comments in PDF - Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club
comments in PDF - Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club
comments in PDF - Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
would hire more seasonal and term position rather than us<strong>in</strong>g full-time staff for these<br />
activities” and on page 244, Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, states “the potential of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g visitation,<br />
the park staff could be presented with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g challenges <strong>in</strong> carry<strong>in</strong>g out the park’s<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>tenance requirements”.<br />
These quotes are contradictory. While park visitation may <strong>in</strong>crease and cause the need<br />
for more people, NPS is cutt<strong>in</strong>g its staff from 40 to 34. There is no way that seasonal<br />
employees can do the same quality work and the same amount of work as full-time<br />
employees. This is penny wise and pound foolish th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g. NPS pays seasonal<br />
employees very poor salaries. Seasonal employees are only around for a few months<br />
and cannot learn the needs and resources of GMNP <strong>in</strong> the same manner as full-time<br />
employees.<br />
But what happens if the opposite occurs Due to high gasol<strong>in</strong>e prices fewer people<br />
come to GMNP. The figures shown on page 190, Table 8, Recreational Visitation <strong>in</strong><br />
2000-2008, document a decl<strong>in</strong>e from a high of 222,307 <strong>in</strong> 2001 to 174,157 <strong>in</strong> 2006.<br />
This is before gasol<strong>in</strong>e prices rose astronomically to almost $4/gallon right now. The<br />
forecast is for further rises <strong>in</strong> gasol<strong>in</strong>e prices and for these <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> price to rema<strong>in</strong><br />
high. Why does NPS not talk about this and how it will affect GMNP The public and<br />
decision-makers need this <strong>in</strong>formation so they can review, comment on, and understand<br />
this proposal.<br />
106) Page 244, Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, Cumulative Impacts, what <strong>in</strong>formal trails are NPS<br />
talk<strong>in</strong>g about How many of these trails are likely to be made and where What are<br />
their environmental impacts The public and decision-makers need this <strong>in</strong>formation so<br />
they can review, comment on, and understand this proposal.<br />
107) Page 244, Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, Cumulative Impacts, what does “effects would be<br />
slight” mean The public and decision-makers need this <strong>in</strong>formation so they can<br />
review, comment on, and understand this proposal.<br />
108) Page 244, Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, Conclusion, what does “contribution would be slight”<br />
mean The public and decision-makers need this <strong>in</strong>formation so they can review,<br />
comment on, and understand this proposal.<br />
109) Pages 244-245, The Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of the<br />
Environment and the Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity,<br />
what does “susta<strong>in</strong>able action” mean Why is Alternative A, a “susta<strong>in</strong>able action”<br />
NPS does not expla<strong>in</strong>. What criteria is NPS us<strong>in</strong>g to judge an alternative’s<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ability What are the local short-term uses that this draft GMP/EIS proposes<br />
What is the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and enhancement of long-term productivity that NPS<br />
compares to short-term uses and that this draft GMP/EIS provides The public and<br />
decision-makers need this <strong>in</strong>formation so they can review, comment on, and understand<br />
this proposal.<br />
41