North American Heavy Oil, Oil Sands, and Oil Shale Resources

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 6-20 (continued). Petroleum refineries in states most likely to produce heavy oil, oil sands and oil shale. Alaska BP Exploration Alaska Inc ConocoPhillips Alaska Inc Flint Hills Resources Alaska LLC Petro Star Inc Petro Star Inc Tesoro Petroleum Corp California Big West Oil of California BP West Coast Products LLC Chevron USA Inc Chevron USA Inc ConocoPhillips Company ConocoPhillips Company ConocoPhillips Company Edgington Oil Co Inc Exxon Mobile Refining & Supply Co Greka Energy Kern Oil & Refining Co Lunday Thagard Co Paramount Petroleum Corp San Joaquin Refining Co Inc Shell Oil Products US Shell Oil Products US Tenby Inc Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co Ultramar Inc Valero Refining California Valero Refining California Colorado Suncor Energy (USA) Inc Suncor Energy (USA) Inc Utah Big West Oil Co Chevron USA Inc Holly Corp Refining & Marketing Silver Eagle Refining Tesoro West Coast Prudhoe Bay Kuparuk North Pole North Pole Valdez Kenai Bakersfield Los Angeles El Segundo Richmond Arroyo Grande Rodeo Wilmington Long Beach Torrance Santa Maria Bakersfield South Gate Paramount Bakersfield Martinez Wilmington Oxnard Martinez Wilmington Benicia Wilmington Commerce City Denver North Salt Lake Salt Lake City Woods Cross Woods Cross Salt Lake City Catalytic Reforming Fuels Low Pressure 13,000 0 0 0 0 0 13,000 216,600 16,300 10,000 49,000 71,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31,000 0 0 22,000 17,000 0 0 20,500 10,500 10,000 Source: Energy Information Administration, Refinery Capacity, 2006 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Pressure Solvent Deasphalting Utah Heavy Oil Program Unconventional Oils Research Report September 2007 Economic and Social 6.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 233,750 0 42,000 0 0 0 32,000 36,750 0 20,000 0 3,300 0 8,500 0 0 34,000 0 20,000 0 37,200 0 0 0 0 37,800 7,300 8,000 7,700 2,200 126,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66,000 0 0 0 66,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,040 0 0 5,040 0 0
6.6 References [1] Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Outlook 2007; DOE/EIA- 0383(2007); U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, D.C., February 2007. Also available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/index.html. [2] Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2007; DOE/EIA- 0484(2006); U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, D.C., May 2007. Also available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/index.html. [3] Mirtis, G. Special Report EOR/Heavy Oil Survey. Oil & Gas Journal April 17, 2006, pp 37-57. [4] Sarathi, P.S.; Olsen, D.K. Practical Aspects of Steam Injection Processes: A Handbook for Independent Operators; NIPER-580(DE92001070); National Institute for Petroleum and Energy Research: Bartlesville, OK, October 1992. [5] Pemex. Pemex Statistical Yearbook 2006; Pemex, 2007. Also available at http://pemex. com/index.cfm?action=content&sectionID=11&catID=149&subcatID=2576. [6] Energy Information Administration. Mexico Country Analysis Brief Oil. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/Mexico/Oil.html (accessed May 9, 2007). [7] Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. Statistical Handbook for Canada’s Upstream Petroleum Industry; 2006-9999; Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, Sept. 2007. Also available at http://capp.ca/default.asp?V_DOC_ID=1071. [8] Energy Information Adminstration. Domestic Crude Oil First Purchase Prices by Crude Stream. http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_top.asp (accessed May 9, 2007). [9] Berry Petroleum. 2005 Form 10-K. http://www.bry.com/index.php?page=investor (accessed January 20, 2007). [10] Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. 2006 Form 10-K. http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/ companyserach.html (accessed May 17, 2007). [11] Berry Petroleum. 