29.01.2015 Views

Richard Craddock's Career with the East India Company - Man Family

Richard Craddock's Career with the East India Company - Man Family

Richard Craddock's Career with the East India Company - Man Family

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18<br />

1656<br />

In March 1656 <strong>the</strong> <strong>East</strong> <strong>India</strong> <strong>Company</strong> in London experienced<br />

one of its occasional economic downturns ‘… <strong>the</strong> large<br />

quantities of <strong>East</strong> <strong>India</strong> commodities which are arrived in<br />

to England have much declined in value’ (EFI 55-60 p. 61).<br />

This crisis prompted a letter to be sent out to Surat on<br />

<strong>the</strong> 27th of that month ordering <strong>the</strong> closure of all <strong>the</strong><br />

company’s factories except <strong>the</strong> one at Surat and <strong>the</strong><br />

dismissal of all <strong>the</strong> company’s factors except a handful who<br />

were to remain at Surat v . Among those who were slated for<br />

dismissal was <strong>Richard</strong> Craddock although this was dependent<br />

on any of those who had been retained not being available<br />

in which case Craddock was to replace that person. However<br />

if all those who were asked to stay could stay <strong>the</strong>n<br />

Craddock was not to be kept on in expectation of a vacancy.<br />

Indeed, all those who were dismissed, including Craddock,<br />

were to return to London at <strong>the</strong>ir own expense or were to be<br />

‘absolutely discharged and dismissed’. (EFI 55-60, p. 60)<br />

Long before <strong>the</strong> above letter was received (when), Craddock<br />

had already decided to quit Ahmadabad which he did on<br />

February 25 1656. He did so because <strong>the</strong> Ahmadabad factory<br />

was experiencing one of <strong>the</strong> cyclical downtowns in <strong>the</strong> price<br />

of indigo and it was no longer economically viable to<br />

continue <strong>the</strong>re. Unfortunately he did not get far. Barring<br />

his way was a mob of indignant indigo makers who insisted<br />

that before Craddock left Ahmadabad he was to personally<br />

weigh <strong>the</strong> Indigo that he intended to send after him. What<br />

sparked <strong>the</strong> indigo makers suspicion we can ga<strong>the</strong>r from<br />

Craddock’s letter:<br />

Not<strong>with</strong>standing I told <strong>the</strong>m that <strong>the</strong> brokers, after my<br />

departure, would have order to weigh it, yet <strong>the</strong>y were not<br />

content <strong>the</strong>re<strong>with</strong>, saying that, while <strong>the</strong>re was an<br />

Englishman here, <strong>the</strong>re was some hope, but if I went, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

<strong>the</strong>n knew not what to trust to. (Letter from Craddock, EFI<br />

55-60, p. 74)<br />

As a result Craddock was forced to write to Surat for<br />

permission to remain at Ahmadabad until <strong>the</strong> indigo was<br />

weighed and packed. As a matter of fact he did not quit <strong>the</strong><br />

city until <strong>the</strong> middle of June 1656, when he was relieved by<br />

Anthony Smith, whose principal business on behalf of <strong>the</strong><br />

company was to recover debts. [see <strong>the</strong> letter from<br />

Ahmadabad to Surat 18 June 1656 – (J 124) in Factory<br />

Records, Surat Vol. 103]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!