Insurance Company Rating - Credit Rating Agency of Bangladesh
Insurance Company Rating - Credit Rating Agency of Bangladesh
Insurance Company Rating - Credit Rating Agency of Bangladesh
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Company</strong> <strong>Rating</strong><br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
In light <strong>of</strong> the prevailing dynamics <strong>of</strong> the insurance sector in <strong>Bangladesh</strong>, CRAB has<br />
developed a methodology to rate the strength <strong>of</strong> insurance companies to meet its future<br />
obligations. The independent and pr<strong>of</strong>essional approach <strong>of</strong> CRAB is designed to ensure<br />
reliable, consistent and unbiased opinions. <strong>Credit</strong> rating <strong>of</strong> an <strong>Insurance</strong> company is not<br />
specific to any particular insurance policy or contract because the standing <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />
obligation would depend on an assessment <strong>of</strong> its relative standing under the laws<br />
governing the obligation and the insurance company.<br />
RATING METHODOLOGY<br />
The analytical framework for <strong>Insurance</strong> companies utilizes a format that divides the<br />
analysis into several modules, ensuring that all salient issues are considered. The<br />
parameters for analysis include:<br />
I. INDUSTRY ANALYSIS<br />
A. Competitive Structure<br />
• The degree <strong>of</strong> concentration within the industry.<br />
• The extent to which the concentration is expected to remain orderly.<br />
• The degree <strong>of</strong> national protectionism.<br />
B. Regulatory Trends<br />
II. COMPANY ANALYSIS<br />
A. Organizational Structure<br />
• Review <strong>of</strong> the legal structure with emphasis on holding company and all<br />
subsidiaries and affiliates.<br />
• Relationship within group companies with respect to reinsurance.<br />
• Agreements, formal support agreements, management contracts, tax-sharing<br />
agreements and marketing agreements.<br />
B. Business Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
• Pr<strong>of</strong>itability trend in the company's major business segments and products over 5<br />
years.<br />
• Stability and predictability <strong>of</strong> cash flows from principal business lines.<br />
C. Investment Portfolio Risks<br />
• Assessment <strong>of</strong> the investment goals <strong>of</strong> the company<br />
• Assessment <strong>of</strong> the constraints within which the investments have to be made.<br />
• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the asset quality <strong>of</strong> the investments and their liquidity characteristics.<br />
• Risk pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the portfolio.<br />
1
D. Financial strength<br />
Evaluation to gauge potential volatility in earnings and to evaluate the protective<br />
factors and adequacy <strong>of</strong> control procedures to manage volatility. This would include<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong>:<br />
• Pricing and underwriting<br />
• Asset / liability management<br />
• Hedging activities<br />
• Foreign exchange exposure<br />
• Reinsurance exposure<br />
E. Assessment <strong>of</strong> the financial policies <strong>of</strong> the company<br />
F. Management Quality<br />
G. Systems and procedures<br />
RATING PROCESS<br />
The rating exercise begins with the company issuing a mandate to CRAB, along with the<br />
basic business and financial information. A team <strong>of</strong> analysts takes up the work <strong>of</strong> collection<br />
<strong>of</strong> data and information from the books and records <strong>of</strong> the concern and interacts with its<br />
executives. The team also relies on the in-house research and database <strong>of</strong> CRAB and other<br />
data sources considered reliable by the analysts. Factors that may have an impact on the<br />
claims paying ability <strong>of</strong> the company are discussed with the management. The rating team<br />
makes a presentation to the <strong>Rating</strong> Committee, covering the whole gamut <strong>of</strong> issues which<br />
could be critical in determining the claims paying ability. The rating assigned is<br />
communicated to the company along with the rationale.<br />
The company has the option to accept or not to accept the rating or request a rating<br />
review. CRAB would review the rating if supported by new facts arising from changes in<br />
the business environment or operating fundamentals. All information obtained from the<br />
insurance company is kept confidential.<br />
2
INSURANCE COMPANIES IPO RATING<br />
RATING<br />
AAA<br />
(Triple A)<br />
AA1<br />
AA2<br />
AA3*<br />
(Double A)<br />
A1<br />
A2<br />
A3<br />
(Single A)<br />
BBB1<br />
BBB2<br />
BBB3<br />
(Triple B)<br />
BB1<br />
BB2<br />
BB3<br />
(Double B)<br />
B1<br />
B2<br />
B3<br />
(Single B)<br />
DEFINITION<br />
Highest Earning Prospect.<br />
<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to be the strongest, characterized by<br />
excellent financials, highest claims paying capability, healthy and sustainable franchises, and a<br />
first rate operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong> earnings over the medium term<br />
are <strong>of</strong> the highest grade and changes in business/economic circumstances, as may be envisaged,<br />
are unlikely to significantly impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />
Very High Earning Prospect.<br />
<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to be very strong, characterized by<br />
very good financials, very high claims paying ability, healthy and sustainable franchises, and a<br />
first rate operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong> earnings over the medium term<br />
are <strong>of</strong> very high grade and changes in business/economic circumstances, as may be envisaged,<br />
may very slightly impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />
High Earning Prospect.<br />
<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to be strong, characterized by good<br />
financials, high claims paying ability, healthy and sustainable franchises, and a first rate<br />
operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong> earnings over the medium term are <strong>of</strong><br />
high grade and changes in business/economic circumstances, as may be envisaged, may slightly<br />
impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />
Above Average Earning Prospect.<br />
<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to be very solid, characterized by<br />
above average financials, adequate claims paying ability, valuable and defensible business<br />
franchises, and an attractive and stable operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong><br />
earnings over the medium term are <strong>of</strong> above average grade and changes in business/economic<br />
circumstances, as may be envisaged, may impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />
Average Earning Prospect.<br />
<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to be solid, characterized by average<br />
financials, moderate claims paying ability, valuable and defensible business franchises, and a<br />
stable operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong> earnings over the medium term<br />
are <strong>of</strong> average grade and changes in business/economic circumstances, as may be envisaged,<br />
may significantly impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />
Below Average Earning Prospect.<br />
<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to be almost solid, characterized by<br />
nearly average financials, below average claims paying ability, valuable and defensible business<br />
franchises, and a stable operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong> earnings over<br />
the medium term are <strong>of</strong> nearly average grade and changes in business/economic circumstances,<br />
as may be envisaged, may greatly impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />
C<br />
Inadequate Earning Prospect.<br />
<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to have weak financial strength and<br />
are limited by one or more <strong>of</strong> the factors as: a vulnerable or developing business franchise; weak<br />
claims paying ability, weak financial fundamentals; or an unstable operating environment. The<br />
level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong> earnings over the medium term are <strong>of</strong> poor grade and changes in<br />
business/economic circumstances, as may be envisaged, may highly impair the underlying<br />
fundamentals.<br />
D Extremely Speculative.<br />
<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category possess very weak intrinsic financial strength,<br />
requiring periodic outside support or suggesting an eventual need for outside assistance. Such<br />
institutions may be limited by one or more <strong>of</strong> the factors as: a business franchise <strong>of</strong> questionable<br />
value; inadequate claims paying ability, financial fundamentals that are seriously deficient in one<br />
or more respects; or a highly unstable operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong><br />
earnings over the medium term are <strong>of</strong> speculative grade and changes in business/economic<br />
circumstances, as may be envisaged, may highly impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />
* 1,2,3 refer to above average, average, and below average status in the group<br />
3