2006 Form 10-K. http://www.bry.com/index.php?page=investor (accessed May 17, 2007). [12] California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources. 2000 Annual Report of the State Oil & Gas Supervisor; California Department of Conservation: Sacramento, California, 2001. Also available at http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dog/ pubs_stats/annual_reports/annual_reports_htm. [13] California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources. 2001 Annual Report of the State Oil & Gas Supervisor; California Department of Conservation: Sacramento, California, 2002. Also available at http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dog/ pubs_stats/annual_reports/annual_reports_htm. [14] California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources. 2002 Annual Report of the State Oil & Gas Supervisor; California Department of Conservation: Sacramento, California, 2003. Also available at http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dog/ pubs_stats/annual_reports/annual_reports_htm. [15] California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources. 2003 Annual Report of the State Oil & Gas Supervisor; California Department of Conservation: Sacramento, California, 2004. Also available at http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dog/ pubs_stats/annual_reports/annual_reports_htm. [16] California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources. 2004 Annual Report of the State Oil & Gas Supervisor; California Department of Conservation: Sacramento, California, 2005. Also available at http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dog/ pubs_stats/annual_reports/annual_reports_htm. [17] California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources. 2005 Annual Report of the State Oil & Gas Supervisor; California Department of Conservation: Sacramento, California, 2006. Also available at http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dog/ pubs_stats/annual_reports/annual_reports_htm. [18] Plains Exploration and Production Company. 2006 Form 10-K. http://www.sec. gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html. [19] Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Review 2006; DOE/EIA- 0384(2006); U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, D.C., June 2007. Also Utah Heavy Oil Program Unconventional Oils Research Report September 2007 Economic and Social 6.38
Page 1 and 2:
A T e c h n i c A l , e c o n o m i
Page 3 and 4:
A Technical, Economic, and Legal As
Page 5 and 6:
Forward The Energy Policy Act of 20
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents List of Figures .
Page 9 and 10:
6 Economic and Social Issues Relate
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 4-9. Schematic of the THAI P
Page 13 and 14:
List of Acronyms ACEC Areas of Crit
Page 15 and 16:
TESS Threatened and Endangered Spec
Page 17 and 18:
Executive Summary Against the backd
Page 19 and 20:
Current unconventional fuel product
Page 21 and 22:
higher temperatures with the highes
Page 23 and 24:
trades at a discount to West Texas
Page 25 and 26:
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is
Page 27 and 28:
[14] Buschkuehle, B.E.; Grobe, M. G
Page 29 and 30:
available at http://www.neb-one.gc.
Page 31 and 32:
1 Introduction Due to the current p
Page 33 and 34:
miles or 7 kilometers) and at tempe
Page 35 and 36:
deposits in western Canada containi
Page 37 and 38:
In contrast to oil sands, enourmous
Page 39 and 40:
1.12 References [1] Population Refe
Page 41 and 42:
[37] Natural Gas Division of Natura
Page 43 and 44:
Utah Heavy Oil Program ArcIMS® Map
Page 45 and 46:
2.2 Toolbar Description Currently,
Page 47 and 48:
The table of contents also contains
Page 49 and 50:
It is possible that more than one f
Page 51 and 52:
To use the Query UHOP Repository to
Page 53 and 54:
3 The North American Unconventional
Page 55 and 56:
3.1 Heavy Oil Resource North Americ
Page 57 and 58:
Table 3-1. U.S. Heavy Oil Database
Page 59 and 60:
(EOR), California is the largest pr
Page 61 and 62:
