20.01.2015 Views

ENVIRONMENTAL - International Erosion Control Association

ENVIRONMENTAL - International Erosion Control Association

ENVIRONMENTAL - International Erosion Control Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(RECP); or left untreated (bare slopes<br />

were allowed to vegetate naturally).<br />

The sediment losses from the side<br />

slope portion of the project were measured<br />

over all eight years of the project.<br />

The input fi les for the WEPP model included<br />

slope, climate, soil, and management<br />

for each treatment on both types<br />

of slopes.<br />

Sediment losses the fi rst year after<br />

establishment of both the native and<br />

exotic vegetation represented from 60<br />

to 90 percent of the total losses from<br />

the cut and the fi ll slopes over the eight<br />

years. On cut slopes, 81 percent of total<br />

sediment losses occurred during the<br />

fi rst year of stand establishment. By<br />

contrast, just 38 percent of total sediment<br />

loss from fi ll slopes was observed<br />

during the fi rst year.<br />

These results reflect different soil<br />

conditions between the two types of<br />

slopes, Grace explains. Because they<br />

represent a mixture of topsoil and subsurface<br />

soil, fi ll slopes tend to have a<br />

looser texture. This improves infi ltration<br />

of water, reducing runoff volume,<br />

and makes it easier for vegetation to<br />

establish compared to cut slopes, where<br />

most, if not all, of the looser texture<br />

topsoil has been removed.<br />

“In this study, the fi ll slopes exhibited<br />

100 percent cover of vegetation after<br />

two years,” he says. “It took more than<br />

a year longer to achieve a 90 percent to<br />

100 percent vegetative cover on the cut<br />

slopes.”<br />

Sediment losses from the control<br />

plots on both the cut and the fi ll slopes<br />

continued at a high rate until the fourth<br />

year after disturbance.<br />

Differences in Efficiency<br />

WEPP predictions of sediment<br />

losses over the eight years for the native<br />

and RECP treatments agreed with the<br />

actual measured losses on both cut and<br />

fi ll slopes, Grace reports.<br />

“The model was most efficient in predicting<br />

soil loss from the native treatment<br />

on both types of slopes and it was<br />

high for the RECP treatments on the<br />

cut and fi ll slopes, too,” he says. “It was<br />

least efficient in predicting sediment<br />

losses from the cut and the fi ll slopes<br />

with both the exotic treatment and the<br />

control,” he says. “This reflects the inability<br />

to characterize the vegetation<br />

mixture in the WEPP management fi le<br />

for the erosion control treatments.<br />

“It’s also significant that the native<br />

vegetation was as effective as the exotic<br />

in controlling erosion of the side slopes<br />

over the eight-year period,” Grace adds.<br />

“For the fi rst two years, sediment losses<br />

from the RECP were less than the other<br />

treatments. However, as time went on,<br />

sediment losses from vegetation treatments<br />

decreased and there was no statistical<br />

difference between them.”<br />

Road Surface Results<br />

The crowned unsurfaced roads<br />

consisted of native sandy loam soil<br />

overlaying a clay loam subsoil. The<br />

Figures 1 – 3 show equipment used to measure runoff from the road section part of the research in the Chattahoochee National Forest in Georgia, USA.<br />

Figure 1: The white trapezoidal flume on the<br />

ground includes a submerged pressure transducer<br />

that measures the depth of runoff from a<br />

section of the forest road. This information is<br />

used to calculate the flow rate. Photo Credit:<br />

Johnny M. Grace, III.<br />

Figure 2: The white pole-mounted box is the<br />

instrumentation hut. It contains a stormwater<br />

sampler, a flow meter and batteries to operate<br />

these instruments. A computer is connected<br />

to these devices to download the information<br />

they’ve collected. Photo Credit: Johnny M.<br />

Grace, III.<br />

Figure 3: Engineering technician Preston<br />

Steele, Jr., measures water collected in a manual<br />

rain gauge. Electronic rain gauges also<br />

were used to measure rainfall. Photo Credit:<br />

Johnny M. Grace, III.<br />

OCTOBER 2007 • 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!