26.01.2015 Views

II II II II II I - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

II II II II II I - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

II II II II II I - Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - U.S. Department of Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

~=$s:s . (4.6.9)<br />

J<br />

The yield condition is checked to determine whether ~ < Oyd. If this is the case, the trial stress is the correct<br />

deviatoric stress at the end <strong>of</strong> the time step, Sn+ 1 = S‘r. If yield is exceeded, a simple radial return is performed to<br />

calculate the deviatoric stress at the end <strong>of</strong> the time step<br />

(4.6.10)<br />

Finally, the total stress is determined by<br />

CT”+l =s ‘+1+pn+’ 5 .<br />

(4.6.11)<br />

The Soils and Crushable<br />

Foams model uses four internal state variables:<br />

EVMAX - maximum compressive volumetric strain experienced (always positive),<br />

EVFRAC - current value <strong>of</strong> volumetric fracture strain (positive in compression),<br />

EV - current value <strong>of</strong> volumetric strain (positive in compression),<br />

NUM - integer pointing to the last increment in the pressure function where the interpolate was<br />

found.<br />

The PROP array contains the following entries for this material:<br />

PROP(1)<br />

PROP(2)<br />

PROP(3)<br />

PROP(4)<br />

PROP(5)<br />

PROP(6)<br />

- 2p<br />

- Bulk Modulus, K<br />

-W<br />

- al<br />

- a2<br />

- Function ID number.<br />

4.7 Low Density Foams<br />

The low density foams model presented here was developed by Neilsen, Morgan, and Krieg (1987) and is based<br />

on results from experimental tests on low density, closed-cell polyurethane foams. These foams having densities<br />

ranging from 2 to 10 pounds per cubic foot have been proposed for use as energy absorbers in nuclear waste<br />

shipping containers. Representative responses <strong>of</strong> closed-cell polyurethane foams for various hydrostatic, uniaxial,<br />

and triaxial laboratory test conditions are shown in Figures 4.7.1 and 4.7.2. These results indicate that the ‘<br />

volumetric response <strong>of</strong> the foam is highly dependent on load history. This implies that typical decompositions <strong>of</strong><br />

total foam response into an independent volumetric part and a mean stress (pressure) dependent deviatoric part are<br />

not valid for this class <strong>of</strong> foam. Many “soil and crushable foam” models, including the other foam model described<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!