ICH<br />

Harmonised tripartite guidelines; 1996:1.<br />

8. Khopkar SM, Basic concepts <strong>of</strong> analytical chemistry. New<br />

age international publisher. 2008; 3 rd ed: 277-278.<br />

CONCLUSIONS:<br />

The developed method was found to be simple, sensitive,<br />

accurate, precise, reproducible, <strong>and</strong> can be used for<br />

routine quality control analysis <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil in<br />

bulk <strong>and</strong> pharmaceutical formulation<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:<br />

We are thankful to Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.. Hyderabad<br />

for providing the gift sample <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil.We<br />

would also like to thank Dr.Subhash Devhde Patil<br />

Director Yash Institute <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy for providing all the<br />

facilities to complete our work successfully.<br />

224

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!