united states district court western district of oklahoma local civil ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$H:\WP8\COURT\NOTICES\10-01 Death Penalty LC Announcement ...$

$H:\WP8\COURT\NOTICES\13-02 Law Clerk Judge Russell revised ...$

$C:\Users\mckee\Desktop\magistrate vacancy notice.wpd$

$H:\DOCUMENT\Federal Bar presentation 4-1-09.wpd$

Analysis of Responses Received From Persons the Committee Identified as Being Experienced Mediation Participants Table 4 Experienced Mediation Participants N=103 Question 2: “Are you in favor of having a local rule that applies to mediations” Number of Participants Percentage* a. Yes 75 72.8% b. No 26 25.2% Question 3: “If you favor a local rule addressing mediation, indicate all areas/topics you feel the provision should address.” Number of Participants (out of 75) Percentage of Experienced Mediation Participants Who Favor Rules** Percentage of All Experienced Mediation Participants* a. Required attendees 67 89.3% 65% b. Required settlement authority 67 89.3% 65% c. Requests to be excused from attendance or settlement authority 59 78.7% 57.3% requirements d. Communication with mediators 51 68% 49.5% e. OTHER topics 17 22.7% 16.5% Question 4: “During the past two years, have you participated in any of the following ADR proceedings” Number of Participants Percentage* a. Early neutral evaluation 12 11.8% b. Court-annexed non-binding arbitration 7 6.9% c. Summary jury trial 7 6.9% d. Summary bench trial 3 2.9% e. Executive mini trial 0 0% f. Special master proceeding 0 0% *Based on the total number of participants in this analysis (n=103). **Those who responded that they favor rules applying to mediation in question 2. 15
Analysis of Responses Received From Persons the Committee Identified as Being Experienced Mediators Table 5 Experienced Mediators N=8 Question 2: “Are you in favor of having a local rule that applies to mediations” Number of Participants Percentage* a. Yes 2 25% b. No 5 62.5% Question 3: “If you favor a local rule addressing mediation, indicate all areas/topics you feel the provision should address.” Number of Participants (out of 8) Percentage of Experienced Mediators Who Favor Rules** Percentage of All Experienced Mediator Participants* a. Required attendees 2 100% 25% b. Required settlement authority 2 100% 25% c. Requests to be excused from attendance 2 100% 25% or settlement authority requirements d. Communication with mediators 2 100% 25% e. OTHER topics 2 100% 25% Question 4: “During the past two years, have you participated in any of the following ADR proceedings” Number of Participants Percentage* a. Early neutral evaluation 0 0% b. Court-annexed non-binding arbitration 0 0% c. Summary jury trial 0 0% d. Summary bench trial 0 0% e. Executive mini trial 0 0% f. Special master proceeding 0 0% *Based on the total number of participants in this analysis (n=8). **Those who responded that they favor rules applying to mediation in question 2. 16
Page 1 and 2: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTER
Page 3 and 4: B. Reason for the Change...........
Page 5 and 6: 3. LCvR 16.1(a)(1) Rule of Civil Pr
Page 7 and 8: 4. LCvR 16.1(b)(2) A. The Proposed
Page 9 and 10: 7. LCvR 16.3 provisions involving s
Page 11 and 12: an amount up to the plaintiff’s p
Page 13 and 14: LOCAL CIVIL RULES SURVEY REPORT JUN
Page 15 and 16: Analysis of Results Received from A
Page 17: Analysis of Responses Received From
Page 21 and 22: # Response 1 2 3 4 8. Early mediati
Page 23 and 24: # Response 1 2 3 4 36. I believe me
Page 25 and 26: 8. LCvR 55.1 A. The Proposed Change
Page 27 and 28: Third, the local rule requires an i
Page 29 and 30: of an individual judge to refer a m
Page 31 and 32: To the extent the parties have made
Page 33 and 34: 5. APPLICABILITY OF FED. R. CIV. P.
Page 35 and 36: Submitted this ______ day of ______
Page 37 and 38: Lastly, as in Paragraph “8(D),”
Page 39 and 40: *The listing of witnesses and exhib
Page 41 and 42: B. Reason for the Change The Commit
Page 43 and 44: 6. EXHIBITS. The following exclusio
Page 45: B. Reason for the Change The Commit

united states district court western district of oklahoma local civil ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?