Table 3-2. Table of the remaining p
Page 63 and 64:
Figure 3-10. Map of the areas (Acti
Page 65 and 66:
Figure 3-12. Age of oil sands depos
Page 67 and 68:
arrels considered speculative. The
Page 69 and 70:
Oil sand deposits are also present
Page 71 and 72:
Table 3-7. Characterization of Nort
Page 73 and 74:
Of the other U.S. oil shales, Devon
Page 75 and 76:
University Press: London, 1938; pp
Page 77 and 78:
Production/Processing Technologies
Page 79 and 80:
Surface extraction and processing t
Page 81 and 82:
Modern commercial steamfloods began
Page 83 and 84:
production data from a number of he
Page 85 and 86:
with downhole separation technology
Page 87 and 88:
even though the recovery varied sig
Page 89 and 90:
Table 4-1. Typical physical and che
Page 91 and 92:
4.2.2.1 Surface Mining The Canadian
Page 93 and 94:
Figure 4-6. Bitumen liberation and
Page 95 and 96:
Table 4-4. Properties of bitumen-de
Page 97 and 98:
Figure 4-7. Schematic of a cyclic s
Page 99 and 100:
itumen [74]. Nevertheless, as the C
Page 101 and 102:
Despite the technical progress that
Page 103 and 104:
Table 4-6. Average chemical and ele
Page 105 and 106:
Large scale processing of mined oil
Page 107 and 108:
kiln retort combines direct and ind
Page 109 and 110:
water mixture. The freeze wall esta
Page 111 and 112:
nature of the resource and the resp
Page 113 and 114:
Conference and Exhibition, April 20
Page 115 and 116:
[67] Cha, S.M. Pyrolysis of Oil San
Page 117 and 118:
Utah Heavy Oil Program Unconvention
Page 119 and 120:
5 Upgrading and Refining While ligh
Page 121 and 122:
Research is driven by the need to r
Page 123 and 124: Table 5-1. Available upgrading proc
Page 125 and 126: Table 5-3. Comparison of yield and
Page 127 and 128: A schematic of a fluid coker is sho
Page 129 and 130: Because it produces negligible crac
Page 131 and 132: 5.6 Enhanced Upgrading There is an
Page 133 and 134: 5.6.3 Novel Hydrovisbreaking and Fa
Page 135 and 136: Oil & Gas Journal 2004, 102(30), pp
Page 137 and 138: Economic and Social Issues Related
Page 139 and 140: low-sulfur crude oil is forecast to
Page 141 and 142: Figure 6-2. Price of WTI and less t
Page 143 and 144: Past variations in the prices of bo
Page 145 and 146: However, in recent years the cost o
Page 147 and 148: were 50 to 60 plants in the United
Page 149 and 150: increased production from heavy oil
Page 151 and 152: As seen in Table 6-5, the Rocky Mou
Page 153 and 154: Wyoming. In general, the Chevron Pi
Page 155 and 156: Table 6-7. Annual average wages in
Page 157 and 158: Figure 6-8. Southern California are
Page 159 and 160: as a whole as seen in Table 6-10 [4
Page 161 and 162: Table 6-13. Recent oil and gas prod
Page 163 and 164: density of the seven-county area wa
Page 165 and 166: esources will not cause significant
Page 167 and 168: Production of both crude oil and na
Page 169 and 170: Advances in economic modeling in th
Page 171 and 172: Table 6-20 (continued). Petroleum r
Page 173: Table 6-20 (continued). Petroleum r
Page 177 and 178: [39] IOGCC Governor’s Task Force.
Page 179 and 180: 7 Environmental, Legal and Policy I
Page 181 and 182: Unconventional fuel resource develo
Page 183 and 184: Under this legal framework, the BLM
Page 185 and 186: The only environmental conditions i
Page 187 and 188: Figure 7-3. Utah oil sands with see
Page 189 and 190: action in question, and the “cumu
Page 191 and 192: incentives for cleaner, more sustai
Page 193 and 194: life, historic, cultural, or other
Page 195 and 196: Figure 7-5. Green River Formation o
Page 197 and 198: permitting requests must be evaluat
Page 199 and 200: esponsibilities include preparation
Page 201 and 202: the action clearly outweigh the ben
Page 203 and 204: 7.6.1 Clean Water Act The CWA [118]
Page 205 and 206: a realistic average water flow esti
Page 207 and 208: [21] See Combined Hydrocarbon Leasi
Page 209 and 210: [80] Executive Order 13242, dated M
Page 211: Utah Heavy Oil Program Institute fo
show all

North American Heavy Oil, Oil Sands, and Oil Shale Resources

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?