21.01.2015 Views

edition - HP Computer Museum

edition - HP Computer Museum

edition - HP Computer Museum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>HP</strong> 3000 Series<br />

For more information on this topic,<br />

the DSNIMTS Reference Manual<br />

(32193-90002), 2608s Reference Manual<br />

(02608-90915) and the 2333A<br />

Reference Manual (02333-90001)<br />

should be of assistance.<br />

Multipoint<br />

Performance Vs.<br />

Point-to-Point<br />

Performance<br />

Multipoint is different than pointto-point<br />

connections. The two<br />

major variables that differentiate<br />

the two solutions are:<br />

Cabling configurations<br />

Performance considerations<br />

By definition, point-to-point is one<br />

terminal connected to one computer<br />

port. This is a straightforward<br />

way of sending data. Direct<br />

transmission between the terminal<br />

and computer takes place without<br />

using any intermediate protocol.<br />

As data is entered into the terminal<br />

and the return key pressed, data is<br />

sent to the computer.<br />

Multipoint is defined as multiple<br />

device connections to a single line.<br />

Communication becomes a little<br />

more complex. Because multiple<br />

devices are connected to one line,<br />

a certain amount of bandwidth<br />

must be devoted to controlling access<br />

to the line by the various devices.<br />

This portion of the bandwidth<br />

is not available for transmitting<br />

data and constitutes multipoint<br />

overhead. This overhead utilizes<br />

approximately 33% of the<br />

multipoint line. This means that<br />

66% of the multipoint line can be<br />

used for data transmission. In<br />

order to successfully predict the<br />

performance of devices on a multipoint<br />

line, it is necessary to compute<br />

the amount of data that is expected<br />

to be transferred to and<br />

from these devices. To do this, line<br />

speed and expected data transmission<br />

for the line are the two<br />

variables necessary. For specific<br />

details, refer to the DSNIMTS Sales<br />

Training Manual.<br />

1 6 January 1983<br />

<strong>Computer</strong> News OEM Edt~on<br />

The fact that point-to-point and<br />

multipoint protocols differ does<br />

not mean that user response times<br />

in both situations differ. Provided<br />

the multipoint configuration does<br />

not exceed the line saturation,<br />

multipoint users will see response<br />

times similar to the point-to-point<br />

users.<br />

DSNIData Link and Remote Daisy<br />

Chain are multipoint configurations<br />

must commonly seen today.<br />

With the advent of multipoint enhancements<br />

to include <strong>HP</strong> 2608s<br />

and <strong>HP</strong> 2333A support, new configurations<br />

will be arising and the<br />

question of performance (i.e., user<br />

response time) rears its head once<br />

more. Since both products are connected<br />

to a multipoint line, the<br />

same variables (amount of data and<br />

line speed) exist when determining<br />

line utilization and subsequent<br />

performance.<br />

<strong>HP</strong> 2333A and Multipoint - What<br />

Kind of Performance Can Be<br />

Expected<br />

The 2333A Multipoint Cluster<br />

Controller provides the user with<br />

a point-to-point operation in a<br />

multipoint environment. This is a<br />

key statement. Even though the<br />

2333A allows a Term Type 10 terminal<br />

to be attached to a multipoint<br />

environment, to run either character<br />

or block mode, and be totally<br />

transparent to the user, it still uses<br />

multipoint protocol. For this<br />

reason, performance (response<br />

time) depends upon the configuration<br />

of devices, the polling sequence,<br />

the amount of data being<br />

transferred and the speed of the<br />

line. Provided data transmitted at<br />

any one time does not exceed the<br />

maximum multipoint line saturation,<br />

the user response will be that<br />

of a point-to-point configuration.<br />

The only time there may be some<br />

response time degradation is when<br />

the system processor is doing extensive<br />

110 tasks (e.g. LISTF, SYS<br />

DUMP, TDP, SLATE, etc.). When<br />

this happens, the system processor<br />

is slower to read the data from the<br />

multipoint line; subsequently, af-<br />

fecting the multipoint user's response<br />

time. Keep in mind that this<br />

is true if the user is connected directly<br />

to a multipoint line or to a<br />

2333A Multipoint Cluster<br />

Controller.<br />

The conclusion is: When configuring<br />

the 2333A into a multipoint environment,<br />

all the multipoint variables<br />

that affect performance must<br />

be considered.<br />

<strong>HP</strong> 2608s and Multipoint - What<br />

Kind of Performance Can Be<br />

Expected<br />

The <strong>HP</strong> 2608s connected via <strong>HP</strong>-IB<br />

runs optimally at 400 lpm using all<br />

upper and lower case characters.<br />

When connecting to a multipoint<br />

line, the 2608s throughput (lpm) is<br />

identical provided it is configured<br />

properly. This means that line<br />

speed, number of characters per<br />

printed line and number of<br />

connected devices are what<br />

determine printer throughput.<br />

To show how line speed affects<br />

printer throughput (lpm), the<br />

following test was performed. The<br />

2608s was the only device<br />

connected to a DSNIData Link. The<br />

amount of data transmitted was<br />

constant (i.e., 132 upper case<br />

character length lines for 10<br />

minutes). The baud rates tested<br />

were 4800,9600, and 19,200 bps.<br />

The results: As baud rate<br />

increased, so too did the printer<br />

throughput.<br />

The results differ when more<br />

devices are configured on the line.<br />

When this occurs, a priority<br />

scheme is introduced. Tests were<br />

performed where the 2608s was<br />

configured with three other<br />

terminals. This was a Daisy Chain<br />

configuration running at 9600 bps.<br />

The printer was configured as High<br />

(I), Normal (5) and Low (9)<br />

priorities while the terminals were<br />

configured at priority 5.<br />

The results: When there are<br />

multiple devices on the line, the<br />

higher assigned priority for the<br />

2608S, the greater the Line Printer<br />

throughput (lpm).<br />

Pp3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!