II II II II II I - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy
II II II II II I - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy
II II II II II I - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2<br />
11<br />
F=exp–1–~ 6 for q>&; . (4.12.8)<br />
[[<br />
Et<br />
In ~ above equations, A and 8 are referred to as the workhardening and recovexy functions, respectively,<br />
while .at is referred to as the transient strain limit. The workhardening and recovery functions are assumed to be<br />
<strong>of</strong> the form<br />
A=ctw+~wlo —<br />
v<br />
go<br />
(Je<br />
a=ar+pr log: .<br />
()<br />
The trimsient strain limit is a fimction <strong>of</strong> temperature and stress given by<br />
()<br />
m<br />
(4. 12.10)<br />
(4.12. 11)<br />
E: = K. exp(c@) %<br />
P<br />
(4.12.9)<br />
where Ko and c are constants. Finally, the evolution equation for the internal variable g is<br />
~=(F–l)iS=E–6S . (4.12.12)”<br />
To complete the generalization <strong>of</strong> the M-D constitutive model, an equivalent stress and flow rule for the creep<br />
strain rate must be defined. These two definitions provide the necessary linkage among the three-dimensional<br />
stress state, the creep strain rate, and the invariant creep relationships described earlier. According to Munson et<br />
al. (1988), the Tresca stress generalization provides the most appropriate definition <strong>of</strong> the equivalent stress for rock<br />
salt. With the Tresca stress generalization, the equivalent stress becomes<br />
0: = 2&cos~ = tsl –03<br />
(4.12.13)<br />
where~ is the Lode angle defined<br />
by<br />
sin3V =<br />
–3J3 ~<br />
2J;f 2<br />
In the two preceding equations, J2 and J3 are the second and third invariants <strong>of</strong> the deviatoric part <strong>of</strong> the stress<br />
tensor, and 01 and 03 are the maximum and minimum principal stresses, respectively. The flow is assumed to be<br />
associative so that the direction <strong>of</strong> = is normal to the Tresca flow surface. Unfortunately, the normal is undefined<br />
as v = t ~ where sharp comers exist in the Tresca flow surface. At these locations, the flow is assumed to be<br />
normal to the von Mises flow surface. The von Mises flow surface is characterized by a constant value <strong>of</strong> 6P<br />
where<br />
67