21.01.2015 Views

Insurance Company Rating - Credit Rating Agency of Bangladesh

Insurance Company Rating - Credit Rating Agency of Bangladesh

Insurance Company Rating - Credit Rating Agency of Bangladesh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Company</strong> <strong>Rating</strong><br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In light <strong>of</strong> the prevailing dynamics <strong>of</strong> the insurance sector in <strong>Bangladesh</strong>, CRAB has<br />

developed a methodology to rate the strength <strong>of</strong> insurance companies to meet its future<br />

obligations. The independent and pr<strong>of</strong>essional approach <strong>of</strong> CRAB is designed to ensure<br />

reliable, consistent and unbiased opinions. <strong>Credit</strong> rating <strong>of</strong> an <strong>Insurance</strong> company is not<br />

specific to any particular insurance policy or contract because the standing <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />

obligation would depend on an assessment <strong>of</strong> its relative standing under the laws<br />

governing the obligation and the insurance company.<br />

RATING METHODOLOGY<br />

The analytical framework for <strong>Insurance</strong> companies utilizes a format that divides the<br />

analysis into several modules, ensuring that all salient issues are considered. The<br />

parameters for analysis include:<br />

I. INDUSTRY ANALYSIS<br />

A. Competitive Structure<br />

• The degree <strong>of</strong> concentration within the industry.<br />

• The extent to which the concentration is expected to remain orderly.<br />

• The degree <strong>of</strong> national protectionism.<br />

B. Regulatory Trends<br />

II. COMPANY ANALYSIS<br />

A. Organizational Structure<br />

• Review <strong>of</strong> the legal structure with emphasis on holding company and all<br />

subsidiaries and affiliates.<br />

• Relationship within group companies with respect to reinsurance.<br />

• Agreements, formal support agreements, management contracts, tax-sharing<br />

agreements and marketing agreements.<br />

B. Business Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>itability trend in the company's major business segments and products over 5<br />

years.<br />

• Stability and predictability <strong>of</strong> cash flows from principal business lines.<br />

C. Investment Portfolio Risks<br />

• Assessment <strong>of</strong> the investment goals <strong>of</strong> the company<br />

• Assessment <strong>of</strong> the constraints within which the investments have to be made.<br />

• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the asset quality <strong>of</strong> the investments and their liquidity characteristics.<br />

• Risk pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the portfolio.<br />

1


D. Financial strength<br />

Evaluation to gauge potential volatility in earnings and to evaluate the protective<br />

factors and adequacy <strong>of</strong> control procedures to manage volatility. This would include<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• Pricing and underwriting<br />

• Asset / liability management<br />

• Hedging activities<br />

• Foreign exchange exposure<br />

• Reinsurance exposure<br />

E. Assessment <strong>of</strong> the financial policies <strong>of</strong> the company<br />

F. Management Quality<br />

G. Systems and procedures<br />

RATING PROCESS<br />

The rating exercise begins with the company issuing a mandate to CRAB, along with the<br />

basic business and financial information. A team <strong>of</strong> analysts takes up the work <strong>of</strong> collection<br />

<strong>of</strong> data and information from the books and records <strong>of</strong> the concern and interacts with its<br />

executives. The team also relies on the in-house research and database <strong>of</strong> CRAB and other<br />

data sources considered reliable by the analysts. Factors that may have an impact on the<br />

claims paying ability <strong>of</strong> the company are discussed with the management. The rating team<br />

makes a presentation to the <strong>Rating</strong> Committee, covering the whole gamut <strong>of</strong> issues which<br />

could be critical in determining the claims paying ability. The rating assigned is<br />

communicated to the company along with the rationale.<br />

The company has the option to accept or not to accept the rating or request a rating<br />

review. CRAB would review the rating if supported by new facts arising from changes in<br />

the business environment or operating fundamentals. All information obtained from the<br />

insurance company is kept confidential.<br />

2


INSURANCE COMPANIES IPO RATING<br />

RATING<br />

AAA<br />

(Triple A)<br />

AA1<br />

AA2<br />

AA3*<br />

(Double A)<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

A3<br />

(Single A)<br />

BBB1<br />

BBB2<br />

BBB3<br />

(Triple B)<br />

BB1<br />

BB2<br />

BB3<br />

(Double B)<br />

B1<br />

B2<br />

B3<br />

(Single B)<br />

DEFINITION<br />

Highest Earning Prospect.<br />

<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to be the strongest, characterized by<br />

excellent financials, highest claims paying capability, healthy and sustainable franchises, and a<br />

first rate operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong> earnings over the medium term<br />

are <strong>of</strong> the highest grade and changes in business/economic circumstances, as may be envisaged,<br />

are unlikely to significantly impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />

Very High Earning Prospect.<br />

<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to be very strong, characterized by<br />

very good financials, very high claims paying ability, healthy and sustainable franchises, and a<br />

first rate operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong> earnings over the medium term<br />

are <strong>of</strong> very high grade and changes in business/economic circumstances, as may be envisaged,<br />

may very slightly impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />

High Earning Prospect.<br />

<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to be strong, characterized by good<br />

financials, high claims paying ability, healthy and sustainable franchises, and a first rate<br />

operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong> earnings over the medium term are <strong>of</strong><br />

high grade and changes in business/economic circumstances, as may be envisaged, may slightly<br />

impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />

Above Average Earning Prospect.<br />

<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to be very solid, characterized by<br />

above average financials, adequate claims paying ability, valuable and defensible business<br />

franchises, and an attractive and stable operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong><br />

earnings over the medium term are <strong>of</strong> above average grade and changes in business/economic<br />

circumstances, as may be envisaged, may impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />

Average Earning Prospect.<br />

<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to be solid, characterized by average<br />

financials, moderate claims paying ability, valuable and defensible business franchises, and a<br />

stable operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong> earnings over the medium term<br />

are <strong>of</strong> average grade and changes in business/economic circumstances, as may be envisaged,<br />

may significantly impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />

Below Average Earning Prospect.<br />

<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to be almost solid, characterized by<br />

nearly average financials, below average claims paying ability, valuable and defensible business<br />

franchises, and a stable operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong> earnings over<br />

the medium term are <strong>of</strong> nearly average grade and changes in business/economic circumstances,<br />

as may be envisaged, may greatly impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />

C<br />

Inadequate Earning Prospect.<br />

<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category are adjudged to have weak financial strength and<br />

are limited by one or more <strong>of</strong> the factors as: a vulnerable or developing business franchise; weak<br />

claims paying ability, weak financial fundamentals; or an unstable operating environment. The<br />

level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong> earnings over the medium term are <strong>of</strong> poor grade and changes in<br />

business/economic circumstances, as may be envisaged, may highly impair the underlying<br />

fundamentals.<br />

D Extremely Speculative.<br />

<strong>Insurance</strong> Companies rated in this category possess very weak intrinsic financial strength,<br />

requiring periodic outside support or suggesting an eventual need for outside assistance. Such<br />

institutions may be limited by one or more <strong>of</strong> the factors as: a business franchise <strong>of</strong> questionable<br />

value; inadequate claims paying ability, financial fundamentals that are seriously deficient in one<br />

or more respects; or a highly unstable operating environment. The level, growth and quality <strong>of</strong><br />

earnings over the medium term are <strong>of</strong> speculative grade and changes in business/economic<br />

circumstances, as may be envisaged, may highly impair the underlying fundamentals.<br />

* 1,2,3 refer to above average, average, and below average status in the group<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!