28.01.2015 Views

Admiration and Disgust: The Ambivalent Re-Canonization of the ...

Admiration and Disgust: The Ambivalent Re-Canonization of the ...

Admiration and Disgust: The Ambivalent Re-Canonization of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Ambivalent</strong> <strong>Re</strong>-<strong>Canonization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Zohar in <strong>the</strong> Modern Period<br />

names <strong>of</strong> 'knowledge <strong>and</strong> wisdom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kabbalah', as well as<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir powerful attachment to <strong>the</strong> sanctity <strong>of</strong> Sefer ha-Zohar. 6<br />

<strong>The</strong> classic formula <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Maskilim reflecting <strong>the</strong> negative approach<br />

to Kabbalah, which enjoyed extremely broad influence, was that by<br />

Heinrich Graetz, who referred to <strong>the</strong> Zohar as '<strong>The</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Lies'. He<br />

blamed <strong>the</strong> Zohar that it 'blunted <strong>the</strong> sense for <strong>the</strong> simple <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> true,<br />

<strong>and</strong> created a visionary world, in which <strong>the</strong> souls <strong>of</strong> those who zealously<br />

occupied <strong>the</strong>mselves with it were lulled into a sort <strong>of</strong> half-sleep, <strong>and</strong><br />

lost <strong>the</strong> faculty <strong>of</strong> distinguishing between right <strong>and</strong> wrong'. 7<br />

However, along with this harsh criticism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kabbalah on <strong>the</strong><br />

part <strong>of</strong> 19 th century champions <strong>of</strong> Enlightenment, a number <strong>of</strong> Western<br />

European Jewish thinkers <strong>and</strong> scholars expressed a more sympa<strong>the</strong>tic<br />

approach. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most explicit expressions <strong>of</strong> this view is found in<br />

<strong>the</strong> book by Adolphe Franck, a French Jewish scholar <strong>of</strong> law <strong>and</strong><br />

philosophy, entitled La Kabbale, ou la philophie religieuse des Hébreux<br />

(Paris, 1843; translated into German a year later by Adolph Jellinek). 8<br />

Many chapters <strong>of</strong> this book are devoted to establishing <strong>the</strong> antiquity <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Zohar, to a description <strong>of</strong> its exegetical method <strong>and</strong> an analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

its religious doctrines. Franck (who based himself on a partial Latin<br />

translation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Zohar) argued that <strong>the</strong> Zohar was in fact based upon<br />

<strong>the</strong> teachings <strong>of</strong> Rabbi Simeon bar Yohai, which were initially<br />

transmitted orally <strong>and</strong> subsequently set down in writing, until <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were edited in a final manner in <strong>the</strong> 13 th century. According to Franck,<br />

Sefer ha-Zohar is deserving <strong>of</strong> preservation, primarily because <strong>of</strong> its<br />

historical value. According to him, Sefer ha-Zohar, like Sefer ha-<br />

YeΩirah, is:<br />

6 Y. L. Mises, Qin’at ha-Emet, Vienna 1828, p. 134.<br />

7 H. Graetz, History <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jews, Philadelphia 1897, vol. 14, p. 23.<br />

8 On Franck <strong>and</strong> his book, see Tishby, <strong>The</strong> Wisdom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Zohar, pp. 47-48; P. B.<br />

Fenton, 'La cabbale et l'academie', Pardes 19-20 (1994), pp. 219-222. <strong>The</strong> book<br />

is based upon Franck's 1839 lecture, which was published in article form in 1841<br />

under <strong>the</strong> title 'Sur la Kabbale, lus dans la séance du 17 août 1839', Memoires de<br />

l'Academie des Sciences Morales et Memoires Politiques de l'Institute de France,<br />

I (1841), pp. 195-348. Cf. Fenton, ibid., p. 236 n. 11. Fur<strong>the</strong>r editions <strong>of</strong> 'La<br />

Kabbale' were published in 1889 <strong>and</strong> 1892. In addition to <strong>the</strong> translation into<br />

German, <strong>the</strong> book was published in Hebrew in 1909 <strong>and</strong> in English in 1921; see<br />

Fenton, ibid., p. 222.<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!