28.01.2015 Views

Opposition material - City Clerk - City of Jonesboro

Opposition material - City Clerk - City of Jonesboro

Opposition material - City Clerk - City of Jonesboro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Effects <strong>of</strong>Prohibition 15<br />

not affect the ability <strong>of</strong> individuals to become intoxicated and to drive<br />

afterwards.<br />

The only policy variable having a systematic predictive impact on drunk<br />

driving arrests and total crashes is the proportion <strong>of</strong> police in a county. As<br />

can be expected with drunk driving, the more police, the more arrests.<br />

Specifically, for every additional police <strong>of</strong>ficer per 1,000 residents, an additional<br />

1.7 drunk driving arrests are made. On the other hand, the finding that the<br />

more police <strong>of</strong>ficers there are per 1,000 citizens in a county, the more total<br />

alcohol and drug related property damage and total accidents occur, is a bit<br />

counterintuitive. This finding might indicate either a policy decision to deal<br />

with a perceived problem <strong>of</strong> drunk driving by employing more police, or it<br />

may imply that police are discovering more accidents.<br />

Of the geographic and demographic variables, the Delta dummy,<br />

geographic size and median household income significantly affect property<br />

damage and total accidents. Specifically, there is a greater likelihood <strong>of</strong>crashes<br />

outside the Delta, which can be expected due to the Delta's flat terrain and to<br />

the rest <strong>of</strong>the state being either hilly or mountainous. Geographically larger<br />

counties had more property damage crashes, potentially due to the need to<br />

travel greater distances. Median household income has a slight positive<br />

effect on property damage accidents, likely due persons <strong>of</strong> higher income<br />

having more personal property that could potentially be damaged.<br />

Dis~ussioD<br />

Multivariate analysis <strong>of</strong> adult alcohol and adult drug arrest rates shows<br />

that crime control capacity in the fonn <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong>police per J.OOO<br />

residents is statistically significant and is the most powerful detenninant <strong>of</strong><br />

adult alcohol arrest rates. However, the policy variable concerning wet-dampdry<br />

counties, while operating in the expected direction, does not achieve<br />

statistical significance. Therefore, we can conclude that with adult arrest<br />

rate data, Grossman's assertions do not hold.<br />

In addition, based on Grossman's "gateway" hypothesis, both juvenile<br />

drug and alcohol-based arrest rates should be highest in wet counties, then<br />

damp, and finally lowest in dry counties. When analyzed using multivariate<br />

OLS regression, juvenile alcohol and drug arrest rates are higher in dry than<br />

in either damp or wet counties, although the relationships are not statistically<br />

significant.<br />

Univariate analysis <strong>of</strong> differences in drunk driving and accident rates<br />

based on county alcohol policy, with the exception <strong>of</strong>alcohol and drug related

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!