- Page 1 and 2: WASHINGTON YMCA YOUTH & GOVERNMENT
- Page 3: Conducting the Trial 116 Suggestion
- Page 6 and 7: DIVIDER
- Page 8 and 9: 2012-2013 MOCK TRIAL PROGRAM CALEND
- Page 13 and 14: DIVIDER
- Page 15 and 16: MOCK TRIAL TESTIMONIALS “It is Mo
- Page 17 and 18: VISION STATEMENT New generations of
- Page 19 and 20: COACHING RESPONSIBILITIES Coaching
- Page 21 and 22: 12 YMCA Youth & Government Board of
- Page 23 and 24: 14 2001 Crim State v. Tag Montague
- Page 25 and 26: What happens during the trial When
- Page 27 and 28: Kit contains a list of District Con
- Page 29 and 30: What’s involved in preparing for
- Page 31: know the facts of the case very wel
- Page 34 and 35: DIVIDER
- Page 36 and 37: Expenses: Staffing Training Volunte
- Page 38 and 39: Listed below are local fundraising
- Page 40 and 41: DIVIDER
- Page 42 and 43: February District events Submit s
- Page 44 and 45: INTRODUCTION - TRIALS AND AMERICAN
- Page 46 and 47: PLANNING FOR A MOCK TRIAL CONDUCTIN
- Page 48 and 49: a. Number of Attorney and Witness R
- Page 50 and 51: d) Case Materials are separate pack
- Page 52 and 53: CLASSROOM ARRANGEMENT For the actua
- Page 54 and 55: LESSON PLAN 1 INTRODUCTION TO DISPU
- Page 56 and 57: LESSON PLAN 2 STEPS IN A TRIAL OBJE
- Page 58 and 59: LESSON PLAN 4 STRATEGY AND CASE ANA
- Page 60 and 61:
LESSON PLAN 5 PREPARATION OF PROSEC
- Page 62 and 63:
EXAMINING ATTORNEY GROUPS (P2 and D
- Page 64 and 65:
LESSON PLAN 6 THE RULES OF EVIDENCE
- Page 66 and 67:
j) No, not as an expert, but he can
- Page 68 and 69:
LESSON PLAN 7 THE MOCK TRIAL (One t
- Page 70 and 71:
REVIEW #1 (from Lessons 1 and 2) TR
- Page 72 and 73:
REVIEW #2(A) RULES OF EVIDENCE - HY
- Page 74 and 75:
7. The case: A department store sue
- Page 76 and 77:
Three common ways of settling dispu
- Page 78 and 79:
convince the judge or jury that the
- Page 80 and 81:
STEPS IN A TRIAL Note to Students:
- Page 82 and 83:
attorney should highlight the facts
- Page 84 and 85:
Allow your witness to explain some
- Page 86 and 87:
Listen carefully for the kind of at
- Page 88 and 89:
DESCRIPTION: The purpose of the clo
- Page 91 and 92:
DIVIDER
- Page 93 and 94:
CIVICS EDUCATION RESOURCES A listin
- Page 95 and 96:
stories of women, African Americans
- Page 97 and 98:
Learning Adventures in Citizenship
- Page 99 and 100:
into a network of more than 110 aff
- Page 101 and 102:
MOCK TRIAL RESOURCE LIST Washington
- Page 103 and 104:
State Bar of California Kids and th
- Page 105 and 106:
DIVIDER
- Page 107 and 108:
TIPS FOR PREPARING WITNESSES AND AT
- Page 109 and 110:
CASE PREPARATION TIPS FOR ATTORNEY
- Page 111 and 112:
9. The witnesses' performance will
- Page 113 and 114:
AWARDS AND RECOGNITION DISTRICT COM
- Page 115 and 116:
TRIAL SEQUENCE & INFORMATION FOR ST
- Page 117 and 118:
BAILIFF/CLERK RESPONSIBILITIES Note
- Page 119 and 120:
BAILIFF’S TIME CARD NUMBERS* Plea
- Page 121 and 122:
1/2 103
- Page 123 and 124:
2 105
- Page 125 and 126:
10 107
- Page 127 and 128:
TIME GUIDELINES FOR MOCK TRIALS The
- Page 129 and 130:
COURTROOM HOST RESPONSIBILITIES Eac
- Page 131 and 132:
GUIDELINES FOR ATTORNEY COACHES Stu
- Page 133 and 134:
8. If it is necessary to call a rec
- Page 135 and 136:
SUGGESTIONS FOR JUDGES AND AUDIENCE
- Page 137 and 138:
For many students, critiques are th
- Page 139 and 140:
Important! When awarding points, pl
- Page 141 and 142:
Rubric for Scoring Attorney Perform
- Page 143 and 144:
AN EXPLANATION OF SCORING By Judge
- Page 145 and 146:
ecord against Texas in Round 4. For
- Page 147 and 148:
DIVIDER
- Page 149 and 150:
MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION RULES The an
- Page 151 and 152:
props are allowed. Witness roles ca
- Page 153 and 154:
