comments in PDF - Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club
comments in PDF - Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club
comments in PDF - Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Mounta<strong>in</strong> Trail, Marcus Trail, Foothills Trail, Guadalupe Peak Trail, Salt Bas<strong>in</strong> Overlook<br />
Trail, El Capitan Trail, and McKittrick Canyon Trail. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>Sierra</strong> <strong>Club</strong>’s<br />
calculation, us<strong>in</strong>g the Trails Unlimited Map mileage of GMNP, about 47.7 miles of the 82<br />
total miles of hik<strong>in</strong>g trails allow horses on them, which is over 50% of the trails (58.2%).<br />
This is more than “some” trails allowed for horse use. Page 191 states that 60% of the<br />
trails are used for horseback rid<strong>in</strong>g. The public and decision-makers need this<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation so they can review, comment on, and understand this proposal.<br />
98) Page 240 Activities and Dest<strong>in</strong>ations, what does “A small <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> use” mean<br />
The public and decision-makers need this <strong>in</strong>formation so they can review, comment on,<br />
and understand this proposal.<br />
99) Page 241, Scenic Views, how long is the electric l<strong>in</strong>e that will be removed from<br />
McKittrick Creek The public and decision-makers need this <strong>in</strong>formation so they can<br />
review, comment on, and understand this proposal.<br />
100) Page 241, Scenic Views, Cumulative Impacts, what does “the cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />
protection of scenic views is substantial” mean This seems like a strange statement<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce NPS has previously <strong>in</strong> this draft GMP/EIS stated that air quality, which obscures<br />
scenic views, is not an issue topic and NPS cannot do much about. The public and<br />
decision-makers need this <strong>in</strong>formation so they can review, comment on, and understand<br />
this proposal.<br />
101) Page 241, Scenic Views, Conclusion, what does “would have generally adverse<br />
impacts” mean The public and decision-makers need this <strong>in</strong>formation so they can<br />
review, comment on, and understand this proposal.<br />
102) Page 243, Hous<strong>in</strong>g and Community Infrastructure, what does “m<strong>in</strong>imally<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased demand” mean The public and decision-makers need this <strong>in</strong>formation so<br />
they can review, comment on, and understand this proposal.<br />
103) Page 243, Hous<strong>in</strong>g and Community Infrastructure, Cumulative Effects, what<br />
does “effects would be very small” mean The public and decision-makers need this<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation so they can review, comment on, and understand this proposal.<br />
104) Page 243, Hous<strong>in</strong>g and Community Infrastructure, Conclusion, what does<br />
“contribution to these effects would be very small” mean The public and decisionmakers<br />
need this <strong>in</strong>formation so they can review, comment on, and understand this<br />
proposal.<br />
105) Page 243, Hous<strong>in</strong>g and Community Infrastructure, Cumulative Effects, NPS<br />
states “Increases <strong>in</strong> residential development, … could result <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased visitation<br />
levels at the park and require additional management efforts along those park<br />
boundaries … could require a reallocation of staff, decreas<strong>in</strong>g their availability <strong>in</strong> other<br />
areas of the park” and then says on page 243, Management and Adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />
“Through core operations, the park management is streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the organization …<br />
40