comments in PDF - Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club
comments in PDF - Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club
comments in PDF - Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
On Page 75, Management of Research Natural Areas, the NPS should show where<br />
these areas are, tell how many acres they cover, and state what the purpose is of each<br />
one. The public and decision-makers need this <strong>in</strong>formation so they can review,<br />
comment on, and understand Alternative A.<br />
On Pages 75-76, Historic Structures and Landscapes, NPS uses words like<br />
preserved and stabilized but does not provide a def<strong>in</strong>ition and explanation about what<br />
these words mean. This is particularly important <strong>in</strong> Wilderness (Hunter L<strong>in</strong>e Cab<strong>in</strong>)<br />
where Wilderness character must be protected when conduct<strong>in</strong>g any historic work. The<br />
public and decision-makers need this <strong>in</strong>formation so they can review, comment on, and<br />
understand Alternative A.<br />
On Page 77, Hik<strong>in</strong>g Trails, Trailheads, and Horse Use, NPS states that “Horseback<br />
rid<strong>in</strong>g would cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be allowed on some of the park’s <strong>in</strong>terior trails”. The word<br />
“some” is mislead<strong>in</strong>g. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>Sierra</strong> <strong>Club</strong>’s calculation, us<strong>in</strong>g the Trails<br />
Unlimited Map mileage of GMNP, about 47.7 miles of the 82 total miles of hik<strong>in</strong>g trails<br />
allow horses on them, which is over 50% of the trails (58.2%). Page 191 of the draft<br />
GMP/EIS states “About 60 percent of the trails are open to horses”. This is more than<br />
“some” trails allowed for horse use.<br />
On Page 77, Park Operations, the NPS states “There would not be any commercial<br />
services plann<strong>in</strong>g”. The <strong>Sierra</strong> <strong>Club</strong> supports no commercial services plann<strong>in</strong>g because<br />
GMNP can be both hiked and ridden by horses without commercial services. This is<br />
done currently and has been done very successfully for many years. There is no need<br />
for commercial services plann<strong>in</strong>g. The primitive, Wilderness, quality of GMNP, which is<br />
a small national park, should be kept, protected, husbanded because it is rare to f<strong>in</strong>d<br />
these days. People need to enter Wilderness or Wilderness-like areas (backcountry)<br />
with humility and on Wilderness’s terms and not ours, which often means reliance on<br />
mechanized means and modern gadgets <strong>in</strong>stead of our primitive skills and <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>cts.<br />
Wilderness is for solitude, quiet, contemplation, enjoyment of natural sounds, and peace<br />
for the soul. There are so few places like this anymore. The <strong>Sierra</strong> <strong>Club</strong> does not want<br />
to see GMNP loved to death. As NPS states on page 90, “Visitors to Guadalupe<br />
Mounta<strong>in</strong>s would be given opportunities to have a true wilderness experience at a selfsufficiency<br />
level … Through direct experience, visitors would be able to ga<strong>in</strong> a first-hand<br />
understand<strong>in</strong>g of wilderness values”.<br />
On Page 78, Boundary Adjustment, the <strong>Sierra</strong> <strong>Club</strong> supports <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the two parcels<br />
of NPS owned land <strong>in</strong> the boundaries of GMNP. We also support acquir<strong>in</strong>g more land<br />
to provide protection the view-shed, to protect geological, biological, and ecological<br />
resources, and to buffer GMNP from <strong>in</strong>compatible uses and provide migration corridors<br />
for plants and animals due to climate change. NPS should discuss opportunities for<br />
land acquisition <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the 10,000 acres of land that is adjacent to McKittrick Canyon<br />
that has recently gone on the market for $1,000/acre.<br />
14