23.01.2015 Views

Estimation of Educational Borrowing Constraints Using Returns to ...

Estimation of Educational Borrowing Constraints Using Returns to ...

Estimation of Educational Borrowing Constraints Using Returns to ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

educational borrowing constraints 133<br />

I. Introduction<br />

Does access <strong>to</strong> credit influence educational outcomes The answer <strong>to</strong><br />

this question is fundamental <strong>to</strong> sensible educational policy and <strong>to</strong> our<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> intergenerational transmission <strong>of</strong> inequality, returns<br />

<strong>to</strong> schooling, economic growth, and many other economic phenomena.<br />

Since a direct answer <strong>to</strong> the question depends on economic variables<br />

difficult or impossible <strong>to</strong> measure, this paper explores alternative approaches<br />

<strong>to</strong> identifying and estimating the influence <strong>of</strong> credit access on<br />

educational choice. The key idea for identification <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> credit<br />

in determining schooling choices is that two types <strong>of</strong> schooling costs,<br />

opportunity costs <strong>of</strong> schooling (the value <strong>of</strong> earnings forgone while in<br />

school) and direct costs <strong>of</strong> schooling (monetary cost <strong>of</strong> tuition, books,<br />

transportation, and board and room if necessary), affect schooling<br />

choices differently for credit-constrained and unconstrained individuals.<br />

Direct costs need financing during periods <strong>of</strong> school enrollment and<br />

present a larger challenge <strong>to</strong> credit-constrained persons. Gross forgone<br />

earnings, by contrast, do not have <strong>to</strong> be financed during school. 1<br />

Empirical implementation <strong>of</strong> our approach requires distinct measures<br />

<strong>of</strong> both direct schooling costs and opportunity costs. Following Card<br />

(1995b), we use as a proxy for direct costs an indica<strong>to</strong>r variable for the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> any college (either a two- or four-year college) in an individual’s<br />

county <strong>of</strong> residence. Opportunity costs are proxied by measures<br />

<strong>of</strong> earnings in low-skill industries located in a person’s local labor market<br />

at the time schooling decisions are made. High prevailing wages in the<br />

local labor market imply high forgone earnings <strong>of</strong> college attendance.<br />

The paper reports empirical findings from four methodologically distinct<br />

econometric approaches <strong>to</strong> estimating the importance <strong>of</strong> credit<br />

access on schooling choice. Each method exploits implied differences<br />

in responses <strong>of</strong> borrowing-disadvantaged students <strong>to</strong> direct costs and<br />

forgone earnings <strong>of</strong> students <strong>to</strong> identify the magnitude <strong>of</strong> credit constraints<br />

on schooling choice.<br />

The first approach begins by following Lang (1993) and Card (1995a)<br />

and estimating returns <strong>to</strong> education using an instrumental variable approach.<br />

2 These authors explain that when the causal effect <strong>of</strong> schooling<br />

on earnings is heterogeneous in the population, instrumental variable<br />

techniques do not recover the population average pay<strong>of</strong>f <strong>to</strong> schooling<br />

but instead estimate the pay<strong>of</strong>f <strong>to</strong> schooling for those marginal individuals<br />

whose schooling choices are most affected by changes in the value<br />

1<br />

Gross forgone earnings are defined as the sum <strong>of</strong> all income earned by a person not<br />

attending school. For expositional simplicity, our s<strong>to</strong>ry abstracts from income students<br />

earn during school enrollment. Those earnings would enter the model as an <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>to</strong><br />

direct college costs, and including them affects none <strong>of</strong> the implications <strong>of</strong> our model.<br />

2<br />

We use the term “returns <strong>to</strong> schooling” <strong>to</strong> denote the coefficient on schooling in a<br />

log wage regression. It is not necessarily the internal rate <strong>of</strong> return.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!