02.02.2015 Views

Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method of ...

Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method of ...

Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table No.1 - Calibration Curve parameter.<br />

S. No. Concentration<br />

( µg/ml)<br />

Absorbance ±<br />

SD<br />

1 4 0.1965 ± 0.03 1.7<br />

2 8 0.3349 ± 0.037 1.1<br />

3 12 0.4708 ± 0.037 1.7<br />

4 16 0.6114 ± 0.035 1.5<br />

5 20 0.745 ± 0.023 1.3<br />

6 24 0.889 ± 0.057 2.6<br />

7 28 1.0288 ± 0.037 3.6<br />

Asian J. Research Chem. 2(2): April.-June, 2009<br />

,<br />

%Relative<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

deviation<br />

Figure No.1 - Chemical structure <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil 1 .<br />

Figure No.2 - Determination <strong>of</strong> max <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil<br />

by <strong>UV</strong> scanning.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard stock solution:<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard drug solution <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil was prepared<br />

by dissolving 10mg cefuroxime axetil in 20ml methanol<br />

<strong>and</strong> transfered it to 100ml volumetric flask <strong>and</strong> volume<br />

was made upto mark with phosphate buffer pH 7.0 to<br />

obtain stock solution <strong>of</strong> 100µg/ml concentration. For<br />

obtaining clear solution, solution was ultrasonicated.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> calibration curve:<br />

Calibration curve was prepared in 2:8 (methanol: 7.0 pH<br />

phosphate buffer) at max 281 nm using Perkin Elmer <strong>UV</strong>visible<br />

spectrophotometer. For this stock solution <strong>of</strong> 100<br />

µg/ml was prepared. Serial dilution <strong>of</strong> 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24<br />

<strong>and</strong> 28 µg/ml were prepared <strong>and</strong> absorbance was taken at<br />

max 281 nm. Averages <strong>of</strong> such 8 sets <strong>of</strong> values were<br />

taken for st<strong>and</strong>ard calibration curve, <strong>and</strong> solutions were<br />

scanned in the range <strong>of</strong> 200-400 nm against blank. The<br />

calibration curve was plotted. The optical characteristics<br />

are summarized in Table no.1<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> sample solution:<br />

Ten tablets were weighed <strong>and</strong> powdered. The amount <strong>of</strong><br />

tablet powder equivalent to 10 mg <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil<br />

was weighed accurately <strong>and</strong> transfer to 20 ml methanol<br />

<strong>and</strong> kept for 15 min with frequent shaking <strong>and</strong> volume<br />

was made up to 100 ml mark with phosphate buffer pH<br />

7.0.The solution was then filtered through whatmann<br />

filter paper # 41. This filtrate was diluted suitably with<br />

solvent (20% v/v methanol in phosphate buffer pH 7.0) to<br />

get the solution <strong>of</strong> 16µg/ml concentration .The<br />

absorbance was measured against blank. The drug content<br />

<strong>of</strong> the preparation was calculated using st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

calibration curve. Amount <strong>of</strong> drug estimated by this<br />

method is given in Table no.3<br />

RESULT AND DISCUSSION:<br />

Precision:<br />

Assay <strong>of</strong> method precision (intra-day precision) was<br />

evaluated by carrying out three independent assays <strong>of</strong> test<br />

samples <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime axetil. The intermediate precision<br />

(inter-day precision) <strong>of</strong> the method was also evaluated<br />

using two different analysts, systems <strong>and</strong> different days in<br />

the same laboratory. The relative st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation<br />

(RSD) <strong>and</strong> assay values obtained by two analysts were<br />

0.36, 99.50 <strong>and</strong> 0.31, 99.60 respectively (Table no.4).<br />

Accuracy (Recovery Test):<br />

Accuracy <strong>of</strong> the method was studied by recovery<br />

experiments. The recovery experiments were performed by<br />

adding known amounts to tablet. The recovery was<br />

performed at three levels, 80,100<strong>and</strong> 120% <strong>of</strong> cefuroxime<br />

axetil st<strong>and</strong>ard concentration. The recovery samples were<br />

prepared in afore mentioned procedure. Three samples were<br />

prepared for each recovery level. The solutions were then<br />

analyzed, <strong>and</strong> the percentage recoveries were calculated<br />

from the calibration curve. The recovery values for<br />

cefuroxime axetil ranged from 99.97 ± 0.3969 (Table no.3).<br />

Linearity:<br />

The linearity <strong>of</strong> the response <strong>of</strong> the drug was verified at 2<br />

to 40 g/ml concentrations,but linearity was found to be<br />

between 4-28 g/ml concentration. The calibration graphs<br />

were obtained by plotting the absorbance versus the<br />

concentration data <strong>and</strong> were treated by linear regression<br />

analysis (Table no.2). The equation <strong>of</strong> the calibration<br />

curve for cefuroxime axetil obtained y = 0.0346x +<br />

0.0566, the calibration curve was found to be linear in the<br />

aforementioned concentrations. The correlation<br />

coefficient (r 2 ) <strong>of</strong> determination was 0.9999.<br />

Limit <strong>of</strong> Detection (LOD) <strong>and</strong> Limit <strong>of</strong> Quantification<br />

(LOQ):<br />

The LOD <strong>and</strong> LOQ <strong>of</strong> Cefuroxime axetil were<br />

determined by using st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> the response<br />

<strong>and</strong> slope approach as defined in International Conference<br />

on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines 7 .The LOD <strong>and</strong> LOQ<br />

was found to be as in table no.2.<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!