26.01.2015 Views

II II II II II I - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

II II II II II I - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

II II II II II I - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TRI-6L4S-2-O<br />

Figure 2.1.1. Original, deformed, and intermediate configurations <strong>of</strong> a body.<br />

Both W and fZ are antisymmetric and represent a rate <strong>of</strong> rotation (or angular velocity) about some axes. In<br />

general, Q #W. The difference arises when the last term <strong>of</strong> Equation (2.1.5) is not symmetric. The symmetric part<br />

<strong>of</strong> u U-l “K the unrotated deformation rate tensor d as defined below (note that both U and WI are symmetric).<br />

d=#UU-l+U-%)=RTDR . (2. 1.7)<br />

There are two possible cases which can cause rotation <strong>of</strong> a material line element: rigid body rotation and shear.<br />

Because total shear vanishes along the axes <strong>of</strong> principal stretch, the rotation <strong>of</strong> these axes defines the total rigid body<br />

rotation <strong>of</strong> a material point.<br />

It is a simple exercise in vector analysis to show that Equation (2.1.6) represents the rate <strong>of</strong> rigid body rotation<br />

at a material point as shown by Dienes (1979). It is equally simple to show that W represents the rate <strong>of</strong> rotation <strong>of</strong><br />

the principal axes <strong>of</strong> the rate <strong>of</strong> deformation D. Since D and W have no sense <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> deformation, they are<br />

not sufficient to define the rate <strong>of</strong> rotation in a finite deformation context.<br />

Line elements where the rate <strong>of</strong> shear vanishes rotate solely due to rigid body rotations. These line elements are<br />

along the principal axes <strong>of</strong> U. We will apply a similar observation below as we derive Dienes’ (1979) expression<br />

for calculating !2:<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!