21.Unless otherwise directed by the
- Page 155 and 156:
educational goals of the Mock Trial
- Page 157 and 158:
Sources for additional commentary i
- Page 159 and 160:
(F) Proper Foundation Required. Att
- Page 161 and 162:
not reported his exemplary record f
- Page 163 and 164:
There is a formal procedure for int
- Page 165 and 166:
Although relevant, evidence may be
- Page 167 and 168:
However, this evidence may be admis
- Page 169 and 170:
compromising or attempting to compr
- Page 171 and 172:
Comment: Privileges exempt a witnes
- Page 173 and 174:
credibility of nonparty witnesses a
- Page 175 and 176:
elevant facts or matters contained
- Page 177 and 178:
is laid. For example, a witness is
- Page 179 and 180:
Comment: Because Rule 703 allows th
- Page 181 and 182:
(1) Prior statement by witness -- T
- Page 183 and 184:
judge may admit a statement provisi
- Page 185 and 186:
Comment and example, 803(3), (state
- Page 187 and 188:
Rule 804. HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS; DECLA
- Page 189:
Comment, 804(b)(3). This rule sets
- Page 192 and 193:
DIVIDER
- Page 195 and 196:
INTRODUCTION “The Last Ferry": gr
- Page 197 and 198:
STIPULATIONS: 1. The three anonymou
- Page 199:
INDICTMENT 5
- Page 202 and 203:
2. The defendants planned an act of
- Page 204 and 205:
omb a place of public use and a pub
- Page 207 and 208:
Instruction No. 1 The defendant has
- Page 209 and 210:
A conspiracy requires the participa
- Page 211:
WITNESS STATEMENTS 15
- Page 214 and 215:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 216 and 217:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 218 and 219:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 220 and 221:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 222 and 223:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 224 and 225:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 226 and 227:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 228 and 229:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 230 and 231:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 232 and 233:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 234 and 235:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 236 and 237:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 238 and 239:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 240 and 241:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 242 and 243:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 244 and 245:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 246 and 247:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 248 and 249:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 250 and 251:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 252 and 253:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 254 and 255:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
- Page 257:
EXHIBITS 59
- Page 260 and 261:
Exhibit 2 61
- Page 262 and 263:
Exhibit 4 63
- Page 264 and 265:
Exhibit 6 65
- Page 267 and 268:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRI
- Page 269 and 270:
Appellants argue that the district
- Page 271 and 272:
1. Challenge to Scope of Expert Tes
- Page 273 and 274:
United States v. Mejia, 545 F.3d 17
- Page 275 and 276:
ased upon sufficient facts or data,
- Page 277 and 278:
This Court has not been blind to th
- Page 279 and 280:
an officer expert as having “exte
- Page 281 and 282:
State of Washington v. Ronquillo, 1
- Page 283 and 284:
United States v. Hankey, 203 F.3d 1
- Page 285 and 286:
In Daubert, the Supreme Court, addr
- Page 287 and 288:
some wear colors, give signs, bear
- Page 289 and 290:
presently in a specific unit of the
- Page 291 and 292:
After getting her assurance that