21.01.2015 Views

united states district court western district of oklahoma local civil ...

united states district court western district of oklahoma local civil ...

united states district court western district of oklahoma local civil ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Certification <strong>of</strong> these discussions must be submitted in conjunction<br />

with the Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan in the form<br />

provided as Appendix II.<br />

The Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan shall include, to the extent<br />

then known, the contentions <strong>of</strong> each party and the issues <strong>of</strong> fact and<br />

law. It shall also contain a list <strong>of</strong> all exhibits, witnesses, and discovery<br />

materials to the extent then known, together with time estimates to<br />

complete discovery and trial. It shall be the duty <strong>of</strong> counsel for the<br />

plaintiff or pro se plaintiff to arrange this joint preparation and the duty<br />

<strong>of</strong> all counsel and pro se parties to jointly participate in and facilitate it.<br />

The information exchanged shall be incorporated into the Joint Status<br />

Report and Discovery Plan. This Joint Status Report and Discovery<br />

Plan will be prepared and signed jointly and filed as a single document<br />

with the Clerk <strong>of</strong> Court not later than seven calendar days prior to the<br />

status and scheduling conference, unless otherwise ordered by the<br />

Court.<br />

B. Reason for the Change<br />

In 2007, the Court eliminated legal issues, witness lists, and exhibit lists in the<br />

joint status report and discovery plan. The proposed amendment would<br />

conform the <strong>local</strong> <strong>civil</strong> rule to the existing form.<br />

The language regarding “issues <strong>of</strong> fact” does not match the language on the<br />

form in Appendix II. Thus, the Committee proposes deletion <strong>of</strong> the phrase,<br />

“issues <strong>of</strong> fact,” in LCvR 16.1(a)(1).<br />

The Committee proposes modification <strong>of</strong> LCvR 16.3 to focus the rule on<br />

mediations. With that change, the Committee suggests moving the discussion<br />

<strong>of</strong> ADR in LCvR 16.3(b) to LCvR 16.1(a)(1). This change requires some<br />

stylistic changes in LCvR 16.1(a)(1). For example, references to the<br />

contentions and time estimates would be deleted from the rule. The<br />

Committee believes this language is unnecessary because the form, Appendix<br />

II, already requires submission <strong>of</strong> contentions and time estimates for the trial.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!