united states district court western district of oklahoma local civil ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$H:\WP8\COURT\NOTICES\10-01 Death Penalty LC Announcement ...$

$H:\WP8\COURT\NOTICES\13-02 Law Clerk Judge Russell revised ...$

$C:\Users\mckee\Desktop\magistrate vacancy notice.wpd$

$H:\DOCUMENT\Federal Bar presentation 4-1-09.wpd$

amendment would eliminate the potential inconsistency and expressly permit referral to the Oklahoma Bar Association without the need for authorization by the chief district judge. The proposed language resembles the wording used by some other courts with similar procedures involving referral of misconduct issues to the chief district judge or a screening committee. See E.D. Wash. LR 83.3(j) (“This rule does not restrict the judges of this district from referring a matter to any bar association for disciplinary action.”); D. Idaho Civil Rule 83.5(b)(8) (“This rule does not restrict the Court or any judge thereof from referring an attorney or a matter to any other court or to any bar association for investigation and/or disciplinary action.”). 10. Appendix II - Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan [see pages 29-32] A. The Proposed Change The Committee proposes seven changes to the “Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan.” First, the word “State” would be added to the start of “2.” Second, in “3,” the Committee would delete the phrase “or reasonably disputable.” Third, the form would amend “8(D)” by changing the citation from Fed. R. Civ. P. “26(f)(3)” to “26(f)(3)(C).” Fourth, in “8(E),” the citation to Rule 26(f)(3) would be changed to Rule 26(f)(3)(D).” Fifth, in “8(D)” and “8(E),” the Committee would change the language from “as required by” to “pursuant to.” Sixth, in “8(E),” the Committee would add the following language: Rule 8.3(a), Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct (eff. Jan. 1, 2008). 27
To the extent the parties have made any agreements pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3)(D) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 502(e) regarding a procedure to assert claims of privilege/protection after production and are requesting that the court include such agreement in an order, please set forth the agreement in detail below and submit a proposed order adopting the same. Seventh, in “12(B),” the Committee would change “Mediation” to “Court- Ordered Mediation subject to LCvR 16.3.” The new version of the “Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan” appears below at pages 29-32: 28
Page 1 and 2: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTER
Page 3 and 4: B. Reason for the Change...........
Page 5 and 6: 3. LCvR 16.1(a)(1) Rule of Civil Pr
Page 7 and 8: 4. LCvR 16.1(b)(2) A. The Proposed
Page 9 and 10: 7. LCvR 16.3 provisions involving s
Page 11 and 12: an amount up to the plaintiff’s p
Page 13 and 14: LOCAL CIVIL RULES SURVEY REPORT JUN
Page 15 and 16: Analysis of Results Received from A
Page 17 and 18: Analysis of Responses Received From
Page 19 and 20: Analysis of Responses Received From
Page 21 and 22: # Response 1 2 3 4 8. Early mediati
Page 23 and 24: # Response 1 2 3 4 36. I believe me
Page 25 and 26: 8. LCvR 55.1 A. The Proposed Change
Page 27 and 28: Third, the local rule requires an i
Page 29: of an individual judge to refer a m
Page 33 and 34: 5. APPLICABILITY OF FED. R. CIV. P.
Page 35 and 36: Submitted this ______ day of ______
Page 37 and 38: Lastly, as in Paragraph “8(D),”
Page 39 and 40: *The listing of witnesses and exhib
Page 41 and 42: B. Reason for the Change The Commit
Page 43 and 44: 6. EXHIBITS. The following exclusio
Page 45: B. Reason for the Change The Commit

united states district court western district of oklahoma local civil ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?