25.01.2015 Views

Sea Turtle Recovery Action Plan for St. Kitts and Nevis - WIDECAST

Sea Turtle Recovery Action Plan for St. Kitts and Nevis - WIDECAST

Sea Turtle Recovery Action Plan for St. Kitts and Nevis - WIDECAST

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CEP Technical Report No. 17<br />

hatchlings from successfully digging out of the nest. If leatherbacks are known to nest on site,<br />

personnel should keep in mind that they begin nesting in April (sometimes March), peak in May,<br />

<strong>and</strong> finish in early July.<br />

It is worth noting that there is an imbalance in the system somewhere when s<strong>and</strong> is lost<br />

from an otherwise predictable beach habitat <strong>and</strong> is not replaced by natural accretion processes.<br />

The underlying cause can be as direct as an up-current solid jetty or pier that is literally<br />

"starving" the down-current beaches by interrupting the constant longshore transport of s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

sediments. Or the impetus may be more subtle, as occurs with the removal of beach vegetation<br />

or when nearshore pollution retards the productivity of calcareous (coralline) algae <strong>and</strong> other<br />

s<strong>and</strong> sources. [N.B. The National Conservation <strong>and</strong> Environment Protection Act, 1987, prohibits<br />

removing or assisting in the removal of "any vegetation from a beach in Saint Christopher <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Nevis</strong> except under the authority of a permit" granted by the Minister.] The linkages between<br />

development <strong>and</strong> the persistence of s<strong>and</strong>y beaches are complex, <strong>and</strong> should be considered with<br />

great care be<strong>for</strong>e construction proximal to s<strong>and</strong>y beaches is permitted. If dunes are leveled,<br />

vegetation removed <strong>and</strong>/or jetties constructed, the likelihood of committing the owners to<br />

repetitive <strong>and</strong> increasingly expensive rebuilding is heightened <strong>and</strong> sometimes guaranteed. This<br />

is not in the long-term interest of the people or sea turtles of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Kitts</strong>/<strong>Nevis</strong>.<br />

Beach rebuilding has not occurred to any significant degree in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Kitts</strong>/<strong>Nevis</strong>, but<br />

authorities should remain vigilant in this regard. Probably the most careless example of manipulation<br />

was the illegal removal of beach s<strong>and</strong> in January 1992 from the primary dune at S<strong>and</strong><br />

Bank Bay <strong>and</strong> the deposit of this s<strong>and</strong> at Cockleshell Bay. The imported s<strong>and</strong> was used to extend<br />

<strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong> the beach at the site of the Casablanca Hotel under construction at Cockleshell Bay.<br />

The Casablanca site had previously been denuded of vegetation <strong>and</strong> coconut palm trees planted.<br />

The palms are not an effective wind break, however, <strong>and</strong> the imported s<strong>and</strong> remained on site <strong>for</strong><br />

only a matter of days be<strong>for</strong>e it was blown away. Such "face-lifting" <strong>for</strong> short-term aesthetic<br />

purposes disrupts coastal ecology, sometimes severely so. The incident was particularly un<strong>for</strong>tunate<br />

because the s<strong>and</strong> was stolen from a known sea turtle nesting area. Banana Bay beach was<br />

also leveled <strong>and</strong> reshaped during the 1992 turtle nesting season by l<strong>and</strong>movers <strong>and</strong> dump trucks.<br />

4.14 Prevent or mitigate degradation of marine habitat<br />

4.141 Dynamiting reefs<br />

The fishermen of <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Kitts</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Nevis</strong> do not use dynamite or other explosives to assist in<br />

the catching of fish. The Fisheries Act of 1984 explicitly <strong>for</strong>bids the use of "any explosive,<br />

poison or other noxious substance <strong>for</strong> the purpose of killing, stunning, disabling or catching fish,<br />

or in any way rendering fish more easily caught". Even the possession or control of any<br />

explosive or other noxious substance in circumstances indicating that same may be used in the<br />

act of catching fish constitutes an offence against the Act. The maximum fine upon summary<br />

conviction is EC$ 1000. It is a recommendation of this <strong>Recovery</strong> <strong>Action</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> that the Act be<br />

fully en<strong>for</strong>ced with regard to explosives.<br />

The use of dynamite to catch or stun fishes or to remove coral reef structure (e.g., to<br />

provide boat access) results in severe <strong>and</strong> possibly permanent damage to the fragile coral. The<br />

Page 44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!