25.01.2015 Views

Sea Turtle Recovery Action Plan for St. Kitts and Nevis - WIDECAST

Sea Turtle Recovery Action Plan for St. Kitts and Nevis - WIDECAST

Sea Turtle Recovery Action Plan for St. Kitts and Nevis - WIDECAST

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CEP Technical Report No. 17<br />

from the Wider Caribbean the tortoiseshell from nearly 12,000 adult hawksbills (Canin, 1989).<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Kitts</strong>/<strong>Nevis</strong> has allegedly participated in this trade in recent years. Japanese import statistics<br />

show that 136 kg of tortoiseshell was received from <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Kitts</strong>/<strong>Nevis</strong> in 1990 (Canin, 1991). The<br />

average yield per hawksbill is 1.34 kg in the Caribbean (Milliken <strong>and</strong> Tokunaga, 1987); thus the<br />

export that year represented a minimum of 100 turtles. Fisheries Division personnel have no<br />

knowledge of any such trade <strong>and</strong> consider it impossible that these turtles were exported from <strong>St</strong>.<br />

<strong>Kitts</strong>/<strong>Nevis</strong>. Since it is highly unlikely that the local population of hawksbills could supply this<br />

amount of shell, the most plausible explanation is that <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Kitts</strong>/<strong>Nevis</strong>, a non-party to CITES<br />

[Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna <strong>and</strong> Flora], was named<br />

as the port of export even though the shell did not actually originate here. This practice is not<br />

uncommon among unscrupulous dealers trying to evade CITES restrictions (Canin, 1991).<br />

Over the past decade, a modest level of export of turtle products has taken place between<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Kitts</strong>/<strong>Nevis</strong> <strong>and</strong> neighbouring isl<strong>and</strong>s. Meylan (1983) described an "active market" in <strong>Nevis</strong>.<br />

In 1980, a buyer in Charlestown was purchasing shell from fishermen around the isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> US$<br />

16/kg <strong>and</strong> reselling it to a dealer from <strong>St</strong>. Lucia. The price in 1983 ranged from US$ 16-24.<br />

Other buyers from Puerto Rico, Dominica, <strong>and</strong> Guadeloupe periodically canvassed the fishermen<br />

at their homes <strong>for</strong> raw shell material. Wilkins <strong>and</strong> Barrett (1987) also noted the "occasional sale"<br />

of shells to buyers from neighbouring isl<strong>and</strong>s. Barrett (1988) reported, "<strong>Turtle</strong>s are slaughtered<br />

<strong>and</strong> sold by fishermen themselves to the public, hoteliers, <strong>and</strong> restaurants on the isl<strong>and</strong>. A total<br />

of 1000 pounds [of meat was] exported to <strong>St</strong>. Barthelemew. The hawksbill shells are sold to<br />

local craftsmen <strong>for</strong> EC$ 30 per pound. . . . Some of the shells were also exported to <strong>St</strong>.<br />

Barthelemew." In October 1991, several sources reported to the NHCS that 1400 lb (636 kg) of<br />

turtle meat had been exported to a buyer in <strong>St</strong>. Barthelemew. It was common knowledge<br />

amongst <strong>Nevis</strong> divers, fishermen, <strong>and</strong> Fisheries personnel interviewed <strong>for</strong> this report that turtle<br />

meat is routinely sold to neighbouring isl<strong>and</strong>s, especially <strong>St</strong>. Barthelemew, but also <strong>St</strong>. Martin<br />

<strong>and</strong> perhaps others. Meat sells in <strong>Nevis</strong> <strong>for</strong> EC$ 3-5/lb, but a fishermen reportedly earn about<br />

US$ 5/lb by selling it through a middleman in <strong>St</strong>. Barthelemew. <strong>Turtle</strong> meat sometimes leaves<br />

the country by air (labeled simply, "meat") <strong>and</strong> other times by boat.<br />

3.4 Inadequate Regulatory Mechanisms<br />

National fisheries legislation was in <strong>for</strong>ce between 1948 <strong>and</strong> 1992 that protected small<br />

sea turtles (under 20 lb, or 9 kg) <strong>and</strong> established a closed season between 1 June-30 September.<br />

For a variety of reasons, this legislation was inadequate to prevent a significant decline in local<br />

sea turtle populations. First, the closed season did not encompass peak nesting periods (1<br />

April-30 November) <strong>and</strong> thus allowed the continued harvest of gravid females. In addition, by<br />

protecting only very young (small) turtles, the most valuable members of the population (i.e., the<br />

large juveniles <strong>and</strong> adults) could be legally taken eight months of the year. We now know that<br />

population stability depends on high rates of survival <strong>for</strong> large juvenile <strong>and</strong> adult turtles that have<br />

already endured the two decades or more needed to reach maturity (or near-maturity). Second,<br />

en<strong>for</strong>cement was nonexistent <strong>and</strong> fishermen often disregarded the regulations (CCA, 1991).<br />

d'Arbeau (1989) described the closed season as "generally ineffective" <strong>and</strong> reported green turtle<br />

meat <strong>for</strong> sale in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Kitts</strong> during the closed season.<br />

Page 22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!